Poll

Is Toral Rasputra talented actress and excellent choice for Anandi?

Login To Vote
Bubi thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#1
Since all comments of support by Toral Rasputra funs are identical, the same content with different word order, I would like to know what you really think of her acting skills and talent. In this way you will help me figure out if it's just my wrong impression.
Thanks in advance!

Created

Last reply

Replies

49

Views

6.7k

Users

26

Likes

223

Frequent Posters

libsrocks thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#2
excellent is not the word i would use for now...even Prats was not excellent for me...till now only Surekhaji, Shashank and sometimes Siddharth has come across to me as excellent in BV Toral is good if not perfect but yes i like her with Sid...she is improving gradually and i have faith in her that she too will be able to mark up to viewer's expectations
miracal76 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#3
Even i do like toral wid sid,prat has gud face bt i nevr lkd her personality..she is so lackng in height..i nevr found extraordinary acting of prats infact toral has gud dailouge delivry than prat..sidyusha never wrkd fr me out of d charactr of ansh...prat is suitable fr 18 yrs old charactr..bt nw anandi must hw crosed 25 of her age.. n toral is suitabl fr dat charactr..prat cannot carrry of well d charactr of mothr wch toral can do..ny hw i lk toral in many ways than prat..i nevr watch bv fr prat evr..its fr sid i used to watch
Bubi thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: libsrocks

excellent is not the word i would use for now...even Prats was not excellent for me...till now only Surekhaji, Shashank and sometimes Siddharth has come across to me as excellent in BV Toral is good if not perfect but yes i like her with Sid...she is improving gradually and i have faith in her that she too will be able to mark up to viewer's expectations


Thanks for the nice explanation. I agree with you about Surekha, Shashank and Siddharth. I think that Anjum Farooqi was perfect ih the role of Gauri.
Bubi thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: miracal76

Even i do like toral wid sid,prat has gud face bt i nevr lkd her personality..she is so lackng in height..i nevr found extraordinary acting of prats infact toral has gud dailouge delivry than prat..sidyusha never wrkd fr me out of d charactr of ansh...prat is suitable fr 18 yrs old charactr..bt nw anandi must hw crosed 25 of her age.. n toral is suitabl fr dat charactr..prat cannot carrry of well d charactr of mothr wch toral can do..ny hw i lk toral in many ways than prat..i nevr watch bv fr prat evr..its fr sid i used to watch


Thanks for your opinion. I didn't watch BV becouse of Siddharth, for me it was an interesting story and good actors were perfectly chosen for the respective roles. Pratyusha for me was great, even more becouse she was talented rookie and her looks fit for the role of Anandi. For me, and I'm not from India she was the personification of an Indian girl with a difficult life story.
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
#6
Anandi was played by three different actresses.One is a child and the other two are grownups.
Avika is a naturally gifted actress and has a lot of charishma.She could connect to people in avery short span of time.She was the reason the show balika vadhu has become hit.

Neither Toral nor Pratyusha can be called natural actresses or gifted actresses.
Both need to work hard to come up with convincing performances.
Both of them deliver very good performance if the scene is written well.

As for the face it just needs time to get used to a new face.It will be difficult because the character is something you have been seeing for almost five years and one tends to associate the face of the actor with the character.

Pratyusha was quite bad when she started off and she tried to imitate Avika and she failed miserably and infact Pratyusha also had to face the same kind of ruckus from the people that Toral is facing now.

It took a long time for the show to pick up after it took a beating after the leap.

Pratyusha was good in some scenes and bad in other scenes.There are some track failed because of her performance she couldn't bring out some of the aspects of Anandi succesfully.

Same thing with Toral.She also is good in some scenes and some scenes not very good.Like she was good in Saturday's episode.

As for Pratyusha embodying the Indian woman and beauty of Indian woman - that will be an insult to Indian woman.Not every Indian woman looks like her but they do look just as beautiful.

It is not Pratyusha who personifies the Indian woman it is Anandi who personifies Indian woman.In my opinion it is Anandi who made Pratyusha look beautiful not the other way round.





Edited by aparnauma - 12 years ago
Aashima. thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#7
why are you still stuck at this point only even if she is not talented ...she is the one playing Anandi and we have to tolerate her only ...be it good /bad/worst...and if you are asking just for an opinion then she is good at some point ...little off at some other...but she is improving which is evident in her acting ..so till now she is good for me 😊😊
753037 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: aparnauma

Anandi was played by three different actresses.One is a child and the other two are grownups.
Avika is a naturally gifted actress and has a lot of charishma.She could connect to people in avery short span of time.She was the reason the show balika vadhu has become hit.

