Controversial Box office collections of krrish 3 - Page 12

Originally posted by: Bossman

Here's the deal

1) BOI is faceless. It has no friends in the industry, no production houses to suck up to, no favors needed from stars to come to their shows. Faceless and unbiased.
2) They have a system in place unlike all these other trade analysts. They take into account everything, the cost the distributors pay to acquire the film, the number of screens, the collections.
So when a YJHD does 186 cr it is a huge surprise to the trade because the film is sold relatively cheap, is released on lesser screens than a money spinner like CE which is sold at massive prices and is expected to do massive business. Its not bias towards YJHD, its just a pleasant surprise.
3) They get there data directly from theatre owners. TA, Koimoi and every other analyst uses the producers figures which I have absolutely no confidence in.

For these three reasons BOI > Any other data collection site.

a) I have no idea why Dabangg was robbed of its ATBB tag, I feel that's wrong. BOI should address that.
b) Rangeela was never a big hit. Like all RGV films including Satya, Shiva, Bhoot etc it only did business in Mumbai and the South and was plain average everywhere else.

Originally posted by: slumgod..

This thread proved that only MrsMalhotra is true SRK fan. Sorry BI and Karan. You two have no concern whatsoever that Krish3 is going to cross Chennai Express.

Originally posted by: DJBhaiJaan

Umm. BOI is not faceless. People in the industry know who runs that site and many neutrals believe they are not worthy of a halo over their head. Also they don't get all their data from theatre owners. Majority of the data comes from distributors and some from Exhibitors even after which many screens are still left unreported and they just assume what the figure would have been their looking at the occupancy in the nearby centres.

Originally posted by: Bossman

Here's the deal

1) BOI is faceless. It has no friends in the industry, no production houses to suck up to, no favors needed from stars to come to their shows. Faceless and unbiased.
2) They have a system in place unlike all these other trade analysts. They take into account everything, the cost the distributors pay to acquire the film, the number of screens, the collections.
So when a YJHD does 186 cr it is a huge surprise to the trade because the film is sold relatively cheap, is released on lesser screens than a money spinner like CE which is sold at massive prices and is expected to do massive business. Its not bias towards YJHD, its just a pleasant surprise.
3) They get there data directly from theatre owners. TA, Koimoi and every other analyst uses the producers figures which I have absolutely no confidence in.

For these three reasons BOI > Any other data collection site.

a) I have no idea why Dabangg was robbed of its ATBB tag, I feel that's wrong. BOI should address that.
b) Rangeela was never a big hit. Like all RGV films including Satya, Shiva, Bhoot etc it only did business in Mumbai and the South and was plain average everywhere else.

Originally posted by: DJBhaiJaan

Umm. BOI is not faceless. People in the industry know who runs that site and many neutrals believe they are not worthy of a halo over their head. Also they don't get all their data from theatre owners. Majority of the data comes from distributors and some from Exhibitors even after which many screens are still left unreported and they just assume what the figure would have been their looking at the occupancy in the nearby centres.

Originally posted by: Bossman

You're absolutely wrong. Nobody knows who runs BOI. Nobody.

Its impossible to get a collection that is 100% correct but they come the closest.