Originally posted by: prerna4rishav
Well I agree he married Santu for his own selfish reasons, but he saved Santu's life from being destroyed.. Anyways I am not going into that arguments.. Becoz if he won't have married Santu, Nanaji's family would be abandoned..
But Hiten-Khemi marriage can not take place for such simple reason, forced or unforced, they ARE maasi-bhaanjaa.. If Hiten is DM's son, then the relationbship of HK is cheap..
Love is not everything in life.. it CAN happen twice.. if tried.. U gotta marry a person whom ur family think is best for you.. that's the custom here.. And if u marry going against ur family, the consequences are not so good in future.. Marriage is not a ride or love.. it's a committment..
Hiten-Khemi's love was nice.. I love them.. But the step they have taken is NO way acceptable for me
P.S -- Here I meant 'ONE' by 'U'.. Nothing personal😃
saved santu's life?how?can u explain me...
dont u think she would have been married to a guy of her age if dm had not shown his mahaanta?like shashaank was all set to marry her and this shaadi tootna would not have been a problem for him.dm married her for his own selfish motive-business+kundali+logo ki jayjaykaar.as the rishta which broke was proposed by dm he wanted to be called mahaan and not makkaaar.
as for h-k relationship,I have already put my point of view and people who believe in following their heart and not involving head and brains to build heart-heart relationships will defintely agree with me..
I feel the definition of customs,traditions and family values differs from one individual to another.u dont have to show off to prove your loyalty towards it.orthodoxism,liberalism and modernism are all a matter of perception how u take it..
Edited by payalgarg - 16 years ago