SBB Seg - Page 4

Originally posted by: bscorp13

Aah.. that has been my wish since sauten sagas...it's never going to happen mate..he won't even come close to n dying or death..he is doomed to be tortured alive🤢..death will give him dignity .. they cant afford that na..

Its raman representing all ills and ishita representing the savior ..it's been that way for b a while except for some months .. and we were wrong when we thought it was the v story of 2 broken souls...it most certainly isn't of the ML..🥱..

Every character on tjhe b show will have POVs and justifications and redemption s..but nada..none for the ML..heck..how do b you think they plan to run the b show for 500 more epis..🥱

Originally posted by: DivanIshraru

look at them

Originally posted by: gargpoo

word..
Totally agree with last line..
Wen raman ws in hijacked plane ...romi didnt even flinched didnt try to find out his bro is alive or dead n the same btother ws saving a stranger n getting hurt..thats the difference..

Originally posted by: priyadarshini.r

Anku, IMO, the sad truth is that the perspective of CV's and some viewers are different for a ML. There is no ML as such in the show. It is only about two female leads, one main, the other parallel, but given the importance of a main, with contrasting personalities yet share the same pati. You need a male here for the pati role, but his role in the show is restricted to romancing the main female lead and shouting at others. He is really unwanted. But if you just kill him, then they have to show the FL getting involved with yet another male in the show, because she has every right to be happy in the life and her life is not dependent on her pati. But if that is shown, the TRP's would suffer a big blow as the TRP Indian audience and some modern audience cannot accept.

So there is a male lead in the show for namesake. But he is not the lead, rather an antagonist in the name of a protogonist. PERIOD.

Cheers

Priya

Originally posted by: -Anku-

See honestly, this isn't about Ishita for me. And neither about Ishita versus Raman.. I've liked both these characters for the qualities in them that I can relate to. But this general damage done to the Male Lead to take a story forward because they feel that the TRP audience doesn't care of the balance is way too cliched and regressive for me. Raman gets no point of view, no monologue, no scene to express his feelings, never shown in the right, and always needs someone to show him sense... and that's derogatory to show for a character whose been shown better than this, whose been shown striking qualities before. Then why not now?

Between IshRa, right now Raman has erred and if he is shown to do a thousand such things to seek apology I will watch and I will also not think its unfair.. But how does Romi also get to redeem himself but nothing positive gets shown for the man whose apparently the lead of this show.

My annoyance is in general with the routine way of showing men in their stories...I can't relate to it.

Originally posted by: priyadarshini.r

Anku, IMO, the sad truth is that the perspective of CV's and some viewers are different for a ML. There is no ML as such in the show. It is only about two female leads, one main, the other parallel, but given the importance of a main, with contrasting personalities yet share the same pati. You need a male here for the pati role, but his role in the show is restricted to romancing the main female lead and shouting at others. He is really unwanted. But if you just kill him, then they have to show the FL getting involved with yet another male in the show, because she has every right to be happy in the life and her life is not dependent on her pati. But if that is shown, the TRP's would suffer a big blow as the TRP Indian audience and some modern audience cannot accept.

So there is a male lead in the show for namesake. But he is not the lead, rather an antagonist in the name of a protogonist. PERIOD.

Cheers

Priya

Originally posted by: snehaseshan

Raman ishita going for date in ishita's old red car..

Originally posted by: Zoyamalik2005

this may just be a comment to make myself and my friends on the forum feel better.😆

raman's reluctance to apologise doesn't make sense to me on its own. and it got me thinking, raising my expectations too high. let me explain. the fact the cvs say this is an important part of the story got my brain to think certain things. again, I'm probably wrong, this is just making me feel better.

so disclaimer: im 98.9% just being an idiotic hopeful fool BUT part of me doesn't understand remans reluctance unless i rationalise it in the following way:

Romi messed up big time. if he hadn't made that blunder that night, both raman and ishita's daughters would be safe and sound. ishita would be with him. his dream of seeing ishita playing with their child would have come true.

ishita would never had left, because ruhi would still be alive.

so perhaps they are playing this comedy to delay Raman coming to actually say these things?

yes,raman loves his brother. but at the same time, with raman still being in denial about his part in pushing ishita away, romi is someone he majorly blames for the fact ishita left, and rudi too?

writing this made me feel better. i think cvs are playing their cards like this so that the disruption in july can be passed to then move things along.

in any case writing this made me feel better, because the cvs brand of comedy is beyond me. even if this is not depicted on the show, this is how i choose to rationalise it. but when raman does finally have his breakdown, if he does, ill rationalise this into it😆