Heres what i think Abhi should do next... - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

47

Views

4.2k

Users

10

Likes

36

Frequent Posters

belledejour thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: N.i.s.a

remember the tent pegged in the graden for three days?

I didnt get this.......

Abhi had a telephone conversation with Anita while she was at the Sethis and he was surveying the land where he ran into Simi. He reminded his sister of the time when he demanded to be sent away to boarding school by pitching a tent in the garden. He had to spend three nights there before papa Tarneja caved in. This was when he was in the 7th standard. Hope this helps!
461075 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#32

Okay folks hold your horses! Really, I'm not suggesting that he actually fantasises over his mum... it's an unconscious thing ... more of "id" than "ego" ...

Both Jung and Freud are anachronisms and the vast preponderance of their theories debunked (although in my recent reading of stuff on the brain some of Freud was being reconsidered albeit in a very minor way) . . . 'psychology' (what kind one need ask these days) is now heavily dependent on nueroscience for an understanding of what happens on the conscious and unconscious level (there is a whole lot of on-going research on the 'neural correlates of consciousness' and related issues - Crick of DNA fame has been a leading figure of that pursuit) . . . ego and id are nonsensical concepts . . sorry . . . I don't mean to sound harsh . . .
That said . . .
I think I can safely say that there's a possibility our Abhi didn't get much daddy-love at an earlier age?
This premise is no longer entertained as a possibility . . .
"9th standard mein mujhey 12 standard ki larkion se pyar ho jata tha!, suggesting a repeated pattern! We don't know what any of those girls looked like! (are air hostesses hot-as- hell always?)
I remember this well - during their one-and-only (so far) all night conversations . . . and he's already confessed to not being enamored by 'looks' so whatever they looked like is immaterial . . besides there is that adage about 'eye of the beholder' . . .
And here he is again falling for a much older (unattractive, lets not debate that here) woman
Ah belle . . . subjectivity to the fore eh? 😊 'Much older'?! Considering that these kinds of things are cultural artifacts of the worst kind . . . no basis in biology vis-a-vis age and attraction . . . none . . . zip . . . zilch . . . zero . . . some cultures prefer that women be older . . . while I won't resurrect the debate on Simi's 'looks' I believe that what I expostulated in another thread about this has merit . . .
she is not a striking, sexy, worldly, more experienced older woman, which is usually the case why men fall for members of the opposite sex older than themselves!
I'm sure this is propagated to titillate . . . again, based on my understanding of biology, there is no correlation between age and attraction . . . besides what you suggest can only be verified by a large scale survey and assessment - across all human cultures . . . I doubt that such a project has been undertaken . . .
It has also been suggested that men are sexually attracted to members of the opposite sex that have the physical attributes their mothers (or mother-figures) possessed when they were developing their sexual-psyche (again around the 3-5 yr mark)
Irrevocably unsubstantiated & (I believe) falsified (I'll provide a bibliography if needed) . . . please jettison Freud out the nearest window . . . brains remain disconnected and unmyelinated until one is in their 20's hence not fully functional . . . 'sexual-psyches' are a figment of someone's imagination . . . any understanding of human sexuality remains rudimentary . . .
So, while 'older women' may be a leitmotif in Abhi's life . . . it's a perfectly acceptable state of affairs, completely consistent with what we know of human (and other animal) behavior . . .
I say: Go for it Abhi!
bewajah thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#33
So, while 'older women' may be a leitmotif in Abhi's life . . . it's a perfectly acceptable state of affairs, completely consistent with what we know of human (and other animal) behavior . . .
I say: Go for it Abhi!


Thank you for the above Dipa, cudnt agree with u more.

we are analyzing the reasons that abhi fell for simi, would we be doing the same if the roles were reversed?? what if mili gets involved with a guy around dads age( considerably more age diff than abhi-simi i know but then again 8yrs isnt considered much in india if its the guy who is older). personally i wud b creeped out by it but wud we still be analyzing it??


