Anandi's boundaries as a sarpanch - Page 19

Originally posted by: AshBendre

tinoo...I agree one should not question anyone's parenting/upbringing. In the case when the child id an adopted one or foster one..

I agree anandi should have used her words carefully in case of madan singh and may be in front of jyiti's parents.

Originally posted by: tinoo

ho sakta hai. 😆😆 mujhe uske tareekey thode ajeeb lage... theek hai abhi mai thoda back off karti hoon.

Originally posted by: tinoo

Hi elasingh -- I dont have issues with her going into folks homes and demanding answers from them...but I just want to know what she plans to do if there is a gauri type of situation...where gauri was an unwanted beendhni and had that stamp. If bhairon had not funded her education, we dont know what might have happened to gauri.

Umm I would say that Gauri's upbringing and responsibility lies with her parents and not Bhairon and family. If you were following the serial when this section was telecast, you would know that no one forced Gauri's parents to get her married to Jagya in the first place. They came there on their own volition and agreed to get their daughter married to Jagya, knowing that he was already married, in lieu of a hefty payment.

Bhairon only funded Gauri's education as he saw a young girl eager for an eduction. He gave her a scholarship, he did not adopt her.

it is perfectly okay if anandi barges into someone's wedding... but my broader question is what plans does she have for the fallout of her actions? Is it just enough to stop it and then dust one's hands and walk off?

It is Anandi's responsibility as a Sarpanch to stop any illegal activities taking place in her village. It is also her personal commitment. This is like saying that if the police stop a man from committing a crime, they should become responsible for his family's upkeep.

Originally posted by: menusingh

sarpanch gharo m ghus kar shadia nahi rokte...anandi is different sarpanch even i also belong to rural family...4 to 5 village are together in our side...but no sarpanch move to home of people and start bashing on them

for everything there is police...anandi is qute diff sarpanch

Originally posted by: Chitrashi

Agreed, but there is something called a fictional license. Koi bhi police officer Amitabh ke jaise 25-30 gundo ko ek jhapad mein anhi ludka deta. Koi NRI itne crore nahi kama ke lata ke woh Rajnikant ke jaise 50-60 university khol sake. Na hi kisi bhi clerk mein itna dum hota hai ki woh SRK ke jaise ek Sumo wrestler se lad sake.

Originally posted by: tinoo

I dont mean illtreat her in tangible obvious ways. I am sure there will be intangible scars and words being used for jyoti like 'manhoos' which is intangible verbal abuse. There will be no trace of this. People will make fun of her too.

Originally posted by: monamie111

Tinoo..as u have raised questions on anandi's action of stopping a child marriage...i would like to ask u something...

1. do u think that if someone will stop the child marriage that person will have to take the responsibility of that child?

2. and if a person can not take the responsibility of the victim that means that person have no right to stop an evil thing?

3. this kind of evil things happen in n number of times everyday...so if a person who will save more than one child from child marriage that person have to take the responsibility of all of them?

i am really surprised that every time anandi does something good..u question her actions..😕 u did the same when she judged basant's case...there also basant and gahena was wrong and anandi was right!...and here also anandi is right! at that time also it was not a personal matter..and this time also it is not a personal matter at all..

may be i will not be able to take the responsibility of a victim..but that doesn't mean that i'll remain silent and will do nothing from saving one person's life..

Originally posted by: sarasaheja

anadi never entered in others personal life, as far as jyothis matter even though its her personal life but it is effecting society so its called not personal and anandi has all rights to do that. example if a husband beating his wief in public place like bus stand, railway station or on the road then every person has right to stop that bcoz that is a public place and that matter is not known as personal if the same thing happend in his house then some of the family members have right to stop that then thats known as personal life. here also jyothis matter is not personal and dont forget anandi is the sarpanch of that gaav. so i think anandi is 100% correct and she perposly not insult jyothis parents, i think she just shouts on them that to in a reasonable manner.