I'm reminded of Bill Clinton's famous "depends what the meaning of is is."😆
For those who don't know, that's not a complimentary comparison.😆
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- AFG vs HK 1st Match, Group B, Abu Dhabi🏏
SUPER HEROO 9.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sep 10, 2025 EDT
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 10th Sep '25
MAIRA AGAYI 10.9
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- Ind vs UAE 2nd Match, Group A, Dubai 🏏
Sidharth Malhotra is just the same as Arjun Kapoor, just with looks!
3 Years Of Brahmāstra
How many more chances for Janhvi Kapoor!!?
Happy Birthday Akshay Kumar
Should Janhvi Kapoor Join India Forums
Karisma Kapoor's Kids Move Delhi HC
"I don't like women who are too thin" : Bipasha Basu
Anupamaa 10 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
When Love Finally Grew Up ~ A Rumya Three-Shot [Completed]
🏏Cricket Forum Banner Contest Announcement🏏📢
Navri and her eternal victimisation
I'm reminded of Bill Clinton's famous "depends what the meaning of is is."😆
For those who don't know, that's not a complimentary comparison.😆
Back to the topic.
I think Karna's popular characterization owes a lot to modern day political atmosphere. An abandoned, low-caste warrior rising beyond the narrow restrictions imposed upon him by the virtue of birth sounds fascinating and inspirational. It's a contemporary thing. That's where modern Karna's whole appeal lies.
Shakuni, on the other hand, is vilified to save Karna I think. Tv serials refuse to show Karna's active participation in Duryodhana's schemes. Someone has to fill that gap.
I agree with u.Today my teacher narrated Eklavya story with the same masala of casteism and I got irritated with it but I couldn't do anything as she is from different religion I think so can't hurt her unintentionally.Originally posted by: Wistfulness
Back to the topic.
I think Karna's popular characterization owes a lot to modern day political atmosphere. An abandoned, low-caste warrior rising beyond the narrow restrictions imposed upon him by the virtue of birth sounds fascinating and inspirational. It's a contemporary thing. That's where modern Karna's whole appeal lies.
Shakuni, on the other hand, is vilified to save Karna I think. Tv serials refuse to show Karna's active participation in Duryodhana's schemes. Someone has to fill that gap.
I don't know why I get irrelevant answer
I am asking exact meaning of formally relate to shakuni
" Shakuni formally gave gandhari to dhrithrashtra
Because formal have many meanings, official , detached, aloof , reserved, good manner, rules
So which meaning of formal will fix here
But I am getting answers that vyas did not write in this language
I am not asking in which language ved vyas write Mahabharata
And I don't know how is not make sense if want meaning of word
Exact meaning of word and exact use of language is very important particular mythology epic
Because wrong meaning and wrong word can give wrong information
Like we say Krishna ne kans ka vadh kiya . We don't say Krishna ne kans ka khoon kiya
Both khoon and vadh meaning to kill but appropriate word is vadh related to God
Even we don't say in bhagwan ki katha ki woh mar gaya , mar gayi
Mar gaya mar gayi is not appropriate word when someone dies in religious epic
Appropriate uski mrityu hui usne apna deh tyaga
Anyway I am stopping my argument here
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
It's just figure of speech for arranged marriage. As in she wasn't abducted like Subhadra or put through a contest like Panchali.
Was she given into marriage without her consent??
Officially. Ceremonially handing over Gandhari to Dhritarashtra in marriage
Although that begs the question - why do serials show Subala doing the handover?
Actually this also makes sense.
Subala was alive till Dhritrashtra Gandhaari marriage, so why would Shakuni do the fixing of the alliance?? Shouldn't it be done by the father
Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism
Actually this also makes sense.
Subala was alive till Dhritrashtra Gandhaari marriage, so why would Shakuni do the fixing of the alliance?? Shouldn't it be done by the father
The episode says Subala agreed to the marriage. Shakuni traveled with Gandhari to Hastinapuri to do the official thingamajig.
Krishna and Balram were the ones who traveled to Indraprastha after Subhadraharan. Dhrishtadyumna followed Arjuna and Panchali to potter's hut.
You were said multiple times that formalized meant being official, but you are not ready to accept it and making that it could mean something completely different.
And this is a very normal thing that if any word in the translation has multiple meanings you check the origin texts which you aren't ready to do. The words used in original text clearly means that he made the relation official, and this is on the meaning of formal, so why shouldn't we take meaning and consider the other meanings of the translated text
Still I know it's useless to try explaining you
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
The episode says Subala agreed to the marriage. Shakuni traveled with Gandhari to Hastinapuri to do the official thingamajig.
Krishna and Balram were the ones who traveled to Indraprastha after Subhadraharan. Dhrishtadyumna followed Arjuna and Panchali to potter's hut.
Oh thankyou makes sense
Please read my post propely
I no where accept meaning of formal as official
I have said that formal word has many meaning like official. Aloof, reserve , rules so I want which exact meaning of formal applies in terms of shakuni
Even I check in sankrit t to bhi mujhe uska meaning dekhna hi hoga and each word ke different synonym hotel hain
And even I have not ask u to explain to me