461075 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#34
we are analyzing the reasons that abhi fell for simi, would we be doing the same if the roles were reversed??
Absolutely not! Now there's double standards for you . . . I was reflecting on another analogous situation . . . that of 'sacrifice' . . . we're hoping fervently . . . keeping all our appendages crossed that Simi not stand aside and push Neetu into Abhi's arms or somesuch . . . not right etc etc etc . . . and then label Abhi infantile when he does not wish to sacrifice his happiness . . . his tenacity becomes a vice . . . hunh?
And speaking of Mili . . . why the sudden amnesia about Simi and her young love that she was so gaga about? She's standing there championing the Dagars?!!! Wha?!!!
Edited by SValeCalGal - 15 years ago
bewajah thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#35
i wudnt really call it amnesia unless of course she verbalizes her support for naa-kool

she loves her elder sister, has watched her being rejected numerous times and sees the melodrama that follows each round of rejection. then along come these ppl who find simi delightful.......... c'mon give the girl a break

i saw some posts abt simi smiling too n again mebbe she was just being polite. what wud u have her do?? run from there shouting nahiiiiiiiin ??


belledejour thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#36

Originally posted by: SValeCalGal

Both Jung and Freud are anachronisms'

O K!' and while we're at it lets throw Shakespeare and Marx ino the mix!

the vast preponderance of their theories debunked

wrong again' they're a pervasive and rampant part of our daily lives (especially in the western world) eg. the Freudean slip and the tip of the iceberg. Don't get me wrong, I am no Freudean (refer to my disclaimers in the initial post) yet Im not too chuffed to see the dismissal of a major influence in the field with such disdain, in true American fashion, might I add! 😉

'psychology' (what kind one need ask these days)

The human kind ofcourse' yes there are types, we could say developmental in our case, but why should we need to' surely the whole is greater than the sum of is parts!

is now heavily dependent on nueroscience for an understanding of what happens on the conscious and unconscious level

did u say concious and unconcious' I thought you were saying saying Freud (and Jung) were obsolete!

(there is a whole lot of on-going research on the 'neural correlates of consciousness' and related issues

on-going being the operative word here'and thus inconclusive!

ego and id are nonsensical concepts

Absolutely not!

I don't mean to sound harsh . .

No worries' im not of the kind to take neutral events as harsh reflections on my personal worth! 😃

I think I can safely say that there's a possibility our Abhi didn't get much daddy-love at an earlier age? This premise is no longer entertained as a possibility . . .

Really? And why is that? they fell out at age 12 (that is abt grade 7 time right?) and up until then they were chums?

'Much older'?! Considering that these kinds of things are cultural artifacts of the worst kind . . .

Yes, cultural artifacts ' but we're not talking generality are we Gal? we have at hand a very specific example set firmly within well-known cultural restraints and norms'

some cultures prefer that women be older . . .
again we have a specific instance at hand so why stray!

while I won't resurrect the debate on Simi's 'looks' I believe that what I expostulated in another thread about this has merit . . .

Im grateful for that ' you're allowed your bit of subjecivity! 😊

May I just add that, an hour glass figure in the female form is considered attractive to males across all cultures 'theres plenty of conclusive research to support that!

I'm sure this is propagated to titillate . . .

Males of our species (and vastly around the animal kingdom) are visually oriented' that is a fact! Signals that go to the brain to produce the endorphins invaraibly come from the eyes and the nose'

hopefully our Simi does not smell of manjuji's tael(oil) anymore! 😊

no basis in biology vis-a-vis age and attraction . . . none . . . zip . . . zilch . . . zero . . .

again, based on my understanding of biology, there is no correlation between age and attraction . . .

Ahh' biology is superlative!!' something tangible and easily investigated! '

across the animal kingdom the search for a mate is simplistic ' the males battle it out for the most fertile(attractive) female, lead by the supreme instinct of procreation! youth especially in females is a sign of fertility and the ability to reproduce'

The female chooses the best father for his genes and ability to safeguard her offspring'(oops is this heading Nakul's way!)

brains remain disconnected and unmyelinated until one is in their 20's hence not fully functional

huh??? Not fully functional? so anyone under the age of twenty-something (what about our Abhi then? He knows what he's doing at 22 ... right??) doesn' know what love is?

And I was convinced I was in true love at age 17!! Now yo tell me! Darn!

