Ram disrespect priya today.. - Page 5

Originally posted by: amudhamanian

thanks shavii dear.

i shd thank u 😊

Originally posted by: shavii

i agree with u simlavidhi

Firstly , please check what you write before posting. Your ways of expression with words with poor grammar itself shows a lot. Oh! And Ram needs a life partner. Nobody in the real world would stay alone. I cant believe people have such a shallow thinking that they'd be more worried about their favorites in d show rather than the practicality.

Thanks for pointing about the grammatical errors in my post... Didn't know am giving English exam here or rather I need to be highly qualified with distinction in English to post a comment in this forum...

Originally posted by: AttractiveAdya

[

Firstly , please check what you write before posting. Your ways of expression with words with poor grammar itself shows a lot. Oh! And Ram needs a life partner. Nobody in the real world would stay alone. I cant believe people have such a shallow thinking that they'd be more worried about their favorites in d show rather than the practicality.

MS GRAMMAR POLICE:

Your "grammar policing" is interesting because of the mistakes you yourself make.
Eg.:

1. "expression with words with poor grammar". What kind of phrase is this? Your overuse of "with" and your attributing "poor grammar" to words is silly.

2. Nobody in the real world would stay alone. This looks like its a part of a hypothetical clause (because of the past modal) but obviously that is not what you mean.

3. I cant . Where is your apostrophe to indicate contraction of "not"?

4. such a shallow thinking : Mind your articles. You can't use an "a" before the noun phrase.

5. d show : really? incomprehensible!

6. the practicality. Again, your article is inappropriate. And the abstract noun doesn't make any sense at all without an appropriate prepositional adverbial.

You should edit your posts before you post them particularly if you want to pick on other people.

Originally posted by: shavii

agree she loved sid and even spend an night with mamaji thinking ram just to frame him but sad now c night of juhi and ram will be highlighted and later juhi will be shown happy with her ex husband and then she will get pregnant and extra extra and rest kasam se part 2 😡

@Bold: Huh? Ayesha slept with Mamaji? 😲

Originally posted by: Bhabhi36

Hey Bhabhi, Cool it!

Originally posted by: Bhabhi36

</font></font>

<font size="4"><font size="2">

<font size="3">MS GRAMMAR POLICE:

Your "grammar policing" is interesting because of the mistakes you yourself make.</font></font><font size="3">
Eg.:

1. "expression with words with poor grammar". What kind of phrase is this? Your overuse of "with" and your attributing "poor grammar" to words is silly.

2. Nobody in the real world would stay alone. This looks like its a part of a hypothetical clause (because of the past modal) but obviously that is not what you mean.

3. I cant . Where is your apostrophe to indicate contraction of "not"?

4. such a shallow thinking : Mind your articles. You can't use an "a" before the noun phrase.

5. d show : really? incomprehensible!

6. the practicality. Again, your article is inappropriate. And the abstract noun doesn't make any sense at all without an appropriate prepositional adverbial.

You should edit your posts before you post them particularly if you want to pick on other people.</font></font>





And you're grammar 'policy' is clearly shown above. :p
Grammar policy itself as a phrase is tarnished by the british court of Verbal and Written Phrases,Act 34554.
And I really don't give a damn about your thoughts on my grammar because I have had a lot of people who acknowledge the same Missy. And yeah, this is just a show so please grow a pair and and stop going over board?

Oh! And "d show" was basically THE show. I use my phone for net so basically I use short forms and not what you'd call wrong grammer.
And, and , and Ma'am, "The" Practicality makes complete sense. The article I've used is perfectly placed.

Originally posted by: AttractiveAdya

And you're grammar 'policy' is clearly shown above. :p
Grammar policy itself as a phrase is tarnished by the british court of Verbal and Written Phrases,Act 34554.
And I really don't give a damn about your thoughts on my grammar because I have had a lot of people who acknowledge the same Missy. And yeah, this is just a show so please grow a pair and and stop going over board?

Then honey, grow a pair yourself and stop picking on peoples' grammar. You started it, remember? Can't handle it when somebody dishes it back? Btw, what is "you're grammar policy"? Learn some basic grammar yourself, will ya? 😆

And I really don't give a damn about your thoughts on my grammar because I have had a lot of ,'who acknowledge the same Missy. And yeah, this is just a show so please grow a pair and and stop going over board?