What is Mangala so scared of? DTN pg 27 - Page 2

Originally posted by: Shinya

I really admire the thoughts of people here.👏 How virtuous are they to blame mangala for not giving anandi's daughter all that she rightly deserved as the daughter of rich and wealthy !👏

Who even mentioned money and luxuries here? Making sure a child eats and sleeps well is called luxury? Or keeping a child away from abuses is luxury?

So what if the poor unfortunate victim mother did not care for her child's safety? So what if akhiraj wanted to kill the child?

For the nth time Anandi is the mother and no one other than her will care more about her child's safety

But tell us, what great did this selfish woman mangala do by saving the child ?

Wasn't the girl better off dead?

What difference would it make to anandi anyway?

Well it was in the destiny of the child to live. No one can control life and death. Mangala couldn't save her own husbands life. Neither could she save Gopal. She tried saving Nimboli and was successful. It wasn't that she had to put up s huge battle against Akhiraj to save her. Anandi had to go through bullets and hence lost her child

Anandi is well off financially, she has people to love her, take care of her and give her shelter in their house indefinitely, she has another child to raise.. who cares if one child dies?

Why do people keep both of their eyes rather than donate one because one is good enough to see. That's the value of a child to its mother.

Why should a poor helpless woman, who was a victim herself, ever feel pity for another woman's child when the mother herself did not pity her own child??

She needn't feel anything for someone else's child. Who said she did anyway? The whole argument is that she doesn't care for the child. She can spend all her time instead in getting herself rejuvenated out of her own victim status.

Okay, She saved the child, fine. Thanks to her. No big issues... Anyone would do that.

But she committed a big crime by giving love to that child. How dare she love the child? How dare she got attached to the child.

Did she not know that the child was anandi's and her duty was like a caretaker to keep the child safe and alive till the mother was found?

The problem is she wants the child without doing much for her. Anandi thinks she has done a lot hence she has entrusted her with her daughter. She never bothered much about her safety. It was just the one time she saved her life and that's what she is seeking a return favour for. Her love cannot be called motherly love from any angle. She felt pity for a poor kidnapped girl and gave her some solace. Still can't be called motherly love. And now she has nothing much in life to do hence her target is Nimboli. Whereas for Anandi it's her daughter.

Hats off to all those who enlightened me today.👎🏼 A BIG Thank you. 🤪

Originally posted by: Shinya

I get what you all are saying. No need to give explanations.

To cut the story short, what people are asking is this - why could that one prisoner not set the other younger prisoner free or make the younger prisoner's life less miserable ?

The answer to this is - a prisoner in a jail cannot take away another prisoner's pains unless he sets himself free first.

Originally posted by: fast trak