Originally posted by: sakshi.ekansh
If History would have been repeating itself then by now Raman and "His Wife" would have left the house and their family.
If History would have been repeating itself then Raman's wife would be poisoning him against his own Dad but here i am seeing her making him realize his mistakes at the same time encouraging him to mend them and keep the things at right place..
If History would have been repeating itself then Raman would keep mum and wont try to mend his relations with his father, even by taking advice from Appa or by trying to apologize..
But now He and His Wife clearly want to bind the family in a single thread whereas in History "His then Wife was so selfish"..
History is History dear. I agree Raman was wrong talking to his Dad in the manner he did but his intentions were never wrong.. Defending your right wife who is herself trying to pacify everyone and who goes to every extend for the sake of the family is not called being JORU KA GULAAM
And believe me If Ishita would have talked the way Rinki did na He would have done the same he did with Rinki. Right is Right and Wrong is Wrong. What Raman did was a misbehavior, What Rinki did was a misbehavior but Ishita did not misbehave..
And he defended Mihir too when Rinki called him spineless.. Does that means he is a BHAI KA GULAAM too?
I am sorry to disagree but i do. There is a huge difference between History and Now.. History was conspiracy Present is Misunderstandings..
0