Why did Saanjh uff Dusky lose

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

astha36

@astha36

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#41

How is it that Saanjh is a lawyer but doesn't even know that making stories is not going to prove anything in court? She put everything in a sequence and told the judge and I thought it's good, she is building the premise. I thought there will be some witnesses or evidence now that she'll put forth. But that was it. She had no proof, nothing. Only that story, only talk. Somebody on this thread said that it's because of her inexperience that she didn't know she will need proofs. Are you kidding me? How do you pass law exams and not even know that PROOF is the only thing that will win you the case?? It is inexcusable. It is lousy writing and the makers should have thought it through. Itna stupid koi nahi hota. I am even more surprised that people are actually defending her character for this stupidity lol.

Maya is smart but I want her to be smarter than this. I want her to be even more calculating along with being passionate. It seems she acts on impulse a lot, it would be more interesting if there were more smart manoeuvres from her side. Can't expect smartness from any other character sadly.

Edited by astha36 - 8 years ago

Quote

BIaddict

@BIaddict

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#42

it is Sanj's job to defend Ayan and that is exactly what she did and that is exactly why she did not call Samay as her witness because Samay's testimony will hurt Ayan's case and strengthen Maya's case. It is prosecutors job to get witnesses to strengthen their case. If Sanj was immoral she would have asked Samay to lie which she did not. She just asked Samay to stay away which is not a crime.

Sanj tried her best to defend Ayan but completely underestimated maya. Ayan went to jail because of maya not because of Sanj

Edited by BIaddict - 8 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

shruthiravi

@shruthiravi

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#43

Maya is a criminal. I had accepted it long back. But saanjh if she is different from Maya she has to show ethics at the time of moral conflict. Ethics is taught to her by parents. She is a law graduate. So by asking samay to keep away saanjh has committed ethical crime and then claimed moral high ground accusing Maya.For me before accusing others of ethics atleast keep your ethics clean. Maya criminal doesn't give right for saanjh to do what she did or rather the right to do ethical crime.that only shows if she is in Maya position she will also do crime. You can't use another person action to justify ur action

Quote

SStephy

@SStephy

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#44

If Saanjh had tied up Samay or something and prevented him from coming, then it can be called a crime. But here she just told him not to come. The ultimate choice was with Samay and more importantly, on the prosecution's side because they can always send a summon, which Samay will not be able to refuse. What Saanjh did can be called a mistake or even her foolishness.

Ultimately, with or without Samay, Saanjh's case was already weak only because the case itself was very tricky. On one hand, it is an attempt to rape case and the other hand, Ayaan had a tussle with Maya for the keys. All this makes the whole thing ambiguous. The only thing that could have proved Ayaan innocent would be a clear indication that Maya was framing Ayaan falsely. And there was no concrete proof for this.

Quote

Kaushitaki

@Penkie06

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

#45

Originally posted by: sumz_d

But how do you know Maya temepered the proofs? How do you know Ayaan is indeed innocent?

The actions and filthy dialogues of Ayaan don't fit the so called Keys and Kick theory.

Problem is we are assuming a lot. I think we should wait and see first.

The truth will eventually be revealed afterall.

When did Ayaan break the cameras?

Quote

BIaddict

@BIaddict

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#46

Originally posted by: shruthiravi
Maya is a criminal. I had accepted it long back. But saanjh if she is different from Maya she has to show ethics at the time of moral conflict. Ethics is taught to her by parents. She is a law graduate. So by asking samay to keep away saanjh has committed ethical crime and then claimed moral high ground accusing Maya.For me before accusing others of ethics atleast keep your ethics clean. Maya criminal doesn't give right for saanjh to do what she did or rather the right to do ethical crime.that only shows if she is in Maya position she will also do crime. You can't use another person action to justify ur action

Totally agree on your last line you can't use another person's action to justify your actions. It is not Vandana, Sanj or Arjun to be blamed for Maya's actions. It is maya alone to be blamed. Similarly Sanj's actions are totally on Sanj nobody else. Sanj is not some moral queen, no where in the story it is told so. She is presented as a normal human being with mistakes and blunders. The difference between the two is maya knowingly manipulates situations to knowingly hurt others. Sanj's mistakes are normal human mistakes not an intentional effort. You are assuming that Sanj's actions are to separate Artya, in the show they have not shown us that Sanj is doing the stuff she does to deliberately separate Arya. Similarly you are assuming Sanj's intentioons on court case to show maya bad not to save Ayan. In the show it is not shown that as her intentions. She was attacking maya as her case was built on the argument that maya wants sole control of Arjun and it totally obsessed with Arjun, she wanted his family away and for that she staged this rape case. Her questions in the court was to paint this picture not to show maya bad so she can break Arya. Unfortunately she underestimated maya and what she would do. Here in Sanj's inexperienced state she started blabbering, she lacks thinking on the feet skill and she lost the case. But saying that Ayan going to jail is Sanj's fault is extreme. It is maya who fabricated the rape story with the soul intention to punishing sharma family and to break Arjun away from his family for good (of course it is not proven yet, but I believe will be proved soon)

Edited by BIaddict - 8 years ago

Quote

anshvi

@anshvi

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 8 years ago

#47

Originally posted by: shruthiravi
Maya is a criminal. I had accepted it long back. But saanjh if she is different from Maya she has to show ethics at the time of moral conflict. Ethics is taught to her by parents. She is a law graduate. So by asking samay to keep away saanjh has committed ethical crime and then claimed moral high ground accusing Maya.For me before accusing others of ethics atleast keep your ethics clean. Maya criminal doesn't give right for saanjh to do what she did or rather the right to do ethical crime.that only shows if she is in Maya position she will also do crime. You can't use another person action to justify ur action

I guess same goes for all other characters as well..all are ethically wrong some where or the other...all are flawed

Arjun - ethically wrong for lying in the witness box

Samay - for agreeing to not appear in court...Saanjh didn't force him..ultimately it was his own will to not come in the court.

Saanjh - for asking Samay not to come

Maya - we all know the reasons.

All these people were ethically wrong.

But as some are saying that Saanjh is a CRIMINAL is wrong...Yes she can be called ethically wrong but certainly not a criminal.

Quote

Zorinacatherine

@Zorinacatherine

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

#48

Originally posted by: Penfolk

When did Ayaan break the cameras?

And when did he create these much wounds on her.

Was that done by Arjun or Samay or some random person.

Or did some one else try to raoe Maya after Ayan went.Or did she just stand there for soneone to make all these wounds.

Edited by Zorinacatherine - 8 years ago

Quote

BIaddict

@BIaddict

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#49

Originally posted by: anshvi

I guess same goes for all other characters as well..all are ethically wrong some where or the other...all are flawed

Arjun - ethically wrong for lying in the witness box
Samay - for agreeing to not appear in court...Saanjh didn't force him..ultimately it was his own will to not come in the court.
Saanjh - for asking Samay not to come
Maya - we all know the reasons.

All these people were ethically wrong.
But as some are saying that Saanjh is a CRIMINAL is wrong...Yes she can be called ethically wrong but certainly not a criminal.

Maya is not just wrong, maya has committed criminal offenses but is able to prevent it from getting proven.