Originally posted by: Harish111
Completely disagree. Getting stuck in a regressive serial is bad for everyone involved. It stifles growth, stifles creativity and stifles money earning potential. Getting stuck for decades in one contract gives all power to studios, channels and executives and no power to employees
Please look at the western model. Not only do the actors get paid millions, they have all the power to leave and stop the show. Even incredibly successful shows like The Big Bang Theory, Seinfeld, etc etc all ended in a decade (or just over) because actors walked away because they felt show had no more potential or growth left for them. This despite some studios even offering them over 50 million per year
If you are actually worried about livelihood of actors and staff you will NEVER want a serial to be dragged and continue for long. Look at Bob Odenkirk from Breaking Bad. He is now starring in action movie roles like "Nobody" and has lead role in Better Call Saul at his age of nearly 60! If Breaking Bad had just got extended indefinitely, he would still play a small supporting role instead of starring in his own show and movies. Dont you want Rupali or guarav to be able to explore their entire potential instead of being stuck in nonsense roles and plots for decades?
What if Sarabhai had dragged for decades, would we have RG in Anupama?
What you are saying goes against common sense and how the industry works. Let's take IPL as an example. Why do players keep earning more and more each year? Because they have the flexibility to leave the team and join another team or go back to auction. So if players want more money teams have to either release the players (eg Pandya, Iyer) or give them huge money to be retained ( eg Pant, Jadeja, Kohli, Dhoni). Now imagine if players were stuck with one team with no option to switch. Today ITV actors and staff are bound by unreasonable contracts and have no say in the storyline. Their only escape is low TRP and show ending and i can guarantee many actors are praying for that (I mean look at how muh potential the Baa actress had initially and the kind of lines and screentime she is getting today, completely ruining her potential)
Its actually BENEFICIAL for all actors and staff if a show ends, particularly at its peak. They get more money through new contracts than they get in contract renewal for same show. They have the hype of a successful show so other channels rush to sign them. They have the flexibility to choose only the scripts they want, today if they make RG dance ever episode, RG has no say. Its also grrat for their creativity, playing same character for decades makes any actor stale. Dragging shows only help the greedy executives and give them all the power to treat actors and staff as slaves forever.
THIS^^ 👏