code of conduct - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

115

Views

8.6k

Users

27

Likes

395

Frequent Posters

elasingh thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#31
Agr ideology ki baat hai to I always endup supporting a person who is falling. For me life is not white and black , it is mostly grey.
mocking_bird thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: elasingh

@ Suchi I absolutely hate os and all that. Anyway I m not much of a writer. Most of the gaga supporters are not.


@elasingh. You are a very good writer and there are no two opinions about it. I personally like many of your posts.
It is true that I may not agree with your view points all the time,but, that does not mean that you are not a good writer. As I said, we tend to look at things from our own personal perspectives. I do not bow my head in front of GOD because, I always feel that HE is unduly harsh on me and HE has snatched more things from than HE has given. But,that does not mean that I look down upon people who are great believers. 😊
sarandha thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#33
I really first think everybody needs to realise is that a public forum is meant for everyone to express their opinions through democratic debate and discussion - whether it is in conformity with what the majority thinks or not . Nobody owes a forum once its made public . We all have to respect contradictory opinions.

This does not imply ofcourse that use of abusive language or abusive terms which vitiate the atmosphere can be employed by ANYONE against any individual or in a way which can hurt people's sensitivities about expression of public moralities.

So while one can bash fictitous characters , if we use derogatory terms which people find offensive in the manner in which they look at women, men, relationships - then people have a right to protest.

Also serials are meant to express through the medium of fiction and fictional characters the complexities of our lives and situations we might find ourselves implicated in without necessarily glorifying or condemning anything in a black and white manner. Human relationships are complex and narratives are meant to portray these grey areas in a way in which we can connect with them as ordinary human beings who live in a multilayered society and have both good and bad traits . Taking black and white positions and then being intolerant of others opinions in these matters does not lead us anywhere niether does it serve the basic purpose behind creating this and other such forums - meant to promote public debate and discussion.
Edited by sarandha - 13 years ago
elasingh thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#34

@elasingh. You are a very good writer and there are no two opinions about it. I personally like many of your posts.
It is true that I may not agree with your view points all the time,but, that does not mean that you are not a good writer. As I said, we tend to look at things from our own personal perspectives. I do not bow my head in front of GOD because, I always feel that HE is unduly harsh on me and HE has snatched more things from than HE has given. But,that does not mean that I look down upon people who are great believers. 😊
Thanks. Don't know what to say? Strangely I too have complaints against God and they are same as yours.
AnjanaYYZ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#35
Rohini

I appreciate your post. I encourage you to report the posts you find offensive and let the Moderators sort it out. Also, if you are interested in moderation then please do apply for the Development Team - there is an application button near the top. Also PM *Shruti* and/or "Priya" if you are interested.

____________________
Everyone has Freedom of Speech to express their viewpoints. However, hate speech is a boundary to that in most of the "civilized" world.

Coming to this Forum, at some point even decent people lose patience with indecency. I abhor the acts of J and G and am generally articulate about the Y. I give them names, but rarely anything indecent...I don't think I normally use the M world or the K word...cuz that's frankly more approp for J😆. That said there is a limit to patience.

Anti-G posters use the world - mistress - despite whatever negative connotations are attached to the word describes her relationship with J:

A mistress is a long-term female lover and companion who is not married to her partner; the term is used especially when her partner is married.

It is hurtful, but accurate term what she is. She chose that path herself by opting to remain with J after learning their marriage was illegal.

The comparatives A-bashers use rarely have anything to do with reality or sensibilities... I have even seen one poster call her "dwarf"🤪...let's not go into the 1001 "doormat" posts just because she does not react as "progressive" women would as if there is a right reaction.

As such, if Suchi or others occasionally have more INURFACE responses to such continual bashing of A, who rarely deserves such abuse...then I understand that reaction.

______________________________
Coming to J...the English is definitely sexist, but am with you and/or anyone who comes up with a word equivalent to M for him.

_______________________________
Respectfully, it is really too much to expect people to have CIVIL reactions to UNCIVIL threads and posters that call you "sadists" and/ or respect posters who say "Any Woman Deserves Abuse" and or hyperbolically compare Bhairon to Hitler, a racist who murdered thousands. JMO
Edited by AnjanaYYZ - 13 years ago
elasingh thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 13 years ago
#36
Hitler is a word which is used frequently in day to day life in India for any person who is very strict. It carries a different meaning in this country. There is even a serial called Hitler didi on zee tv.
AnjanaYYZ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#37

Originally posted by: elasingh

Hitler is a word which is used frequently in day to day life in India for any person who is very strict. It carries a different meaning in this country. There is even a serial called Hitler didi on zee tv.


We are not on that forum...in my part of the world - they don't use that term for that serial even. They call it "General Didi".

The name HITLER is universally associated with atrocities against not just the Jewish people, but many others as well. I have visited concentration camps, seen gas chambers, the unmarked graves of thousands of the people he had killed in the name of racial supremacy, seen some of the pictures and documentation of the experimentation done under the Natzi regime.

I am sorry but, I cannot RESPECT your use of that term AT ALL nor COMPREHEND IT. I truly expect better from you in the future.

I respect everyone, but to the point they maintain that respect.
Edited by AnjanaYYZ - 13 years ago
sarandha thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#38
While i agree with all else that you say anjana, i think the same argument that applies against use of terms like hitler applies to terms like mistress also.
As i'd said earlier also,A mistress is defined as 'A woman who has a continuing sexual relationship with a usually married man who is not her husband and from whom she generally receives material support.'
Its true that it usually applies to relationship's with married men but its also true its generally understood in context of recieving material support. Historically mistress was used and continues to be used for women 'kept' by rich upper class men, aristocrats etc. It does not apply so directly to partners like jagiya and gauri where gauri is providing for him at the moment. The way we use terms historically is important here because the term mistress has come to be derogatory is more because of this aspect of being kept, partners often live together in extramarital relationships but all women in such relationships do not automatically qualify as mistresses as is understood in commonsensical terms with its historical baggage.
Edited by sarandha - 13 years ago
AnjanaYYZ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#39
@Sarandha - M term is inappropriate now for 2 reasons: 1) J is not married anymore 2) G is indeed "keeping" him not the other way around.

That said strictly speaking in the past, B was financing G and she was sharing living expenses with J, who was being financed by B indirectly through A. J was further married to G at the time, so while its not a term I would use for her... the term did fit her SELF CHOSEN situation.

Also, I don't think the use of the word M for G can be compared to Hitler for B. Its like comparing President Piera to President Obama.
mahi12 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#40
i think my post will be going out of discussion on this topic ...but just wanted to say this is most free forum on IF so far i have come across ..where people are using so many bashing abusive words a for Jagaya ..some for Gauri ..otherwise one of my experience on one forum on IF we were not even allowed to call a negative character a devil ..use words devil like for that too were given warnings because this is against IF COC ...i was kind of surprised at seeing freedom here 😆

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".