Who is at fault ???

Both have their shares of fault.

Sameers Faults:

Firstly , Sameer could have asked Mamaji not to show up that evening and could have postponed dinner for some other day, knowing they were barely ready to have guests in the house. Being a daughter-in-law Naina cannot refused to host Mamaji but Sameer could have definitely said no to his mamaji.

Secondly he should not asked Naina's family to join them the same day as his family. Equality in relationship is all good but calling in-laws same time with your own family kills fun for both sides, especially when they are so different from each other.

I have said earlier too that Sameer put Naina on the pedestal and was religiously devoted to her, to the extent that it felt like Naina was in the receiving end only. This type of asymmetrical devotion looks good only in papers- it is just matter of time before the partner starts to question how come I am the only one making all the effforts. I think Sameer spoiled Naina initially and Naina got used to expecting that from him. It really Sameer's fault to make Naina think it is ok to behave like a spoiled brat.

Naina's Fault:

Currently we all are not liking Naina because she is behaving like a diva and an idiot, which she never was earlier. How can any of us believe that with Taiji around, any of the girl in Agrawal family would not have basic knowledge on household chores? Although she comes from a middle class background, she is giving the vibes that her man is going to pamper her like a queen for rest of her life. By acting spoilt and pampered, she completely ignored her responsibility and in turn not only made herself look bad but also she successfully projected her husband as a henpecked wuss in front of his own family.

My personal belief is that it is not always necessary that the man is giving all his love and affection but the woman should also make him feel special. Sameer is not forcing her to get intimate, is not making her do household work, fought the entire world for her. I think Naina should also do something except yell, as to not make him regret his decision for choosing her over the rest of the world.

In conclusion, they both made mistakes - hopefully they both will learn moving forward that relationship thrives when both stand in the equal grounds and put equal efforts from both sides involved. They fought with the world earlier but now they will have to fight with their own inadequacies to make this relationship work.

Agreed both were at fault but in yesterday's epi, I felt Naina was more at fault. Sameers fault, yes yelling at her infront of both their families. Letting Poonam Bhabhi do the dishes, not noticing or questioning Naina as to where did the dirty dishes disappear? But if everyone noticed, he didn't speak up for a while, but then lost it.

I Did not like Sameer constantly taunting Naina during the HM phase, but ever since they have been back, he is trying to make the household work. Recent examples, sweeping in the kitchen, cooking from a cookbook, taking care of Naina during her periods, making tea. These are things we won't expect from Sameer because he has never had to do household chores but he is still trying, attempting.

But Naina, where do I begin. It seems as if she is from a royal household and Sameer from middle class. We are talking about the 90s here, where while women were educated, working but still they were definitely expected to take care of the household. Infact, once the girls became of marriageable age, girls were trained by their mothers. I remember a colleague, whose mom post her engagement used to ensure that she cooked for the household, morning and evening along with her job to ensure smooth transition post marriage.

Aggarwals are fairly conservative. Naina has the luxury of only being with Sam and not a joint family. Would she have behaved the same if she had gotten married to Sharad. Ever since her wedding, there have been only fleeting instances of her showing her love for Sameer. She shoos him away like a bug when he attempts to kiss her barring few times.

Mama is trying to prove that Naina is a wrong choice and succeeding because Sameer could not defend her yesterday. He had just before the fiasco said that Naina keeps the house in tip top shape, only to fall flat on his face sometime later. Yes both are responsible for their house but Naina sent him out to arrange for snacks while she dealt with the house cleaning and cooking.

I understand makers are trying to show their immaturity and all is not lovey dovey post marriage but the way they are going about is beyond me. Also, we are all feeling more disappointed because they have shown us two 16 year olds who were way more mature and supportive of each other and have sailed through so many hardships. These days they are constantly at short fuse after 4 years of deep love and understanding.

Originally posted by: USwamy

Agreed both were at fault but in yesterday's epi, I felt Naina was more at fault. Sameers fault, yes yelling at her infront of both their families. Letting Poonam Bhabhi do the dishes, not noticing or questioning Naina as to where did the dirty dishes disappear? But if everyone noticed, he didn't speak up for a while, but then lost it.

I Did not like Sameer constantly taunting Naina during the HM phase, but ever since they have been back, he is trying to make the household work. Recent examples, sweeping in the kitchen, cooking from a cookbook, taking care of Naina during her periods, making tea. These are things we won't expect from Sameer because he has never had to do household chores but he is still trying, attempting.

But Naina, where do I begin. It seems as if she is from a royal household and Sameer from middle class. We are talking about the 90s here, where while women were educated, working but still they were definitely expected to take care of the household. Infact, once the girls became of marriageable age, girls were trained by their mothers. I remember a colleague, whose mom post her engagement used to ensure that she cooked for the household, morning and evening along with her job to ensure smooth transition post marriage.

Aggarwals are fairly conservative. Naina has the luxury of only being with Sam and not a joint family. Would she have behaved the same if she had gotten married to Sharad. Ever since her wedding, there have been only fleeting instances of her showing her love for Sameer. She shoos him away like a bug when he attempts to kiss her barring few times.

Mama is trying to prove that Naina is a wrong choice and succeeding because Sameer could not defend her yesterday. He had just before the fiasco said that Naina keeps the house in tip top shape, only to fall flat on his face sometime later. Yes both are responsible for their house but Naina sent him out to arrange for snacks while she dealt with the house cleaning and cooking.

I understand makers are trying to show their immaturity and all is not lovey dovey post marriage but the way they are going about is beyond me. Also, we are all feeling more disappointed because they have shown us two 16 year olds who were way more mature and supportive of each other and have sailed through so many hardships. These days they are constantly at short fuse after 4 years of deep love and understanding.

Originally posted by: myprimechicago

CVs are confusing it too much..
Last week before kanji came, Naina completed whole house cleaning, pooja, tea, cooking... and today suddenly she and sameer left the house to get shabby and smelly?