Case Filed Against Ajaz Khan For Calling BJPs Prime Ministerial Can - Page 6

Originally posted by: Cinemajunkie

yet no case stands unless there's reasonable evidence that would suggest that he made that remark with a malafide intention and to hurt Mr Modi's reputation.

but that is for the court to decide, if he is innocent he will be acquitted

...my point was that modi supporters are within their rights to file a case

...and wanted the people claiming it's a violation of our fundamental rights to know that it's actually not

I think,. It's fault of Colors,..

Ghar mein tau hazaar tareeke ki baatein hoti raheti hai,.. Colors should be rather careful,.. for censoring and making absolutely sure that what goes on the air,.. and in no way,.. it should imply as,...

Some celeb was demeant purposely on the national Tv and it was a planned step by Colors vision,...

Like last time,.. Aseem Trivedi talked a lot about his field of protest

and BB had not released a single item on air,...

So,. Colors is responsible about what goes on the air

and how it would be interpreted as,..

JMHO,...

wooh sab toh thek hai but wat salman has to do with it 😲😆 kuch bhi 🤪BB contenstant kuch bhi bole seedhe sallu k ghar phuk don🤣

Originally posted by: arti07

wooh sab toh thek hai but wat salman has to do with it 😲😆 kuch bhi 🤪BB contenstant kuch bhi bole seedhe sallu k ghar phuk don🤣

rahul gandhi is not modi for good
modi is hungry for power
modi will lead india into dark age

Originally posted by: Sanu...

rahul gandhi is not modi for good
modi is hungry for power
modi will lead india into dark age

like he lead Gujarat to dark age with the higher than avg growth rate? I'd prefer that than congress taking India to prosperity like they've been doing in the last 5 years with all the scams, inflation and vadra scam

Originally posted by: ..Underworld..

Casting a slur on someone without proof is wrong and the victim is well within his rights to file a defamation case...freedom of speech doesn't mean you can say ANYTHING..people should read the rights in detail...there are some restrictions


Defamation: The clause (2) of Article 19 prevents any person from making any statement that injures the reputation of another. With the same view, defamation has been criminalised in India by inserting it into Section 499 of the I.P.C.

Do you know that such clauses only benefit the rich and the powerful? My colleague bitches about me a lot. If I go to the police I'll be laughed at. That it's Narendra Modi, makes it quite prominent. Sad reality of a democratic India. Laws only favor the elite. Also, the clip wasn't aired. These lengths are ridiculous. If politics isn't to be discussed, I don't know what is. Also it's misuse of power by the politicians- who supposedly run our country.

Originally posted by: Exprimere

Do you know that such clauses only benefit the rich and the powerful? My colleague bitches about me a lot. If I go to the police I'll be laughed at. That it's Narendra Modi, makes it quite prominent. Sad reality of a democratic India. Laws only favor the elite. Also, the clip wasn't aired. These lengths are ridiculous. If politics isn't to be discussed, I don't know what is. Also it's misuse of power by the politicians- who supposedly run our country.

hey...i didnt make the laws...and i dont think they benefit the rich and powerful...there are many rich people who have been convicted...yes it is tough to convict them but it's not because there's a fault in law...it's because of their links and ties with politicians who can then buy the witnesses, bribe the officers incharge, threaten the witness...

No one is stopping anyone from discussing politics, just that one should not accuse any public figure of something without any basis

but i do think there's one law that they should change...all the cost incurred by the victim in the whole court proceedings should be extracted from the guilty ...in usa it's like that if im not wrong

This clip was not even aired..why are they giving it such a lot of importance..filing a case against Ajaz and making everyone aware of what he said in a conversation with other bb members sounds like politically motivated publicity stunt.

Originally posted by: ..Underworld..

hey...i didnt make the laws...and i dont think they benefit the rich and powerful...there are many rich people who have been convicted...yes it is tough to convict them but it's not because there's a fault in law...it's because of their links and ties with politicians who can then buy the witnesses, bribe the officers incharge, threaten the witness...

No one is stopping anyone from discussing politics, just that one should not accuse any public figure of something without any basis

but i do think there's one law that they should change...all the cost incurred by the victim in the whole court proceedings should be extracted from the guilty ...in usa it's like that if im not wrong

That the US has such a law is commendable. However, Modi and victim sounds strange together. Also, maybe I'm skeptical about him coz of the Godhara massacre. I'm not exactly unaware you know. I also live in Maharashtra. I'm no stranger to political bullying. The financial capital of a country shuts down because of the whims and fancies of one party. Spare my entertainment, is all I'm asking.