So, while 'older women' may be a leitmotif in Abhi's life . . . it's a perfectly acceptable state of affairs,
for once we agree this morning! ... man i need that cuppa now!
completely consistent with what we know of human (and other animal) behavior . . .
hmmm...maybe i spoke too soon! 😃

Edited by belledejour - 15 years ago
belledejour thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#37

Originally posted by: bewajah


we are analyzing the reasons that abhi fell for simi, would we be doing the same if the roles were reversed?? what if mili gets involved with a guy around dads age( considerably more age diff than abhi-simi i know but then again 8yrs isnt considered much in india if its the guy who is older). personally i wud b creeped out by it but wud we still be analyzing it??


you bet we would!! ... and while we're at it... why don't we analyse how Mr Sethi has managed to raise a spineless fool like Anuj... where did the genes go Gal? what happened to the DNA! something to do with upbringing perhaps and and not just biology!
Laila2009 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago
#38
I think you were just trying to see he's into older women right and not necessarily is mother or someone like his mother? 😉
yup thas what i said in the initial post...
in the one above, i was trying to explicate why i think he's into older women... 😊
And the reason is?? We are reading a lot of Freudian explanation that he might have had some experience between the age of 3-5 when he was drawn towards his mother and that perhaps Simi represents that image? And all this happened in his unconsciousness??😕
Unfortunately according to a recent study by American Psychological Association (this is one of the primary driving forces between psychology in the US today), Freud's theories are regarded as a "desiccated and dead" historcial artifact as they cannot be scientifically tested and thus no longer hold much weight.😲
Perhaps we may need to look for another explanation as to why Abhi loves Simi? 😔 Or may be we should leave that responsiblity and work to the creative team who unforuntately failed to do anything to make it believable (at least for me)?😉
My apologises if I said or wrote anything offense😳
bewajah thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#39

Originally posted by: belledejour

you bet we would!! ... and while we're at it... why don't we analyse how Mr Sethi has managed to raise a spineless fool like Anuj... where did the genes go Gal? what happened to the DNA! something to do with upbringing perhaps and and not just biology!




look what u did belle, u actually made me think and read and that too abt stuff that had nothing to do with dora and diego or hannah montana ............ thanks 😊
the closest i had come to reading abt freud had been a book i read a couple of yrs bak "the interpretation of murder"
in the case of anuj, dna vs upbringing is an interesting argument but considering that he shares both with his sibs, then i guess that his personality was determined by his reaction to both nature and nurture.



belledejour thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#40

Unfortunately

For who? Don't go worrying about me now babe! ... I aint breaking down over this!😊

according to a recent study by American Psychological Association (this is one of the primary driving forces between psychology in the US today), Freud's theories are regarded as a "desiccated and dead" historcial artifact as they cannot be scientifically tested and thus no longer hold much weight.

Yes I've heard of the APA, and that's what the American reference in my response to SValeCalGal was! Historically anti-Freud sentiment has always been more rampant in the USA than Europe, a cultural thing perhaps... He is still popular today in Italy, Spain even Latin America and Australia. Yes it is possible that that an American Authority is not the final word on something! (*horror)

While I am not about to (or do not in any way claim that I can!) take on the APA single handedly... (aren't you glad to know I'm not delusional! 😊 ) I can offer pro-Freud writings (and no that does not mean I can prove his theories scientifically) perhaps to address the "desiccated and dead claims" but nothing a google search can't offer to those truly interested...

I take the following liberty, because the turn of phrase has already been used here... In the words of Peter Kramer, of "Listening to Prozac" "Even Freudian analysts don't hold themselves 100% to Freud. Psychotherapy is like one of those branching trees, where each of the branches legitimately claims a common ancestry, namely Freud, but none of the branches are sitting at the root. We'd be very mistaken to jettison psychotherapy or Freud."

Let me repeat myself ..I am not a Freudian ... I do no subscribe to his theories in whole... his work is not the holy grail... I'm well aware of the fact that his harshest critics often start out as his followers and what makes me most uncomfortable is that his theories don't leave any room for the problem of child abuse!... Having said that I think he was a great thinker, a man ahead of his time, whose influence has been far-reaching and is often discussed (an essential part of Psychology 101, like you say in the US)... if only to be declared dead!

Phew! Right! So what now yo ask? 😊

I apologise for boring you guys...Like I've said before I offered the term loosely (dare I say, playfully) and requested the dagge(a)rs (get it?) not be unsheathed! Alas, in vain!!!

Will it make you happy if I retracted the diagnosis? 😊
Perhaps we may need to look for another explanation as to why Abhi loves Simi? Or may be we should leave that responsiblity and work to the creative team who unforuntately failed to do anything to make it believable (at least for me)?

If only they were up to the challenge..😒 it's a dirty job but someone's go to do it! 😆

My apologises if I said or wrote anything offense

No need to apologise atall laila, no offense taken! 😊 unless ofcourse that was the intenion in which case I shall have to oblige! 😆

Edited by belledejour - 15 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".