Now Sharmila targeted for endorsing tolerance.

Page

Next Last

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 9 years ago

This author is trying to rile people up by painting Sharmila as a hypocrite and some kinda Hindu hater and being partial to Muslims coz Sharmila recently called out for tolerance. 😡

And so evident is it that in her article she ONLY focuses on Saba identifying as Muslim and Saif converting Amrita.

She completely omits the fact that Kareena DID NOT convert. That Kareena-Saif celebrate all Hindu festivals alongside Christian and Muslim ones as well.

And she totally leaves out the fact that Soha married a Hindu man.

Hate people who try to create division between people! 😡😡😡

This author can SHOVE IT! 😡

Here's the large essay

http://www.dailyo.in/politics/sharmila-tagore-dadri-murder-writers-protest-mm-kalburgi-govind-pansare-shiv-sena-kashmiri-pandits-constitution-hindutva-islam/story/1/7002.html

Edited by desigal90 - 9 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

870349

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

Sharmila is very pretty . She's looks great for whatever her age is oh yeah I'm sure she isn't what this person is claiming she is . How can someone with that face be a hater

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

chrisevans

@chrisevans

Explorer

Posted: 9 years ago

Saswati rightfully pointed out the hypocrisy of Sharmila
truth is bitter

Quote

1061832

Suspended

Posted: 9 years ago

I dont like sharmila. I find her to be a doormat.

Quote

riddhima

@RiddhimaK

Stunner

Posted: 9 years ago

I really not interested in politics but I will say thanks to new govt for exposing fake securalists..lol

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 9 years ago

How so?

Sharmila's son in law is HINDU.

Sharmila's daughter in law is HINDU.

How is that NOT secular?

His son doesnt practice Islam any more than he celebrates Hindu rituals.

He moved into his new house only after performing Puja

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/Saifeena-perform-griha-pravesh-puja-at-new-home/articleshow/16264566.cms

At Diwali

Edited by desigal90 - 9 years ago

Quote

chrisevans

@chrisevans

Explorer

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: SaxxyBanno
I really not interested in politics but I will say thanks to new govt for exposing fake securalists..lol

+1

Isko kehte hain Karz chukana😆
She was appointed as censor board chief
2004-2011
Saif got national award for HumTum movie 😲 🤣

Got Padmashri 😲
supports one political party

Silent on pujari and angry on Dadri
selective outrage
Hypocrisy

Edited by chrisevans - 9 years ago

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: chrisevans

Isko kehte hain Karz chukana😆
She was appointed as censor board chief
2004-2011
Saif got national award for HumTum movie 😲 🤣

Got Padmashri 😲

What does that have anything to do with secularism, Hinduism, or the article?

This is the oldest and weakest strategy someone uses in a debate. Throws a red herring. Tries to paint someone by mud slinging in a way that has NOTHING to do with the topic.

Just shows that you don't have much facts to support your argument mate.

Quote

chrisevans

@chrisevans

Explorer

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: desigal90

What does that have anything to do with secularism, Hinduism, or the article?
This is the oldest and weakest strategy someone uses in a debate. Throws a red herring. Tries to paint someone by mud slinging in a way that has NOTHING to do with the topic.
Just shows that you don't have much facts to support your argument mate.

no my friend,my point was hypocrisy
Saswati points out hypocrisy
Hypocrisy ka ek swarth hota hai
U may be biased
Maine reason dikhaya ki kya swarth hai
samjhnewale samajh jayenge

Edited by chrisevans - 9 years ago

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 9 years ago

#10

Her article has as many biases.

Why did she leave out Soha marrying a Hindu guy?

Why did she leave out that Saif is married to a Hindu woman?

But she harps on about the fact that Saba identifies as Muslim.

Shouldn't this critic's article, which is about hypocrisy, be FREE from hypocrisy? She's selectively choosing ONLY the information that can rile up a crowd without providing the full balanced picture. Because she wants to project that Sharmila is NOT secular, she left out all pertinent facts that ARE secular about her.

How convenient

Edited by desigal90 - 9 years ago

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 6

Now Sharmila targeted for endorsing tolerance.

Related Topics

Explore Topics