Originally posted by: chaipaani
I am sorry couldn't help it even though I don't consider it DV but still chalo as a audience maan liya that's what it is.
How are you/AK going to prove it in court?
It was in close doors before that day Abhimanyu was a loving supporting husband caring towards his pregnant wife. Witnesses - Whole Birla Hospital, Goenka Family and servants of both house.
Then WD happened a traumatic day for all and during all the grievance Abhira divorce happened and AK left.
As per BP who didn't met her claimed to her newly ex husband that she is fine, doesn't want to come back and happy so he didn't pursued her. Then they got a call that she married someone.
Now 6 + years later they got to know that the boy she was claiming is hers and her current husband is actually his. Hence the whole case and all.
Now how is actually AK going to prove that hey actually yaad aaya DV bache ka truth isliye nahi btaya and all.
But so far Custody case jo bhi utha obviously yeh sab points uthe hain k divorce hua, call kra nahi uthaya isliye BC forge krdiya and all. And we heard the verdict.
Now two points why this constant need to claim k DV DV DV when the person in picture is not saying the same, can't prove it on court.
Second for show too ek toh next day hi you can't go to higher court it's a custody case not a murder case but again chalo what will change the financial conditions the fact that judge ordered an inquiry against Mrs Sharma for forging BC & other legal documents of Abhir.
The fact is my friend that its a moot point which you seem to be stuck as a cassette now.
28