One has to listen to - Page 8

Originally posted by: SPuja

The pandit has to give a date - and padits do differ on such things. Singhs should have consulted their own pandit - in fact it is tradition that both boys and girls pandit give their views. It is not like bribing the court official to get fake marriage certificate or like bribing the traffic police to ignore the violation of traffic rules. What Sanchi did was morally incorrect, but she did not break any law.

Originally posted by: groucho

I think when your husband is arrested. ..you don't stop to think...you just go!!! You go get help from the one person who blessed you...the person who believes in Jagya...BHAIRON...the others just happen to live there.

I agree about Anandi...and as I said before she must finally speak out or her character is as good as the chair she sits on.

Originally posted by: ranitha

First and most important of all
Leaves
I know you and everyone else here only through the posts they make but I like to think that by exchanging our views through these posts we are actually becoming friends. And speaking for myself I really don't think that we stop being friends just because we have different views regarding a particular topic. In fact we are friends only if we can exchange different views without worrying whether that will affect the friendship.
Sooo basically what I want to say is that even if you maintain that sky is blue and I say it is red, we will continue to exchange our views as we are friends😊
And that matters more than this show
APOLOGIES FOR THE REPLY IN CAPS...VERY DIFFICULT TO MANOEVER MY PHONE. ..just like the CV'S

Absolutely spot on...I have always maintained that the Greatest thing about India Forums is that so many diverse people can interact..exchange views and form virtual friendships...😊
Therefore here goes my views on your topic

Anandi
Definitely she has double standards.BAD
And yesterday as Skep and some others pointed out she was extremely tactless. There is a way to say things that she didn't follow. But I also did not like Shiv's and Ira's single minded revenge mentality. They didn't care about what was right then, it was just--their baby had been hurt, they wanted payback. Didn't like it
TOTALLY AGREE
Ganga
Although I do not appreciate her crying too much, yesterday I felt she was justified.
She is a young girl, thrown into a new world a year ago. She has recently been bashed right and left for no fault of hers. On top of that her husband just got arrested. Lal Singh's out of town. She ran to the only person who could help her husband- his family. And she screamed because
a. She was terrified for him
b. She can't enter the house - IT WAS MENTIONED IN HER FEAR WHY DID SHE NOT RUN IN TO THE HOUSE...my POV...have CV's ever paid attention to continuity???

In th JaGan relationship, it will almost always be Jagya's role as the caretaker. He is older, has the benefit of experience and his is the dominant character when compared to this soft, scared woman who is finding her feet slowly. She is his ...perspective
I was able to forgive him because of her and his care of her partly

So as regards Jagya going through court with courage and calm. I agree with you

I RATHER LIKE THE character of Jagya now...we oldies have gone through many opinions of him in the past.. so I sincerely hope what you say will happen...I just prefer to wait and watch from past experiences and being hopeful.

GREAT POST⭐️

Originally posted by: surabhi01

yes bh is at fault for not finding truth but sanchi giving money to pandit is indeed term as bribe yes it can very easy proove by people who come in engagement by cd it can be prove .by panchang it can be proove and pandit can also say about this

sanchi gain by this that she stop jagya from going mangalore to meet ganga so that jagya should be near to her .

Originally posted by: groucho

What you say is true...proving Saanchi bribed the pundit is of no use to anyone...but if it is a good lawyer he will show a pattern of lying...so if she lies about changing dates...she could also be lying about everything else...this will go towards creating a doubt about Saanchi. This is what should happen but in BV who knows????😕

Originally posted by: NeerajaGirish

Hi. I am mostly a silent reader in this forum. But I amazed with the way people are defending Jagya that he has reformed and he is very innocent. If he had reformed and leant from his mistakes, he would have first said I would need sometime to think of marriage when the proposal came, siting that I would not like to create any problems between two families instead of acting as sacrificing to make Anandi happy. If he had done for keeping Anandi happy, when Sanchi's truth came out why didn't he think of ways to not let Anandi face any brunt of his decision by discussing it with his father.

It is so easy to keep on blaming Anandi for whatever happens. She didn't speak and didn't tell Jagya that she did not wanted him to marry Sanchi etc. but as a daughter in law of a house, would a good or idealistic bahu wash dirty linen of her sister in law to outsiders.

I am also amazed by Bhairon behaviour. He did not even care to soothe Sumitra's fears when she was scared about Ratan Singh, he did not even for a second think what effect Jagya's action would effect Anandi

Originally posted by: surabhi01

it is another matter that finacee want her future husband near her or not but sanchi give money to pandit is indeed a bribe .if she want jagya to be near her she could have tell straight jagya that i do not want u go mangalore to meet ganga .why apply wrong path to achieve jagya