Kapoors with Abhishek Bachchan before ISL game - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

23

Views

6k

Users

6

Likes

34

Frequent Posters

LuvBolly thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: ColdestWinter





Who knows? but he looks very 'happy' with her though






He seemed pretty happy with Karisma too. Maybe this girl is it for him. But unfortunately he doesn't have a very good reputation when it comes to the issues of fidelity.



Edited by LuvBolly - 10 years ago
263437 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: LuvBolly


You know what I always found suspect? Karisma was officially engaged to Abhishek on October of 2002. They broke up on February of 2003. By September of 2003 she married Sanjay. 7 months after the break up of her engagement to the man she was with for several years she was already in love and ready to be married. I wonder if the rumors that the marriage was an arrangement between Babita and Sanjay's Mom to do some damage control (Sanjay wasn't looking good after his first divorce) are true?


I don't know if Karisma would have had a happy married life with Abhishek. She seems to be too much under Babita's thumb. It might not have ended in such a scandalous way as her marriage to Sanjay did but I think it still might have.


Wouldn't be surprised. I guess Karisma and Babita wanted to show the Bachchans that they could find a more eligible man. Who would have thought things would go horribly wrong and he would humiliate her by openly dating another woman?
1009226 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#13
LuvBolly and CarrotCake, I have got something special for you guys😆 OK so here's the scoop


https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/bollywood/726152/didnt-they-make-a-cute-couple?pn=5



4) Kareena was instrumental in bringing Karishma and Abhi together. They got engaged in Oct 2002. Karishma attended a wedding in December 2002, where her pictures of heavy duty dancing with Sanjay Kapoor were splashed all over the newpapers. This was two months after she had been engaged to Abhi, and even at that time, it had caused a great deal of embarrassment to the Bachchan family. Reports said Karishma always had this huge crush over Sanjay Kapoor, but he was not only way older to her, but also loved another lady Nandita whom he later married, then divorced.

5) Karishma and Abhishek's engagement broke in Feb 2003, and Karishma married Sanjay seven months later. Her meeting Sanjay in December and dancing with him in abandon while still being engaged to Abhi and then marrying him within the next seven months leaving a broken engagement in her wake speaks volumes..


263437 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: ColdestWinter

LuvBolly and CarrotCake, I have got something special for you guys😆 OK so here's the scoop


https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/bollywood/726152/didnt-they-make-a-cute-couple?pn=5



4) Kareena was instrumental in bringing Karishma and Abhi together. They got engaged in Oct 2002. Karishma attended a wedding in December 2002, where her pictures of heavy duty dancing with Sanjay Kapoor were splashed all over the newpapers. This was two months after she had been engaged to Abhi, and even at that time, it had caused a great deal of embarrassment to the Bachchan family. Reports said Karishma always had this huge crush over Sanjay Kapoor, but he was not only way older to her, but also loved another lady Nandita whom he later married, then divorced.

5) Karishma and Abhishek's engagement broke in Feb 2003, and Karishma married Sanjay seven months later. Her meeting Sanjay in December and dancing with him in abandon while still being engaged to Abhi and then marrying him within the next seven months leaving a broken engagement in her wake speaks volumes..



Oh, thanks for sharing this. 😃
Could it be that she had an affair and then ended her engagement? Or did Abhi and his family see the photos and then decided to break the engagement?
Bollywood is a crazy world. 😆
kareena05 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: LuvBolly



I don't know Kareena05, Abhishek always looked so serious with Karisma. But I don't think it was Karsima per say but rather he himself. Maybe he was shy or self conscious. But I don't remember seeing these big cheesy and from the heart smiles that he has now.


Based on all the rumors of Babita's hand in the break up of that engagement sometimes I wonder how she feels now? Abhishek may not be a top Bollywood star but financially he's very secure, and he adores Aishwarya and she just seems so over the moon happy being his wife and the Bachchan bahu.



