you deleted my post from yesterday, and I just wanted some clarification as to why.
This is what you wrote:
Divyanka is an independent person and has the right to do whatever she feels with her professional and personal life ,just because an actor happens to be on social media (themelves or via PR team ) it doesnt give us the right to comment on how they should conduct themselves or make assumptions regarding the same .Its upto them how they want to project themselves ,deal with their fans etc
Discussing External content is not allowed on IF and also if you have suggestions for Divyanka feel free to send them to her via her social media accts instead ofpassing a judgement here and making her life a private property of fans
TOPIC CLOSED
YHM DT
The first paragraph where you call me out, no problems there, you're crystal clear. You don't seem to like what I posted...that's fine, I disagree with you. Her being on social media, the public forum, does give me the right to make comments...as a matter of fact she herself has asked for comments...anywho I digress.
It's really the second paragraph that I have an issue with...starting with the @Bold part. You seem to cite this particular reason, me discussing external content in my topic, as reasons for dropping the gauntlet on my ass.
However, if this is the case then you need to go and delete all the previous topics on the forum that bring in "external content". As a matter of fact there is a post, which is still fully open, where the topic maker has posted freeze frame pics of Divyanka Tripathi's Instagram...clearly this is the "external content" you seem to be up in arms about.
There are many other examples by the way, to choose from (all SBB/SBS posts for example are external content), and yet you chose mine.
The question is why?
You clearly didn't like what I said...but is that reason enough to delete my post? No, it's not. If I have broken some rules then let me know exactly what they were, and then apply them universally, otherwise reinstate my post.
Thanks,
Sunny