Do you think Rupali knows?? - Page 4

Originally posted by: SoulSpiller

And yes, that she publicly said something like "I'm happy that people recognize me as Anupama and that I'm part of such a socially progressive show" does raise my eyebrows.

I remember this and especially at a time when they were butchering the most serious of issues. Delusions of grandeur....

Handling fame and popularity is quite an art.

I’m almost certain she follows this forum or has people appointed to do so on her behalf.

I think she is an ok actress but has taken her role of Anupama way too seriously and imbibed her mannerisms in real life… and worse is when she promotes the show as ‘progressive’ when its at its regressive low.

I get that she is briefed by the makers for projecting a positive PR front but its sad that such utter nonsense is sold to audiences in the name of likeability and delivering a social message to the masses.

I havent watched the show from the beginning but from what I’ve heard and read, Anupama’s popularity was shaken a bit since Anuj came into the picture…the makers were not prepared for such a response and I think majority of the audiences failed to connect with her and were confused about their response to the love angle introduced in her life.

The premise of the show shifted from ‘the struggle story’ to a wannabe ‘love story’ and the makers had too many people to please…the story went for a toss in order to give them all shared screen time and here we are in a hotchpotch of characters.

I’d rather not comment more on the actress cause I’m pretty sure my statements will be misconstrued, it’s anyways quite an essay I’ve written already!

The real question is whether the creatives read our comments ???

Do we have a member here from the team who constantly reads our thoughts ? 😆

Originally posted by: Harish111

Am sure she will be able to wipe her tears with the millions she earns and awards she gets from the show

The joke's on us literally. She is sitting on the top laughing at us in millions...

Originally posted by: SoulSpiller

Yes...there might be a lot of politics involved we know absolutely nothing about.

So many unknown variables here.

But I do understand where this question is coming from! While she was always ott, there were episodes in the beginning where she had an air of dignity about her; but now even the word 'ott' wouldn't want to be associated with her!

There is no way a human being goes through such exaggerated movements and dialogues with zero awareness of how it comes across as, right? I just can't comprehend that either. It looks so fake it's painful to watch.

And yes, that she publicly said something like "I'm happy that people recognize me as Anupama and that I'm part of such a socially progressive show" does raise my eyebrows.

But, ah, maybe she, as an actress and human being, just has much bigger priorities than how her character appears to the people here.

An actor's job is to act. Whenever they are behind the cameras, they just act. Though I find her acting better in TV interviews rather than the show. Khair show to anyway I do not watch.

Originally posted by: strancho

An actor's job is to act. Whenever they are behind the cameras, they just act. Though I find her acting better in TV interviews rather than the show. Khair show to anyway I do not watch.

Originally posted by: strancho

An actor's job is to act. Whenever they are behind the cameras, they just act. Though I find her acting better in TV interviews rather than the show. Khair show to anyway I do not watch.

Since the question was about whether Rupali knows, I had some tendencies to think from her side. Do I think her acting is terrible now? Oh, definitely, definitely, yes! I think her acting is so terrible now it feels unlikely she doesn't know it. So in my mind the next question was, if so, why is this happening? Because she didn't used to be this bad before.

Not a justification, more like trying to understand. But I can understand it can come across like that.

If the question involved: Should an actor act? I would have been like: Of course she should, why is this question posted on the forum again?

Originally posted by: hinz

are you saying she acts in interviews? Pompy marwaegi tu

To be fair, probably a lot of people do!

Originally posted by: SoulSpiller

Since the question was about whether Rupali knows, I had some tendencies to think from her side. Do I think her acting is terrible now? Oh, definitely, definitely, yes! I think her acting is so terrible now it feels unlikely she doesn't know it. So in my mind the next question was, if so, why is this happening? Because she didn't used to be this bad before.

IMO,creativity is endless. The pursuit for perfection and doing better than before is one of the innate traits of humans. As long one believes that there is room for improvement there is always creativity, to improvize, to do better than before.

The drive to be perfect dies the minute one assumes there is nothing to improve upon or they have surpassed perfection. This misconception that they are an epitome of perfection, coupled with other factors such as peer pressure, competition,monetary compensation etc just adds to the problem, forcing the talent curve to take a u-turn.

In the performing arts industry, there are countless such examples. It is rare to find talent that is exhibited consistently over years, leave alone decades. That is why perhaps, the likes of Lata Mangeshkar et al are called legends are only a handful in a country of billions.

ps: I am/was not a fan of RG, have not seen her prior works either. This is my general observation on arts, human talent( innate vs learned).

Originally posted by: SmithaRam

True, she wasn't this bad before. I have wondered about it too. Based on other examples/analysis,this is my theory, take it with loads of salt.😊

IMO,creativity is endless. The pursuit for perfection and doing better than before is one of the innate traits of humans. As long one believes that there is room for improvement there is always creativity, to improvize, to do better than before.

The drive to be perfect dies the minute one assumes there is nothing to improve upon or they have surpassed perfection. This misconception that they are an epitome of perfection, coupled with other factors such as peer pressure, competition,monetary compensation etc just adds to the problem, forcing the talent curve to take a u-turn.

In the performing arts industry, there are countless such examples. It is rare to find talent that is exhibited consistently over years, leave alone decades. That is why perhaps, the likes of Lata Mangeshkar et al are called legends are only a handful in a country of billions.

ps: I am/was not a fan of RG, have not seen her prior works either. This is my general observation on arts, human talent( innate vs learned).

What is your theory on how much of a role script has to play? Because I can't help but think: how much can you even do with dialogues like "Swagwali Anupama is back!"

Or

"Dolly, Molly, Holly, I've dressed you all up for my doll! Now let's have some breakfast together!" (or whatever the hell that was)