Agree he looks happy with Aishwarya too, she is the perfect Bahu and respects the family and all.
But Abhishek and Karisma were dating for years and it's sad the mother (Babita) intefered just after they got engaged.






Scorpio_Velvet thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#16
Jaya didn't look like a grumpy old woman those days. 😆

Yea, too bad Karishma let Babita control her life. Kareena is total opposite.
Edited by Scorpio_Velvet - 10 years ago
1009226 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: LuvBolly




I don't know if Karisma would have had a happy married life with Abhishek. She seems to be too much under Babita's thumb.





Exactly! even Sanjay had issues with Babita's meddling ways and he even lambasted her in print


'I cannot run her mother's house'

TNN | Aug 25, 2005, 10.50PM IST
inShare

Page 1 of 2

NEW DELHI: Days after Karisma Kapoor accused husband Sunjay Kapur of using their five-month-old daughter Samaira as a pawn, it was the turn of the Delhi-based industrialist to allege that his wife was using the media to air her affadavit even before he received it.

Sunjay stated that it had become impossible to fulfil his wife's expectations that he run her mother's house. In his rejoinder to Karisma's affidavit before Delhi High Court, he expressed shock that the actress was making financial contributions an issue in a litigation which is related to the "illegal" procurement of a passport for their daughter. The case will come up for hearing on Friday.

Sunjay, too, accused Karisma of leaving him. "I state the fact that the respondent (Karisma) in a pre-planned manner went for the delivery of our first child to her mother's place and refused to return. She is using Samaira to cause emotional trauma to me and deprive me, as well as our daughter, of love and care," Sunjay claimed.

Kapur also said it was wrong to state that he never visited Mumbai.

According to him, he visited the metropolis just to meet his wife and daughter. Through their marriage, he claimed to have taken care of Karisma's expenses, including credit card payments, telephone bills, travel expenses within India and abroad, restaurant and night club bills.

Sunjay also claims to have paid film producers whom Karisma owed money.

"In fact, I continue to pay her credit card and phone bills,"he stated. Copies of credit card statements have been annexed along with the rejoinder.


He said if Karisma continues to have a grievance with regard to lack of financial contribution on his part, he was willing to reimburse the expenses she incured on their daughter.

"However, if she expects me to run her mother's house while I am running the expenses of our matrimonial house, the same is totally unjustifiable," Sunjay said.

Karisma, according to his submission, has acted against their daughter's best interest. Since Sunjay is a US passport holder, he said the actress, by procurring an Indian passport for the daughter, had curtailed Samaira's right to choose citizenship.

He further challenged Karisma's right as a guardian. Under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, it's the father who has the power to act on behalf of a minor child.

"There is a distinction between a guardianship and custody... I deny there is any desertion on my part. Even though my wife holds some ill-founded grudges against me, she should not punish our daughter in this manner,"Sunjay said.

He claimed that Karisma had misread the provisions of the Indian Passport Act. According to him, if a couple is neither divorced nor judicially separated, the consent of both parents is mandatory before a passport can be issued.

1009226 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#18

Karisma's mother behind her split?

HomeBollywoodWhat'S Hot?
Thursday, August 25, 2005 17:23 IST
By Santa Banta News Network
Bollywood actress Karisma Kapoor's husband Sanjay Kapur today moved an application before the Delhi High Court seeking to implead their five-month-old daughter Samaira as a co-petitioner and appoint him as next friend of the minor for court proceedings.

In his application filed through counsel Manisha Singhal, Sanjay said he was the natural guardian of Samaira and as such he was responsible for and entitled to take all decisions relating to the minor in her interest.

Sanjay, who has filed a writ petition seeking to restrain Karisma from going abroad along with Samaira and cancellation of the minor's passport issued by Regional Passport Office (RPO), Mumbai, submitted that it would be in the interest of justice to add Samaira as a co-petitioner/co-applicant in these proceedings and appoint him as her next friend.

