Would Dipika support shree if he. . .

maaneetcraze thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#1
I wonder if Shree would have been a common man like Romil or deepak, with no cricket background nothing. Then would she blindly support him as she is trying to show the world now?
I bet she wouldn't.

A woman who has problem with a good person like Kv and willing to save surbhi over KV

Or has issues with Romil just because he has beaten her in the mind games, tasks. (Dont tell me she is upset because of that saiya bhaiya nonsense. She has been badmouthing romil from the start and saiya bhaiya issue is just an escape gate)

So the main point is Dipika has problems with everyone. She started this bhai bhai crap in greatest vigor only after when she was asked y she voted shree out (after shree came back from the SR)
She has used shree in the entire season and make him do all her dirty work.

Hypocrite of the season is Dipika kakkar
Has shree been a common man dipika would never even look at him.

Created

Last reply

Replies

23

Views

1.8k

Users

14

Likes

114

Frequent Posters

TheBoss thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 6 years ago
#2
No. Deepika is a prime example why my faith in power of money is restored.
theBoyWonder thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Easter Egg Contest Winner (2023) Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 6 years ago
#3
Well how does anyone know for sure if she would or wouldn't. Assumptions and facts are two very very different things. I thought Dipika has given enough reasons to criticize her for but the times are so tough that we have to hypothesize situations to bash her. 😆
saiba007 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#4
I don't agree I think she would have been the same to shree even if he was a common man.
luv2dance thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: theBoyWonder

Well how does anyone know for sure if she would or wouldn't. Assumptions and facts are two very very different things. I thought Dipika has given enough reasons to criticize her for but the times are so tough that we have to hypothesize situations to bash her. 😆


😆😆

Aww you are using too much logic. Not good for your brain 😛
theBoyWonder thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Easter Egg Contest Winner (2023) Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 6 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: luv2dance


😆😆

Aww you are using too much logic. Not good for your brain 😛


My bad! 😆
maaneetcraze thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: theBoyWonder

Well how does anyone know for sure if she would or wouldn't. Assumptions and facts are two very very different things. I thought Dipika has given enough reasons to criticize her for but the times are so tough that we have to hypothesize situations to bash her. 😆

There is a thing called hypothesis.
There is another thing which is called logic. By using ppl can determine a lot of things.
For example if 2+2=4 then 4+2 =6
We dont need to be mind readers to know this or ask our teacher.

Now coming to the point. If romil who is so much bad in dipika ji's eyes can be bad just because his sly nature of playing the game, surbhi can be fake because of her disgusting language then why not Shree?
There is a clear contradiction.
She is completely fake. About bashing i dont care but if someone is this much hypocritical then that catches my eye and yes sure she has given a lot more reasons to b disgusted by her.
maaneetcraze thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: TheBoss

No. Deepika is a prime example why my faith in power of money is restored.

And I got confirmation why woman are so oppressed on this era at this subcontinent.
Hail abusive mcp behaviour
maaneetcraze thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: saiba007

I don't agree I think she would have been the same to shree even if he was a common man.

Thanks for your opinion.

I have doubt she would be the same. If she can be against deepak who she calls is badtameez, hates surbhi cause of her language then looking at Shree and his crass nature it doesnt really make sense that she would think any differently than romil deepak or surbhi.

theBoyWonder thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Easter Egg Contest Winner (2023) Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 6 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: Solacesings

There is a thing called hypothesis.
There is another thing which is called logic. By using ppl can determine a lot of things.
For example if 2+2=4 then 4+2 =6
We dont need to be mind readers to know this or ask our teacher.

Now coming to the point. If romil who is so much bad in dipika ji's eyes can be bad just because his sly nature of playing the game, surbhi can be fake because of her disgusting language then why not Shree?
There is a clear contradiction.
She is completely fake. About bashing i dont care but if someone is this much hypocritical then that catches my eye and yes sure she has given a lot more reasons to b disgusted by her.


I might not know as much about logic and hypothesis but I know for sure that human behaviour, emotions etc are much more complex than a 4+2 = 6 math equation!

Well your premise is that Dipika has double standards for Sree and Romil's behaviour because Sree is a celeb. Dipika is also not very fond of KV for that matter and he happens to be a celeb! So the logic of her being friends/having double standards for celebs is WRONG! She could have a personal bias towards Sree (everyone does towards people they like) but that does not have anything to do with celeb/commoner issue as it being made out to be.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".