History repeating itself for Raman - Page 3

Originally posted by: immira

Mere bhai kahan gayab ho gaya thaa...forum looked like dead body wiooo u...🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣

first timre agree with ur post...😆.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣.🤣

Meera


Tum kaha ho

Hum to yahin hai

Har Raat ko rajma idli ki mehfil jamti hai

Originally posted by: ..Mehak..

Leo the sadest part is that Puttar doesn't have anyones suppport. His first Biwi wants him for money and other wants for kids. People are seeing Ishita's pain but nobody is ready to see Raman's pain.. he is also going through the same pain as Ishita. Ishita has family support. Raman doesn't have that also. Everyone tried to console Ishita but exceot for Bala nobody tried to console Raman..

Absolutely agree

That is sad part

Even for his family

If they had to choose Raman or ishita

They would choose ishita

Originally posted by: ankitasen

I would say Ishita's character hasn't been sketched too well. Some will argue that she's a closed book but I would say she's a confused soul, rather CVs are confused how to sketch her character. She's got two dimensions, a mother and a wife/lover. In order to over glorify one aspect of her, they mess it up with the other one. Some sort of balance is badly needed in my opinion.

I don't fully agree with your premise but at the same time I can't ignore it either. See, this is the dilemma of her characterization. I can ignore her venomous words but I can't ignore her actions.

For once, I want to see Ishita-Raman equation without Ruhi. I want to see how will Ishita react as a wife if Ruhi is not there.

As they say action speaks louder than words

And her actions support my premise


For your other point

I think she would see through ramsn without ruhi

I strongly feel that Ishita and Raman relationship won't survive without Ruhi..

Their relations starts with " Sirf Ruhi ke liye " and ends with " Sirf Ruhi ke liye "

Ishita- Raman love can be termed as need fight against their loneliness.

Please stop drawing parallels between Shagun and Ishita. Shagun married Raman for Raman and left him for money but Ishita married for the sake of Ruhi only and even now she said the same thing, that the basis of our relationship is Ruhi and if she is not there means we are not there. Neither Ishita never Raman claimed they were in love and then got married.

Originally posted by: --mancityfan--

As they say action speaks louder than words

And her actions support my premise


For your other point

I think she would see through ramsn without ruhi

Well, you can say that. Her latest action is very hasty and in no way I can't defend her. Some might say it's her "selfless love" for Ruhi but I would call it obsession. If she had taken this action after losing the custody case, it might make some sense. But without a hearing, this move of her is unpalatable.

Originally posted by: mayu1982

I strongly feel that Ishita and Raman relationship won't survive without Ruhi..

Their relations starts with " Sirf Ruhi ke liye " and ends with " Sirf Ruhi ke liye "

Ishita- Raman love can be termed as need fight against their loneliness.

Well said. That's why I want to see Raman-Ishita equation without Ruhi for once.

Ishita is mother for sure she will chose motherhood over her rule as wife she said very clear yesterday she is mother first and then wife any mother in the world put her kids over the world except Apshagun . Ishita is in shocked status her mind and out of service her heart deeply hurt and in pain when Raman was mad and crazy about adi that fine with you guys but if ishita get mad in ruhi love she mad crime why this double standard

Originally posted by: deejagi

Please stop drawing parallels between Shagun and Ishita. Shagun married Raman for Raman and left him for money but Ishita married for the sake of Ruhi only and even now she said the same thing, that the basis of our relationship is Ruhi and if she is not there means we are not there. Neither Ishita never Raman claimed they were in love and then got married.

And Ishita has not taken away Ruhi from Raman but from Shagun. SHe will come back with Ruhi to court and put forth her points. She is worried now as Shagun so fiercely said that Tshita will never get back her Ruhi. No one can predict Shagun and her intentions, So Ishita has taken Ruhi away from Shagun till such time the courts are open for preceding's.

Why bring up past

Thry married for that condition

But she claims to live him

So this condition should not be there

Originally posted by: deejagi

Please stop drawing parallels between Shagun and Ishita. Shagun married Raman for Raman and left him for money but Ishita married for the sake of Ruhi only and even now she said the same thing, that the basis of our relationship is Ruhi and if she is not there means we are not there. Neither Ishita never Raman claimed they were in love and then got married.

And Ishita has not taken away Ruhi from Raman but from Shagun. SHe will come back with Ruhi to court and put forth her points. She is worried now as Shagun so fiercely said that Tshita will never get back her Ruhi. No one can predict Shagun and her intentions, So Ishita has taken Ruhi away from Shagun till such time the courts are open for preceding's.