Sanjay's application was likely to be taken up on August 26 when his writ petition would come up for hearing.

Interestingly, it was Karisma whose counsel had on the last date wondered how the petitioner was seeking cancellation of Samaira's passport without impleading her as a party to the case.

Contending that "custody of the child does not ipso facto amount to guardianship", Sanjay said while Karisma may be in the actual physical custody of the child by unilaterally keeping the minor away from her rightful home, "she (Karisma) is not the sole guardian of our daughter."

Claiming to be the natural guardian of Samaira, Sanjay said only he could defend the best interest of the child.

Sunjay, too, accused Karisma of leaving him. "I state the fact that the respondent (Karisma) in a pre-planned manner went for the delivery of our first child to her mother's place and refused to return. She is using Samaira to cause emotional trauma to me and deprive me, as well as our daughter, of love and care," Sunjay claimed.

According to him, he visited the metropolis just to meet his wife and daughter. Through their marriage, he claimed to have taken care of Karisma's expenses, including credit card payments, telephone bills, travel expenses within India and abroad, restaurant and night club bills.

Sunjay also claims to have paid film producers whom Karisma owed money.

"In fact, I continue to pay her credit card and phone bills,"he stated. Copies of credit card statements have been annexed along with the rejoinder.

He said if Karisma continues to have a grievance with regard to lack of financial contribution on his part, he was willing to reimburse the expenses she incured on their daughter.

"However, if she expects me to run her mother's house while I am running the expenses of our matrimonial house, the same is totally unjustifiable," Sunjay said.

Sanjay also submitted a certificate from a Delhi-based paediatrician who advised against the five-month-old baby's travel to US as it would expose the baby to unnecessary hazards of infection as result of the travel in a confined aircraft cabin for at least 24 hours each way.

It could also result into possible barotrauma to the ears from air travel, jet lag and interruption of routine, the certificate issued by the doctor said.

In her affidavit in response to Sanjay's petition, Karisma had on August 20 said that she was deserted by her disgruntled' husband Sanjay Kapur who dragged her to court in a crude attempt' to seek redress of their matrimonial issues by using their five-month-old daughter Samaira as a pawn'.

The actress said Sanjay constructively deserted her and that he was aware why she was "compelled to reside in Mumbai".

Seeking dismissal of Sanjay's petition on the ground of lack of jurisdiction as the passport was issued by RPO, Mumbai, Karisma submitted that the contours of the petition left no doubt that it was nothing but a crude attempt' to urge and seek redress of matrimonial issues of a disgruntled husband and Karisma by using the minor as a pawn.

Karisma alleged, "barring a few occasional visits to meet their daughter, the petitioner has played no part in the upbringing and welfare of the minor child even today.

"Particularly, the petitioner (Sanjay) has made no financial contribution to the upkeep of the child and the pre-natal, delivery and post-natal care of the mother," she submitted in her affidavit filed through Karanjawala and Co.

Sanjay was supposed to file his rejoinder to Karisma's affidavit today.
263437 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#19
^^ I know that there are two sides to every story, but both Babita and Karisma sound greedy and money-minded after reading those articles.
Edited by CarrotCake - 10 years ago
1009226 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#20
^Scans from a 1995 magazine 😆

https://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m32p0tT4Fu1qctnzso4_r1_1280.png

https://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m32p0tT4Fu1qctnzso5_r1_1280.png

Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: priya185

21 days ago

Abhishek Bachchan steals fans phones 😂

Abhishek Bachchan steals fans phones 😂 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNm3eqQR2oS/?igsh=YXk5dXM4OGx4cWQ5

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: BhataktiJawani

1 months ago

Kangu Blasts Jaya Bachchan

What you all think? https://www.instagram.com/p/DNQlsheyLRc/?igsh=cDkzZWhxeWwxYzdx

https://www.instagram.com/p/DNQlsheyLRc/?igsh=cDkzZWhxeWwxYzdx
Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: beena_jon

1 months ago

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".