27 Aug, 2023 - Synopsis Hub - Page 24

Originally posted by: LadooCandy

In simple word 'NO' . But such meetings could be done at a later time especially in the scenario of a spouse death/illness . The whole point why I drew a parallel of a man seeking company amidst woman after the recent death of his wife , was to showcase that's it's not the case of ill treatment exclusively toward widows but rather the genuine stance of the family of the deceased .

Edit: Italics : In this case their is intersection that both times it was claimed ' soul love ' from which she moved on .

I think this is a special scenario because of Abhir. I do think that a man's actions would not be criticized that much. But in either case the point isn't that they are seeking the company of anyone, but that they are going through a tough time and need a friend and confidante.

Even without Abhir in the picture, I think Abhi helping Ak would be valid and should not be looked at like that by anyone. She is obviously in grief and if a friend can help her come out of it, it should not matter if that friend is her ex or anyone from the opposite sex.

In this case though, Abhi has made it clear he is there for Abhir and he is mostly focusing on Abhir. Muskaan also has an issue with Abhir developing a bond with Abhi or spending time with him. So it's not specific to Ak.

Like Abhi in the beginning of the leap was accused of treating Ak as his possession, Muskaan is now acting like Ak and Abhir are Nav's possessions.

Originally posted by: OnyxOutlaw

They can start a publishing company and forget the diamond business since their whole life is perfect material for fiction. Genres will be poor jokes,family drama,rom coms with love triangles,poems which will make them soar to heights of success.

Publishing company can be done for sure 🤣

Originally posted by: lagjagale

I think this is a special scenario because of Abhir. I do think that a man's actions would not be criticized that much. But in either case the point isn't that they are seeking the company of anyone, but that they are going through a tough time and need a friend and confidante.

Even without Abhir in the picture, I think Abhi helping Ak would be valid and should not be looked at like that by anyone. She is obviously in grief and if a friend can help her come out of it, it should not matter if that friend is her ex or anyone from the opposite sex.

In this case though, Abhi has made it clear he is there for Abhir and he is mostly focusing on Abhir. Muskaan also has an issue with Abhir developing a bond with Abhi or spending time with him. So it's not specific to Ak.

Like Abhi in the beginning of the leap was accused of treating Ak as his possession, Muskaan is now acting like Ak and Abhir are Nav's possessions.

This is the main issue IMO.....Abhimanyu spending any time with or bonding with Abhir is making Muskaan insecure.....they have always wanted to deny the basic reality of Abhimanyu being Abhir's father cuz they have spent 6 years propping up Nav as the singular father.

The current mess is all thanks to Ak and her Kasauli gang only that they spent so long pretending like Abhi doesn't have a deep connection with Abhir and the rest of the Goenkas regardless of Nav's existence 😆

And yes, Abhi would even have tried to help as a friend and well-wisher even if he wasn't Abhir's father.....he would have been slandered by cheap thinking people then also even though his intentions have always been noble towards Ak and the Goenkas. Ab logon ko Abhimanyu ki existence se hi insecurity ho jaati hai toh how is it his problem? 😆

He isn't imposing himself on anyone....Ak is welcoming his help cuz she feels guilty for falsely accusing him of Nav's death and has suddenly woken up to Abhimanyu's pain as a father who wants to be there for his depressed child as well....lol so in all this, there is nothing to twist unless you want to deliberately apply orthodox thinking that a woman can't hang out with a man who's her ex even if they are only talking platonically to discuss general issues. To understand such interactions, one needs to look at things from a human lens rather than trying to always define a man-woman equation in romantic terms.

Just cuz Abhimanyu has been honest that he will always love Ak doesn't mean he can't approach her platonically for the sake of humanity. Sabke bas ki baat nahin hoti to maintain their honesty as well as decency simultaneously.....Abhimanyu is able to do that so people are viewing that suspiciously too....lol

Originally posted by: OnyxOutlaw

Maybe the Goenkas will publish this book as the ‘ultimate book of pjs’ making it a best seller 😆

Oouuiijaaa PJ's by Abhinav Sharma 🤭🤭

Originally posted by: AreYaar

Muskaan was part of the whole Kasauli gang low budget addition by the makers for this leap - the cliched annoying bubbly girl.......lol they never gave much development to her and Kairav other than her hanging around giving him random gyaans to be calm😆

And now irony is that she is the one with anger issues 🤣.....the way the writers of this show vilify the men over having anger issues and then whitewash the women who go around screaming and doing tod phod in anger.....amazing to watch😆

Originally posted by: AreYaar

This is the main issue IMO.....Abhimanyu spending any time with or bonding with Abhir is making Muskaan insecure.....they have always wanted to deny the basic reality of Abhimanyu being Abhir's father cuz they have spent 6 years propping up Nav as the singular father.

