Dear CVs - Page 4

I totally agree with your post.

No hanymoon track instead this crap surrogacy track only for shagun eyes

Originally posted by: -Gan-

so you mean to say that CVs are catering to the IF crowd? 😕

I am tired of hearing and typing about Ekta's special love for anita..so try to be diffrnt ;)

Originally posted by: sunitas123

Gan, voila! I can answer one query that you have about Romi. He already repaired all of Bala's coumputers in just one day and we got to see 2 min scene for it😆 May you FFed it thinking it was Ruhi Arora scene or maybe you blinked😉😆 that was that😃

Now that all r complaining Shagun track seems of no relevance CVs will clear that by making her surrogate mom to Ishra baby. Is that not why we are watching YHM? To see how shagun can go on carrying kids to make Raman happy and Ishita cant? So only big Ruhi can fulfil small Ruhi's demand.

I had mentioned it previously too- we were hoping for a ishra honeymoon track somewhere in Europe beg mid-Aug, but no news of that. Cvs have dished us Shagun romance track instead. Similarly Ishra baby will mean Shagun baby. Now is Shagun not the most imp person in YHM without whom the show will end?

It is strange that small Ruhi once asked about Shagun but Adi has totally forgotten her. hence a third kid to keep the bond going with Raman😡

If Shagun was really a triangle then does Manoj make it a quadrilateral?😆

Thanks I truly missed that part.😳

Originally posted by: --PriyaRay--

Shagun hasn't become the parallel lead out of nowhere, she is one important angle in this triangle.

Originally posted by: beckysharp

Dear Ms. Ray, welcome back ! It sure is strange that you pop up almost always when there is criticism about Shagun / Ruhi Arora ! I sure love your loyalty and ardent defense !

My one question to you, when did YHM become a triangle ? I always thought it was a love story between two embittered and rejected souls ! So why the justification of unnecessary thrusting of a character down the viewer throat may I ask ?

Yes Shagun is important but only as far as the fact that she is Raman's ex and the mother of Raman's children ! How exactly can a woman who betrayed her husband, was a mistress of another man, led her husband to doubt the paternity of his child, brain washed his other child against him, an important part of his life !

Seriously you guys baffle me ! Or maybe I have too many morals and ethics ?

Ugh ! the reformed shagun makes me wanna puke !

exactly.u said it all.I m yet see Mrs priya to comes up with any positive news without defend shagun character

Originally posted by: beckysharp

Dear Ms. Ray, welcome back ! It sure is strange that you pop up almost always when there is criticism about Shagun / Ruhi Arora ! I sure love your loyalty and ardent defense !

My one question to you, when did YHM become a triangle ? I always thought it was a love story between two embittered and rejected souls ! So why the justification of unnecessary thrusting of a character down the viewer throat may I ask ?

Yes Shagun is important but only as far as the fact that she is Raman's ex and the mother of Raman's children ! How exactly can a woman who betrayed her husband, was a mistress of another man, led her husband to doubt the paternity of his child, brain washed his other child against him, an important part of his life !

Seriously you guys baffle me ! Or maybe I have too many morals and ethics ?

Ugh ! the reformed shagun makes me wanna puke !

Originally posted by: beckysharp

Dear Ms. Ray, welcome back ! It sure is strange that you pop up almost always when there is criticism about Shagun / Ruhi Arora ! I sure love your loyalty and ardent defense !

My one question to you, when did YHM become a triangle ? I always thought it was a love story between two embittered and rejected souls ! So why the justification of unnecessary thrusting of a character down the viewer throat may I ask ?

Yes Shagun is important but only as far as the fact that she is Raman's ex and the mother of Raman's children ! How exactly can a woman who betrayed her husband, was a mistress of another man, led her husband to doubt the paternity of his child, brain washed his other child against him, an important part of his life !

Seriously you guys baffle me ! Or maybe I have too many morals and ethics ?

Ugh ! the reformed shagun makes me wanna puke !

Originally posted by: --PriyaRay--

Shagun hasn't become the parallel lead out of nowhere, she is one important angle in this triangle.

Originally posted by: sunitas123

Gan, voila! I can answer one query that you have about Romi. He already repaired all of Bala's coumputers in just one day and we got to see 2 min scene for it😆May you FFed it thinking it was Ruhi Arora scene or maybe you blinked😉😆that was that😃

Now that all r complaining Shagun track seems of no relevance CVs will clear that by making her surrogate mom to Ishra baby. Is that not why we are watching YHM? To see how shagun can go on carrying kids to make Raman happy and Ishita cant? So only big Ruhi can fulfil small Ruhi's demand.

I had mentioned it previously too- we were hoping for a ishra honeymoon track somewhere in Europe beg mid-Aug, but no news of that. Cvs have dished us Shagun romance track instead. Similarly Ishra baby will mean Shagun baby. Now is Shagun not the most imp person in YHM without whom the show will end?

It is strange that small Ruhi once asked about Shagun but Adi has totally forgotten her. hence a third kid to keep the bond going with Raman😡

If Shagun was really a triangle then does Manoj make it a quadrilateral?😆

Here you hit the bull's eye with your last line..
This only goes to prove that the cvs will go to any lengths just so that their favr8 shagun becomes the parallel lead.. They are claiming she is an important angle of the triangle but have already made it a quadrilateral.. They will even go ahead and make it a hexagon if required.. BUT SHAGUN IS THE PARALLEL LEAD.. RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING.. we fools didn't get it.. And i will remain a fool forever but wont accept Shagun as the parallel lead ever