Originally posted by: DevilsHeart
You got me wrong. I was only talking about the financial burden issue. There’s nothing wrong in second marriage or a kid getting love from both fathers. And as a devotee of Kanhaji she could have understood this better!
When parents are unable to move on from past - how can they expect the child to do it? She had a horrible past no doubt but there was good in it too and even after leap she has acknowledged and thanked Abhimanyu for his help multiple times but she forgets all this when she is speaking of Abhimanyu’s presence in Abhir’s life.
I just read a quote somewhere which is apt for most adults in show esp Akshara and Manjiri - “You should heal yourself before you become a parent so that your child doesn’t have to heal from having you as a parent!”
Its high time everyone got a closure on white day before it drains all colors out of the children’s lives!
You brought up the bullying as for which Akshara couldn't have prevented Abhir from getting bullied for, to quote the bully, having two fathers— short of not marrying Abhinav.
What she could have done, had she known the situation in Birla House, is give him assurance that changing or not changing his name doesn't change his being or the love his parents have for him. Also, to quote Shakespeare, what's in a name? Why is everyone so triggered by the Sharma surname? Apart from the fact that it's Abhir's birthname and he was raised as Abhinav's son, what does it denote? Changing it to Birla wouldn't change Abhir's upbringing or his love for Abhinav. Alternatively, it won't change the fact that Abhimanyu is his biological father either.
Rather the best dada here says meri geriatric maa ek bacche ke apne parents ke pyaar se insecure kaise nahi hoti when you keep saying Birla nahi Sharma hai??????????
An identity crisis was forced upon six y/o child because a geriatric adult is insecure of a little child's love for his parents.
"Usse jaana hoga ki uske asli pita ka naam Abhinav Sharma nahi *rip a kid's school notebooks* Abhimanyu Birla hai * desecrates notebooks of a six y/o*
*RooAaRrr* But please meri sabse nazuk maa ki parwah na karke tum apne chhote se bacche se kyon milne aayi. *RooooAr*
Abhimanyu absolutely knew till the end that Abhir did not want to live with his biological father and still went ahead with the custody case to gratify himself— to the point that he gloated today about getting Abhir because of his mother. If he couldn't priortise and still cannot priortise Abhir over himself and his mother, why is Akshara being crucified for taking a misstep which, in her mind, would have made it easier for Abhir to accept a new familial set-up?
Anyhow.
Edited by Deltablues - 2 years ago
76