One has to listen to - Page 7

Sanchi giving money to pandit for a particular date for her engagement and marriage cannot even be called a bribe. The pandit is not a government servant doing some illegal work in return of some money. Pandits do take money to advice about shubh muhurat etc. and giving money to pandit is not a crime in court of law. Similarly, Sanchi's faking her change in attitude or badmouthing her future in-laws etc. are not crime in court of law. The court cannot say that since Sanchi has done such things, Jagya was right in breaking the engagement. They will only decide whether Sanchi is guilty of attempting to suicide and whether Jagya is guilty of abatement of suicide. The decision will be Sanchi is guilty of attempting to suicide but Jagya is not guilty of abatement of suicide. Jagya's past may also be before the court if Anandi, anyone from Singh family has the courage to tell the truth, but the court will not decide what he did wrong in past because the courts decide the case that has been filed and I think- the cases are attempt to suicide and abatement of suicide. [CVs will be foolish if they show both the cases being heard at the same time in the same court. But considering they have already made too much fun of education, profession and even court cases, so most probably they will again make fun of the law of the land for the sake of emotional drama]

when a person give gift or money to other person dishonestly for his or her own favour .that money term as bribe .here sanchi give money to pandit for her own benefit and that too dishonestly so sanchi giving money to pandit is indeed call bribe .

Originally posted by: surabhi01

when a person give gift or money to other person dishonestly for his or her own favour .that money term as bribe .here sanchi give money to pandit for her own benefit and that too dishonestly so sanchi giving money to pandit is indeed call bribe .

pandit has already given date of 17th .sanchi knew this and she also knew from pandit that sixteenth date is not auspecious day of engagement but still she give money to pandit to change engagement date from 17 to sixteen for her own benefit which is indeed term as bribe .when anyone give money to another person for improper procedure of work it is term as bribe .here sanchi give money for her own benefit that too for improper procedure of engagement hence sanchi giving money to pandit is call bribe .

Originally posted by: surabhi01

pandit has already given date of 17th .sanchi knew this and she also knew from pandit that sixteenth date is not auspecious day of engagement but still she give money to pandit to change engagement date from 17 to sixteen for her own benefit which is indeed term as bribe .when anyone give money to another person for improper procedure of work it is term as bribe .here sanchi give money for her own benefit that too for improper procedure of engagement hence sanchi giving money to pandit is call bribe .

This fact will make her look like a manipulator than a criminal. Maybe criminal tendencies. But not serious offence.

it is whether serious offences or light offences but it is indeed term as bribe .if this is not bribe then what it should be call ?

Originally posted by: surabhi01

pandit has already given date of 17th .sanchi knew this and she also knew from pandit that sixteenth date is not auspecious day of engagement but still she give money to pandit to change engagement date from 17 to sixteen for her own benefit which is indeed term as bribe .when anyone give money to another person for improper procedure of work it is term as bribe .here sanchi give money for her own benefit that too for improper procedure of engagement hence sanchi giving money to pandit is call bribe .

well even bh pandit said that how sixteenth date become auspicious for engagement day

yes bh is at fault for not finding truth but sanchi giving money to pandit is indeed term as bribe yes it can very easy proove by people who come in engagement by cd it can be prove .by panchang it can be proove and pandit can also say about this

Yeah

Anandi doesn't follow what she preaches and i dun think Ganga is being

dramatic and she went to BH as Lal singh is missing (I think so)


Just my pov

First and most important of all
Leaves
I know you and everyone else here only through the posts they make but I like to think that by exchanging our views through these posts we are actually becoming friends. And speaking for myself I really don't think that we stop being friends just because we have different views regarding a particular topic. In fact we are friends only if we can exchange different views without worrying whether that will affect the friendship.
Sooo basically what I want to say is that even if you maintain that sky is blue and I say it is red, we will continue to exchange our views as we are friends😊
And that matters more than this show

Therefore here goes my views on your topic

Anandi
Definitely she has double standards.BAD
And yesterday as Skep and some others pointed out she was extremely tactless. There is a way to say things that she didn't follow. But I also did not like Shiv's and Ira's single minded revenge mentality. They didn't care about what was right then, it was just--their baby had been hurt, they wanted payback. Didn't like it

Ganga
Although I do not appreciate her crying too much, yesterday I felt she was justified.
She is a young girl, thrown into a new world a year ago. She has recently been bashed right and left for no fault of hers. On top of that her husband just got arrested. Lal Singh's out of town. She ran to the only person who could help her husband- his family. And she screamed because
a. She was terrified for him
b. She can't enter the house

In th JaGan relationship, it will almost always be Jagya's role as the caretaker. He is older, has the benefit of experience and his is the dominant character when compared to this soft, scared woman who is finding her feet slowly. She is his ...perspective
I was able to forgive him because of her and his care of her partly

So as regards Jagya going through court with courage and calm. I agree with you