Why did Saanjh uff Dusky lose - Page 7

@ sumz_d

Saanjh lost the case because she wasn't prepared to counter the factual evidences that went against Ayan in this case- cctv, medical report and eyewitness. When she narrated the whole incident she had no proof. If she thought or knew that Maye broke cameras she should have brought up the point right then. Second big mistake she did was assuming about med examination that too with so much confidence ( still remember that smirk). She knew Maya was assaulted by Ayaan, not raped unless Ayaan told her a complete false story..Then why would Maya not go for med exam? Her mistake was to try and base the entire case on one point- Maya is capable of lying and manipulating because she is a psycho. If she had fought the case to counter Maya's claim/ misunderstanding that Ayan tried to rape her and instead limited her arguements to make this a case of physical assault and intimidation only then Ayaan would have got less severe punishment.. Because what Ayaan did was wrong and punishable and evidences were against him.. Now Saanjh's arguments seem to suggest just the opposite..that Ayaan is completely innocent ( which he's not) and Maya staged everything ( again not true in my opinion ). Again eyewitness.. she had said Maya tripped Ayaan n made him fall so then why did she refrain Samay to appear in court? Big mistake..Afterall he only saw Ayaan on top of Maya which could have been explained. By influencing the only eyewitness, she lost credibility and hence the case.

Originally posted by: Penfolk

@ sumz_d

That's what I did. Not assume anything.

Neither did I assume maya's smile meant she's a criminal. Nor did I assume the key theory. I just asked the very basic non assumed question, do you think ayaan broke the cameras? If yes, when? How? If no, why did maya break them given that other than them no one had anything to do with the cameras.?

This is the most basic question leaving behind any assumption at all. Because if you can point out a single moment when Ayaan could've done that, I would keep shut understanding that yes there's a possibility of everything being not framed up at all.

@sumz

Saanjh fought the case poorly because she was emotionally overwhelmed. All those pent up emotions came out in the wrong place. She was unable to present evidence or counter the prosecution's points effectively.

Originally posted by: S.Stephy

If Saanjh had tied up Samay or something and prevented him from coming, then it can be called a crime. But here she just told him not to come. The ultimate choice was with Samay and more importantly, on the prosecution's side because they can always send a summon, which Samay will not be able to refuse. What Saanjh did can be called a mistake or even her foolishness.

Ultimately, with or without Samay, Saanjh's case was already weak only because the case itself was very tricky. On one hand, it is an attempt to rape case and the other hand, Ayaan had a tussle with Maya for the keys. All this makes the whole thing ambiguous. The only thing that could have proved Ayaan innocent would be a clear indication that Maya was framing Ayaan falsely. And there was no concrete proof for this.

Saanjh is moral queen. She asked the key eye witness to stay away and I completely agree to Astha it comes under the obstruction of justice and legal action. After asking Samay to stay away she comes and proclaims where I am there is truth. Really. If she was so sure of the truth, she shouldnt have made Samay stay away. If she had done that atleast have the courtesy not to claim moral high ground.

^^ oh really? What was the direct method Maya used to keep Arjun away from Ayaan? Can u elaborate? What was the direct method Maya used to keep Arjun tied to her? Oh yeah, she literally tied him 😆

Originally posted by: lumos_31

^^ oh really? What was the direct method Maya used to keep Arjun away from Ayaan? Can u elaborate? What was the direct method Maya used to keep Arjun tied to her? Oh yeah, she literally tied him 😆

Yes if a lawyer claims truth is where I am then that lawyer has to be ethically 100% correct. No tedha method is expected from such a lawyer. Else just fight the case for what it is. I only told Saanjh cannot claim morality after asking the eye witness not to come. In cases like that of Maya usually the protoganist plays the game straight and fails, then start using tedha methods. Here at first go itself she asked Samay not to come thus losing the moral high ground.