In defence of Ganga - Page 6

Do we have a choice specially in indian serials.If you search for so much logics then we will have to stop watching serials.Watching it seriously but we also watch it as entertainment. We should give some creative liberty as we don't have options.Its better than plastic surgeries and reincarnation and same faces blongs to thousands of people.Thank God bvs are atleast not showing those kind of things even after five years.Though they have started showing shivs humshakal.We are not dumb here who are watching even dumber serial and giving excuses for irrationality.We are not defending irrationality,we are expressing our views.The things cvs are showing are atleast acceptable as they are showing positive things like a divorce girls sasural can be her mayika after her marriage and people can give shelter to a helpless girl who doesn't have any relation and think her as daughter.

Some creative liberty can be given to serials/films/plays, but what I pointed out are utterly irrational. Ex-sasural cannot be mayaka for a girl at least as long as her ex-husband is living there. Giving shelter to a needy person is alright, but when it is almost certain that she will end up as bahu of the house is it rational to show her living-in there before marriage? And why is Ganga helpless? This is a story and writers can make her strong or weak. A lot of women live independently with dignity even doing odd jobs.The Ganga after entering haveli is not the Ganga they introduced.

In dadisa's house nobody is treating Ganga as would be bahu. They are searching for suitable girls for Jagya. So question of living in does not arise S.Puja

Ganga cannot become a strong woman overnight. It took years for anandi to become one.

So your argument is not tenable.

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

In dadisa's house nobody is treating Ganga as would be bahu. They are searching for suitable girls for Jagya. So question of living in does not arise S.Puja

Ganga cannot become a strong woman overnight. It took years for anandi to become one.

So your argument is not tenable.

To me Ganga was strong woman before entering badi haveli.Ganga was not like Anandi. I said living-in because viewers are almost certain that she will end up as bahu and even CVs indicated this with khoon bhari maang. This is a story and therefore, they could have easily kept Ganga somewhere else instead of badi haveli, if they wanted to marry Ganga-Jagya. My objection is just to the situation created by Cvs, I am not against Jagya-ganga match.

Ganga was strong due to the rough situations faced by her. As ganga mingled with somewhat cultured people, even she became less rough.

And CVs are leading us to think that ganga may become bahu. But jaitsar folk dont and so they dont find anything wrong in keeping ganga in their house.

You are mixing the haveli people's viewpoint with that of the readers' viewpoint which is not correct.

Sumitra is not a cow .. nor she is selfish. Right now she is just insecure. This insecurity was first brewed by her own family with the constant comparison of an outsider to her fav child Anandi, for whom she let her son go.

In what way ganga is threatening sumitra to feel insecure? How is it her fault if her family members see in her anandi? If sanchi's molestor's beat Jagya, will she give sanchi the same treatment?

If she is insecure, she can always discuss things with Bhairon and he would have assured her.

If insecurity means shouting at a little kid and refusing to even touch him, it is called something else.

Yes, they are butchering sumitra's character just the way they butchered gehna's character during nandu's quarrel with his friend.

I don't think insecurities should accepted as an excuse.Gauri had insecurites so she behaved like what she shouldn't have.Wrong reasons can't and should not be termed as insecurity.Ira,Sumi,sanchi all are wrong at this point but they have their reasons why they are behaving like this.Ira is doing the same thing continuously.Sanchi is out of sanity.For sumi it is the first time but her behaviour can't create any sympathy as she is ungrateful whatever ganga did for singhs.If everyone is praising ganga and saying she is almost like anandi it is not ganga's fault.So this time sumi is absolutely wrong and can't be excused.I hope she comes to sense soon.I am finding it difficult to hate her.

I agree with Suchi Sumi's character is indeed butchered by cvs in a nonsense way she has never been like this Some characteristics are present in her character but many newly forced One can understand a mother's heart who has seen her son close to death here she definitely will not want to have any such risk again In her place every mother will think like this and will want her son to leave that matter in which his life will be risked she will have to lose him but the way she is behaving with Ganga thats wrong and seeing Sumi's character so far this is abrupt change in her character she has never been so harsh

Sid,don't remind me of butchering characters.Its painful.And sometimes they unnecessarily butcher a character so much that it becomes difficult for others to accept that character back.Their is a limit to butcher a character whom we adore.I am saying it again why can't they keep some character same as before.There was no need to do this.If sumi can be kept the most adorable mother in law for five years then was it really needed to do this!