Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 07 Sep 2025 EDT
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread-8 Sept 2025| Teams DT note P.58
NASEEB vs BADNASEEB 7. 6
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 8, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
BHAGODI MAIRA 8.9
「 ✦ Font-tastic Voyage Graphic Contest ✦ 」
Anupamaa 08 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Kareena Kapoor in London/ Birmingham for Malabar Gold and Diamonds
BALH Naya Season EDT Week #13: Sept 8 - Sept 12
The ba****ds of bollywood trailer
It seems like Modi Fans and Rahul Fans are debating each other like Tanisha fans and Gauhar fans -- even when they know that both are equally bad yet they chose to defend them. 😆
Saaley sab hi ke sab ek hi thaali ke baingan hai.
Originally posted by: ..Underworld..
not equally bad...Modi has done something...Gujarat's growth rate is comparable to China
while Rahul Gandhi, even though his party was in power for almost 10 years has done absolutely NOTHING
Originally posted by: Premeer_Diwani
leave RG.. he still need to grow up...😆and modi's development.. i dont know how is it possible.. because in 95 % recent survey gujarat is below kerala in development and growth rate..and being a keralite..if keral is abv gujarat, i can imagine gujarat's growth rate...😛
Originally posted by: ..Underworld..
Casting a slur on someone without proof is wrong and the victim is well within his rights to file a defamation case...freedom of speech doesn't mean you can say ANYTHING..people should read the rights in detail...there are some restrictions
Defamation: The clause (2) of Article 19 prevents any person from making any statement that injures the reputation of another. With the same view, defamation has been criminalised in India by inserting it into Section 499 of the I.P.C.
Ajaz has merely expressed his opinion and it does not constitutes defamation u/s 499 of IPC.
Our honorable Supreme Court has time and again stated in numerous cases that expressing ones opinion by any means is a fundamental right granted to every citizen of this country and this includes even a criticism of a public figure. Statements made against persons in the public eye cannot be considered defamatory unless they were made with "actual malice" ie with an intention to deliberately harm the reputation of the concerned person...REFER to LIC V. Manubhai D. Shah (1993), Express Newspapers (Private) Ltd. v. Union of India..
If Only criticism constituted defamation don't you think there would have been zillions of cases already instituted against AAP and BJP for defaming the current Central government !
Originally posted by: Cinemajunkie
Ajaz has merely expressed his opinion and it does not constitutes defamation u/s 499 of IPC.
Our honorable Supreme Court has time and again stated in numerous cases that expressing ones opinion by any means is a fundamental right granted to every citizen of this country and this includes even a criticism of a public figure. Statements made against persons in the public eye cannot be considered defamatory unless they were made with "actual malice" ie with an intention to deliberately harm the reputation of the concerned person...REFER to LIC V. Manubhai D. Shah (1993), Express Newspapers (Private) Ltd. v. Union of India..
If Only criticism constituted defamation don't you think there would have been zillions of cases already instituted against AAP and BJP for defaming the current Central government !
Originally posted by: ..Underworld..
It's not criticism, it's an allegation
calling someone 'chor' without proof is certainly not criticism