I am going to skip the introduction as I think most of you have read her topic about how and why Vidya managed to climb the ladder but not Tabu. Most of the answers (including mine) revolved around that audiences tastes have changed considerably in the past few years.
But then I sat back and thought - why has Kangana Ranaut not come anywhere close to the height Vidya reached? Both of them debuted more-or-less at the same time.
I find her pretty enough - at least prettier than Sonam or Deepika. She's got talent, and even though she got typecast in the psycho roles, there's no denying that she does them extremely well. She showed potential from her very first film - Gangster (her best performance probably), and followed it up well with Woh Lamhe, Life in a Metro and Fashion. She also had commercial success with Raaz, Once Upon a Time in Mumbai, and Kites was one of the most hyped-up movie of 2010. And yet the buzz around her is almost nonexistent.
She is doing alright with critics, but the repeated psycho roles combined with no great movies in recent times makes her loose focus amongst them. Sure she received a National Award sometimes back - but let's face it: the buzz was all around Priyanka then.
So what did Vidya do that she couldn't? Is it because she got typecast in the psycho roles and hardly ventured to do anything outside of that? Or is it because she lacks connection, family name, and hardly worked with A-grade stars and big banners?
4