The Name Is Kaif. Katrina Kaif - Page 9

salman wasn't a big star between 2000 - 2009, because his films didn't exactly set the box office alight during this period.

^^we never know cunningLinguist...the only female centric action films we've ever had were those south dubbed "lady police" films...which were,to be honest, awfully made...

Originally posted by: CunningLinguist

female action movies work and do big business in hollywood.. a female action movie in bollywood wouldn't.

Originally posted by: Da_BagarhBilla

A Film is a Team Effort...1 can't deny the role of Heroines in all ATBB's...

If Srk won't have Romanced Simran - kajol... it won't be completeing 750 weeks in theatre...

If Aamir won't be taking Revenge of Kalpana - Asin... It won't be overshadowing all films...2 became Smash HIT ATBB...

If Salman won't be Romancing Nisha - Madhuri ... it won't be the Most Successful Family Entertainer of the Decade...

I think we should give Equal Credit of Film's Success to it's heroine also...

LOL, so are you saying that if SRK, Aamir and Salman weren't in the movies, they wouldn't of been as successful, how come you didn't write "If Kajol didn't romance... If Asin didn't romance... if Madhuri didn't romance..."??

Originally posted by: Da_BagarhBilla

Show a CLEAVAGE SHOW like DREW BARRYMORE... i Guarantee u BIGGER HIT NUMBERs...

Showing cleavage didn't exactly sky rocketed Malika Sherawat's career into space did it?..

Originally posted by: Da_BagarhBilla

A Film is a Team Effort...1 can't deny the role of Heroines in all ATBB's...

If Srk won't have Romanced Simran - kajol... it won't be completeing 750 weeks in theatre...

If Aamir won't be taking Revenge of Kalpana - Asin... It won't be overshadowing all films...2 became Smash HIT ATBB...

If Salman won't be Romancing Nisha - Madhuri ... it won't be the Most Successful Family Entertainer of the Decade...

I think we should give Equal Credit of Film's Success to it's heroine also...

Originally posted by: CunningLinguist

LOL, so are you saying that if SRK, Aamir and Salman weren't in the movies, they wouldn't of been as successful, how come you didn't write "If Kajol didn't romance... If Asin didn't romance... if Madhuri didn't romance..."??

Originally posted by: Da_BagarhBilla

salman wasn't a big star between 2000 - 2009, because his films didn't exactly set the box office alight during this period.

^

Well i can make this statement false by bringing all his Success Stories during this period... but don't wanna turn it into another Salman vs topic...

__

When a MALE STAR give a HIT, then only he comes into category of Stars who can give BUMPER OPENING...

I gave AJAB's Example with Ranbir's previous Movies... WAKE UP SID was his SOLO Release... if he was a STAR... y can't that movie got BUMPER OPENING with SUPERHIT TAG Later...???

AJAB brought him into big light as movie was accepted by YOUTH AUDIENCE to much extent...

___

And CUNNING LINGUIST... just coz i am debating, u don't have to bring SALMAN in all the comparison... coz if i bring Salman's Box Office No., then u will sing ACTING BHAJAN's of opposite star... so y nt just 2 cut the crap and let's just talk about TOPIC...

so what you're saying is that if Upen Patel was the male lead opposite Katrina in APKGK, the film woulld be just as successful?

Won't BE = Not Saying as Agar HERO na hota...

@cunningLinguist : lovve ur posts...u seem to be right on fire.🤗...way to go!!!!!👏