Not necessarily. An ordinary story, if it can be crafted into a good film, can be regarded as a 'classic'. Titanic (1998) or Avatar (2009) are few examples. DDLJ got overwhelmingly positive reviews from audiences, critics and fans alike. So, when you repeatedly say that DDLJ isn't a classic - on what basis do you say that? Simply because it isn't
in your personal opinion? If that is the case, you should not try to project your view as an absolutely given fact. An opinion should be labeled as an opinion, and I haven't seen anyone else doing the same form of stereotyping.
Per my understanding, a film which runs in the theater for non-stop fifteen whole years (a record), which is one of the two Hindi movies to be listed in the '1001 movies you must see before you die' list, holds the record (along with Devdas) for winning 10 awards at Filmfare, wins the National award for being the best popular film even after being a commercial flick through and through, and is still regarded highly even after completing its fifteen years must be
something. đ¤
I don't think one can just put down a piece of art just because it isn't
their thing, as that's very subjective. Looking at it, DDLJ has/had everything a commercial film requires. Good songs, good screenplays, memorable dialogues, decent direction, amazing acting by everyone, especially the lead pair, and without a doubt, the best pair Bollywood had ever seen. Not to mention that most of the things that we see today in films had been taken from DDLJ.
Edited by PhoeniXof_Hades - 15 years ago