Neither Toral nor Pratyusha can be called natural actresses or gifted actresses.
Both need to work hard to come up with convincing performances.
Both of them deliver very good performance if the scene is written well.

As for the face it just needs time to get used to a new face.It will be difficult because the character is something you have been seeing for almost five years and one tends to associate the face of the actor with the character.

Pratyusha was quite bad when she started off and she tried to imitate Avika and she failed miserably and infact Pratyusha also had to face the same kind of ruckus from the people that Toral is facing now.

It took a long time for the show to pick up after it took a beating after the leap.

Pratyusha was good in some scenes and bad in other scenes.There are some track failed because of her performance she couldn't bring out some of the aspects of Anandi succesfully.

Same thing with Toral.She also is good in some scenes and some scenes not very good.Like she was good in Saturday's episode.

As for Pratyusha embodying the Indian woman and beauty of Indian woman - that will be an insult to Indian woman.Not every Indian woman looks like her but they do look just as beautiful.

It is not Pratyusha who is a personifies the Indian woman it is Anandi who personifies Indian woman.In my opinion it is Anandi who made Pratyusha look beautiful not the other way round.






@ blue - Very well said aparna!! Exactly my thoughts!

That was the funniest statement i ever read. Pratyusha personifying Indian women? It was Anandi maybe but NEVER the actress.
Vermelha thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: miracal76

Even i do like toral wid sid,prat has gud face bt i nevr lkd her personality..she is so lackng in height..i nevr found extraordinary acting of prats infact toral has gud dailouge delivry than prat..sidyusha never wrkd fr me out of d charactr of ansh...prat is suitable fr 18 yrs old charactr..bt nw anandi must hw crosed 25 of her age.. n toral is suitabl fr dat charactr..prat cannot carrry of well d charactr of mothr wch toral can do..ny hw i lk toral in many ways than prat..i nevr watch bv fr prat evr..its fr sid i used to watch



Reading and it is hard for me to believe what I am reading

lacking in height? prats acting is not extraordinary? 🤣🤣

and how you know she can not carry off well the character of mother? Prats can do anything she wants! Because she is simply amazing!
Megha from NBT is 20 something and she plays a mother of grown-up children.

And i think your last sentence actually explained me why you don't like Prats and why Sidyusha never worked for you😆😆


Bubi thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: aparnauma

Anandi was played by three different actresses.One is a child and the other two are grownups.
Avika is a naturally gifted actress and has a lot of charishma.She could connect to people in avery short span of time.She was the reason the show balika vadhu has become hit.

Neither Toral nor Pratyusha can be called natural actresses or gifted actresses.
Both need to work hard to come up with convincing performances.
Both of them deliver very good performance if the scene is written well.

As for the face it just needs time to get used to a new face.It will be difficult because the character is something you have been seeing for almost five years and one tends to associate the face of the actor with the character.

Pratyusha was quite bad when she started off and she tried to imitate Avika and she failed miserably and infact Pratyusha also had to face the same kind of ruckus from the people that Toral is facing now.

It took a long time for the show to pick up after it took a beating after the leap.

Pratyusha was good in some scenes and bad in other scenes.There are some track failed because of her performance she couldn't bring out some of the aspects of Anandi succesfully.

Same thing with Toral.She also is good in some scenes and some scenes not very good.Like she was good in Saturday's episode.

As for Pratyusha embodying the Indian woman and beauty of Indian woman - that will be an insult to Indian woman.Not every Indian woman looks like her but they do look just as beautiful.

It is not Pratyusha who is a personifies the Indian woman it is Anandi who personifies Indian woman.In my opinion it is Anandi who made Pratyusha look beautiful not the other way round.






I agree with you that time is important factor for the acceptance of some actor for a certain role. However, this isn't a show of twenty episodes. I don't see any purpose that any series lasts this long. For me, Pratyusha was excellent in any regard for the role of Anandi. And in private, she looks good. Tastes are different. So my opinion of her as Anandi and her personally in any case is not an insult. I'm sorry if you understood it that way. If someone gain international populaity by playing certain role, isn't it something that should be valued? Regardless of whether you personaly like it or not you have to respect the opinion of many people around the world. Just like I respect your opinion, and becouse of that word INSULT shouldn't be in this place. I'll be very proud of her and her success if I was from India.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".