Originally posted by: India_TV
You r contradicting ur self...Neil is responsible for his life....she was not...neil is responsible for his actions she is not....She did not force him to do it.....
She had done what she could.....when situations are such, the decisions r taken at the spur of the moment...and she had done that...and so has neil....
I dont find that wrong at all.....
If she would have gone for the concert and something would have happened there, still v could consider...But here she was not wrong......
and the way abhi treated her...was worse than what harsh has been doing....he blamed for for so many murders....when she has lost her baby tooo.....
he paid no attention to her medical checkup,,,.and hit her at her weakest point of seerat Ma's death along...he had no concers for her even after months.....
Another major difference is harsh was in a forced marriage with mnajari....and Abhi treated akshu the way he did ....at her lowest....when he claimed to have loved her.....
I dont support harsh's behaviour...But I dont consider Abhi's better than Harsh's...he was worse...
i am not contradicting anything because from the start i never said ak manipulated him or she forced him my point was always why she didnt stopped him as a sister. no matter whatever the situation you cannot let your loved one in danger .
neil went inorder to stop ak from going besides saving those girls so if ak had tried to stop him .he would not have died. but ak as soon as she reached there she tried to jump out of car without even a tought of babies or of neil.
if you cant even protect your family and loved ones. whats the use of ideals . its not heroisim its selfishness. and it was even more selfish of ak to expect abhi to let go of neil and babies because he was not the only one who has lost them.and situation demanded to prioritize the girls life over neils and babies . it was cruel to expect that.
so yes she was wrong .
because in anyother cases of misfortune in concert or anywhere else it would not have been aks fault but here the descision was of ak to risk her , her babies and neils life. or to wait.
and she choose her ideals over her family , for some it may be nobel but atleast for me its not if you cant even protect your family you claim to love , whats the use of ideals , for me and many others the regret for not saving the family will be much more than ever regret of not saving girls and its not like you cannot save girls you could have followed those goons or asked help from nearby people or went live and made aware of situations for police to act faster there were thousand ways if you would not want to risk your family .
and it was not first time she risked it so it was not situational accident but a abitual one which arises criticism that.
miscarriage is a grave term mothers go through hell to take care during preg to not let childs life in danger and here time and again she made a joke of her own complicated preg and risked her babies life.
so if she lost the babies, or she was at the lowest point in her life , it was due to her own carelessness and disregard and disrespect for lives of her babies .she never learned from that picnic experience.
and abhi disregarding her miscarriage and shouting at her , i mean if ak action was at spur of movement without thinking eventhough she risked it many times , abhi had faced three deaths it can be termed as spur of movement , but that doesnt change the fact that abhi is wrong in giving div but it also doesnt change fact ak was wrong in risking lives.
now care of abhi.
i have lost count of how many times abhi had told ak to not take risks not harm herself for others during preg , and even after all that she went ahead , what does it show that she had little to no regard and respect for abhis love and care.
and this time it had even lead to deaths . so if someone doesnt value your love and care enough to even risk their family members for their ideals abhid had a breakdown , he no longer wished to care for ak who doesnt value his love and care.
abhi had loved ak very much so if that love and care is not valued and insulted and disregarded time and again you withdrew it to simply not hurt yourself more thats what abhi had done.
now harsh and abhi.
harsh is an habitual abuser and knowingly insults manjiri love or not love is not a concern but a person who treats women not as equal and habitualy insults her infront of children that person is always the worst. human not to talk about husband because situations doesnt led him to such behaviour its his own arrognance.
on the other hand abhi on white day throwing things shouting is definitly abuse but he didnt do it to purposefully hurt her even though ak was saying you were hurting her but has ak considered how much hurt he was when she told him situation demands it so she had to put neil and babies life in danger and you have to accept it as esme meri koyi galti nahi he. thats when he told seerut ma dialogue to hurt her.
and he did it intentionally and he had apologised for it to because that was something he did intentionally and realised it .
for me harsh is worst human who is an habitual abuser and considers woman lower than himself and disrespects them . love or not love doesnt even consider and situation like miscarriage and deaths when your care is not valued before when everything was right why should that care matter now everyone has a breaking point.
abhis behaviour is abusive that day , but for me harsh is worst type of person who cant even be compared to him.
12