The current mess is all thanks to Ak and her Kasauli gang only that they spent so long pretending like Abhi doesn't have a deep connection with Abhir and the rest of the Goenkas regardless of Nav's existence 😆

And yes, Abhi would even have tried to help as a friend and well-wisher even if he wasn't Abhir's father.....he would have been slandered by cheap thinking people then also even though his intentions have always been noble towards Ak and the Goenkas. Ab logon ko Abhimanyu ki existence se hi insecurity ho jaati hai toh how is it his problem? 😆

He isn't imposing himself on anyone....Ak is welcoming his help cuz she feels guilty for falsely accusing him of Nav's death and has suddenly woken up to Abhimanyu's pain as a father who wants to be there for his depressed child as well....lol so in all this, there is nothing to twist unless you want to deliberately apply orthodox thinking that a woman can't hang out with a man who's her ex even if they are only talking platonically to discuss general issues. To understand such interactions, one needs to look at things from a human lens rather than trying to always define a man-woman equation in romantic terms.

Just cuz Abhimanyu has been honest that he will always love Ak doesn't mean he can't approach her platonically for the sake of humanity. Sabke bas ki baat nahin hoti to maintain their honesty as well as decency simultaneously.....Abhimanyu is able to do that so people are viewing that suspiciously too....lol

Muskaan sounded ridiculous when she said only Bhaijee had the right,haq to be Abhir’s father. She was crossing all boundaries and somebody should give her the right advice.

Akshara realised that she wasn’t doing the right thing by keeping Abhimanyu away from his parenthood or by blaming him often. She wants to mend the relationship and work together co-parenting Abhir in these difficult times. Also Abhimanyu as a friend, totally understands her and is like a calm in her storm. She feels comfortable and safe around him. This doesn’t seem problematic at all unless, we bring the typical notion that a widow can’t get the support of her male platonic friend who is also the father of her child, ex partner and her friend who knows her so well.

Originally posted by: OnyxOutlaw

Muskaan sounded ridiculous when she said only Bhaijee had the right,haq to be Abhir’s father. She was crossing all boundaries and somebody should give her the right advice.

Akshara realised that she wasn’t doing the right thing by keeping Abhimanyu away from his parenthood or by blaming him often. She wants to mend the relationship and work together co-parenting Abhir in these difficult times. Also Abhimanyu as a friend, totally understands her and is like a calm in her storm. She feels comfortable and safe around him. This doesn’t seem problematic at all unless, we bring the typical notion that a widow can’t get the support of her male platonic friend who is also the father of her child, ex partner and her friend who knows her so well.

LOL see it's a very complicated situation ....Goenkas have spent so long propping up Nav as Abhir's father that they can't DEFINITIVELY call Abhimanyu Abhir's father.....khud ki chop ho jaayegi na😆

So they are trying to navigate it delicately by not outrightly saying that Abhi has FULL RIGHT on Abhir as his father and bas indirectly bolne ka try kar rahe hain that Abhi has the right to come visit Abhir cuz he is also A father of Abhir😆

And isi in between ka faayda uthaa ke Muskaan is talking bakwaas about how only Bhaiji is Abhir's father blah blah.....until Akshara or someone else shuts her up ki Abhimanyu is Abhir's father, woh aise hi bolti rahegi.

Ak has held on to a lot of grudges against Abhimanyu out of forced hate and her immaturity as a person....but the moment she puts those aside, she has a natural camaraderie with Abhimanyu where she understands when he's trying to help her with something and she accepts it in good faith.

