🏏 ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: PAK vs SL,Super 8🏏
🏏 ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026: NZ vs Eng 49th Match,27 Feb 🏏
Kya Rishta tyar hai ek aur leap lene ko? -SBS
US, Israel attack Iran : Trump announces ‘major combat operations’🔥
MAIRA HELPS MUKTI 28.2
Professional setback continues. Dp now out of The White Lotus
Alia Bhatt (for Gucci) & Diana Penty - at the Milan Fashion Week
IPL 2026 - (28 March to 31 May 2026)
Originally posted by: theBoyWonder
Well how does anyone know for sure if she would or wouldn't. Assumptions and facts are two very very different things. I thought Dipika has given enough reasons to criticize her for but the times are so tough that we have to hypothesize situations to bash her. 😆
Originally posted by: theBoyWonder
Well how does anyone know for sure if she would or wouldn't. Assumptions and facts are two very very different things. I thought Dipika has given enough reasons to criticize her for but the times are so tough that we have to hypothesize situations to bash her. 😆
No. Deepika is a prime example why my faith in power of money is restored.
Originally posted by: saiba007
I don't agree I think she would have been the same to shree even if he was a common man.
Originally posted by: Solacesings
There is a thing called hypothesis.There is another thing which is called logic. By using ppl can determine a lot of things.For example if 2+2=4 then 4+2 =6We dont need to be mind readers to know this or ask our teacher.Now coming to the point. If romil who is so much bad in dipika ji's eyes can be bad just because his sly nature of playing the game, surbhi can be fake because of her disgusting language then why not Shree?There is a clear contradiction.She is completely fake. About bashing i dont care but if someone is this much hypocritical then that catches my eye and yes sure she has given a lot more reasons to b disgusted by her.