An observation. - Page 2

Did sr.bhalla wrote will on ruhi????

Originally posted by: -Anku-

Yes but what is so different from the scenario back then. Raman wasn't making a decision for the company then, he was talking in a raised tone with the daughter of the house back then too. And even with Rinki in the current situation. And in both the scenes his intention was concern. Moreover similarly in both the scenes Rinki and Simmi were misbehaving as well.

If you remember around the episode I just linked, Raman even pinned a nameplate outside the house that read Dr Ishita Raman Bhalla, right below Senior Bhalla's name. Why no offence then? Why now?

If I am not mistaken, didn't Mr. Bhalla transfer the old flat at Aakash Ganga society in the name of Ruhi ?

Because previously in both cases Mr Bhalla was present there and heard the full conversation to evaluate who's on the right side unlike last time. Plus his own insecurity regarding his son must have popped up too.

Anku - 👏

Raman does say things impulsively, but now everyone is being driven by insecurity and not able to fully understand him.

In all this, only Rinki went overboard. Raman was MUed first & the rest of the MU were of Ishita only because people struggled to communicate out of pride, insecurity, & impulsivity. Most of the characters tried to see the opposite side but their fears were too overpowering.

Mr. Bhalla may have seen this as a rehash of his & Raman's fight from the Shagun era, but the same thing applies to Raman. Before only Mr. Bhalla really boycotted him, but here he feels the entire family is starting to slip away. So his grasping onto the one voice of reason in all of this - his wife. Raman was momentarily disrespectful to his father but he was already riled up. While Ishita tries to convince him, she never forces her decision on him during this track from my understanding.

What is being shown is realistic with most of the characters acting independently out of deep seated emotions, and isn't that what YHM has been about?

Originally posted by: malaxmi

He has even said Ishita a number of times that it is his house. He has even asked her to get out of the house. But none of the Bhallas reacted that time. I am a huge fan of RKB and I am justifying his act and not blaming him.

Originally posted by: mreshma

@green... I think the answer is there in ur question itself...Ishita's nameplate was below Bhallaji's nameplate, that too outside the house owned by him...Here, Raman named his company to Ishita and the very next day he saying that he is the one who looks after the expenses of this house, so his sibling should leave will definitely not sound good to a father, that too when he only heard that part of the convo...I think Raman can be easily MU...My problem with Bhallaji's attitude is he was not thinking seriously of what Rinky said that made Raman say this , though impulsively...and ignoring n insulting him totally when he was ready to apologise...anyway it's just my POV...

Originally posted by: beckysharp

If I am not mistaken, didn't Mr. Bhalla transfer the old flat at Aakash Ganga society in the name of Ruhi ?

As a father I would have expected Mr. Bhalla to at least go to the bottom of the issue n find out why Raman uttered those words to Rinki. He should have questioned Rinki too on why she was spewing venom at IshRa. He is the patriarch, rather than just standing mute, he should have shut Rinki up.

Just my pov.

Originally posted by: -MS-

Because previously in both cases Mr Bhalla was present there and heard the full conversation to evaluate who's on the right side unlike last time. Plus his own insecurity regarding his son must have popped up too.

Originally posted by: -K.13-

Anku - 👏

Raman does say things impulsively, but now everyone is being driven by insecurity and not able to fully understand him.

In all this, only Rinki went overboard. Raman was MUed first & the rest of the MU were of Ishita only because people struggled to communicate out of pride, insecurity, & impulsivity. Most of the characters tried to see the opposite side but their fears were too overpowering.

Mr. Bhalla may have seen this as a rehash of his & Raman's fight from the Shagun era, but the same thing applies to Raman. Before only Mr. Bhalla really boycotted him, but here he feels the entire family is starting to slip away. So his grasping onto the one voice of reason in all of this - his wife. Raman was momentarily disrespectful to his father but he was already riled up. While Ishita tries to convince him, she never forces her decision on him during this track from my understanding.

What is being shown is realistic with most of the characters acting independently out of deep seated emotions, and isn't that what YHM has been about?