At some point, Ak herself will have to speak up that Abhimanyu is helping her as a good samaritan and trying to do his duty as Abhir's father...but I guess she doesn't have the guts to say this cuz she feels if she defends him directly, people will presume inka kuch chal raha hai phir se😆.....like the elephant in the room is that everyone knows Abhimanyu still loves only her - she also knows this😆....that is why they all behave like Ak can't be nice to him or it means she wants to go back to him cuz he toh will be waiting his whole life for her only😆

Originally posted by: LadooCandy

In simple word 'NO' . But such meetings could be done at a later time especially in the scenario of a spouse death/illness . The whole point why I drew a parallel of a man seeking company amidst woman after the recent death of his wife , was to showcase that's it's not the case of ill treatment exclusively toward widows but rather the genuine stance of the family of the deceased .

Edit: Italics : In this case their is intersection that both times it was claimed ' soul love ' from which she moved on .

I really don't think Ak is capable of soul love. Almost she is a reflector and in both cases she reflected back whatever love she received. She doesn't really understand love itself cause from childhood she hasn't felt any unconditional love. Abhi got lucky with his mom and brother and their little family unit. He models his love after his mother's love which is full of devotion. And if Harsh wasn't such a horrible person. Manjari might have actually continued to be devoted to him regardless of how he treated her - just like Abhi is with Ak.

Originally posted by: lagjagale

I really don't think Ak is capable of soul love. Almost she is a reflector and in both cases she reflected back whatever love she received. She doesn't really understand love itself cause from childhood she hasn't felt any unconditional love. Abhi got lucky with his mom and brother and their little family unit. He models his love after his mother's love which is full of devotion. And if Harsh wasn't such a horrible person. Manjari might have actually continued to be devoted to him regardless of how he treated her - just like Abhi is with Ak.

Also, I don't think Ak ever claimed to feel soul love for Nav😆....she has described her love for Nav always in terms of being grateful for all that he's done for her, his support etc.

It is Ak herself who has demeaned the soul love she shared with Abhimanyu....lol toh phir why will she claim the same for Nav?😆

Bottom line is that Ak doesn't even understand love...woh kuch bhi bolti rehti hai😆....bolne do😆. As you said, she is mainly someone who accepts whatever love is put in front of her....it is the person giving the love that usually has a clearer picture of what their love is about than Akshara who is always the receiver.

Originally posted by: AreYaar

LOL see it's a very complicated situation ....Goenkas have spent so long propping up Nav as Abhir's father that they can't DEFINITIVELY call Abhimanyu Abhir's father.....khud ki chop ho jaayegi na😆

So they are trying to navigate it delicately by not outrightly saying that Abhi has FULL RIGHT on Abhir as his father and bas indirectly bolne ka try kar rahe hain that Abhi has the right to come visit Abhir cuz he is also A father of Abhir😆

And isi in between ka faayda uthaa ke Muskaan is talking bakwaas about how only Bhaiji is Abhir's father blah blah.....until Akshara or someone else shuts her up ki Abhimanyu is Abhir's father, woh aise hi bolti rahegi.

Ak has held on to a lot of grudges against Abhimanyu out of forced hate and her immaturity as a person....but the moment she puts those aside, she has a natural camaraderie with Abhimanyu where she understands when he's trying to help her with something and she accepts it in good faith.

At some point, Ak herself will have to speak up that Abhimanyu is helping her as a good samaritan and trying to do his duty as Abhir's father...but I guess she doesn't have the guts to day this cuz she feels if she defends him directly, people will presume inka kuch chal raha hai phir se😆.....like the elephant in the room is that everyone knows Abhimanyu still loves only her - she also knows this😆....that is why they all behave like Ak can't be nice to him or it means she wants to go back to him cuz he toh will be waiting his whole life for her only😆

Lol, Kya din hoga woh when Ak fights for Abhi's rights as a father. But that is where this is leading so I am happy.

But you are right, it's complicated cause Goenkas are maha flippers and Muskaan has no idea about this. Since she has been on the scene at least, Abhi is the villain for everyone. So she is also used to seeing him that way. Now suddenly they all flipped and she is still stuck in Abhi being villain mode. It can be confusing for anyone.

In any case, it will be either BP or Ak or both defending Abhi now and defending Ak's character.