Originally posted by: Aeryn
Bhallas and Mihir lying can't excuse Ishita's behaviour.
There is no point of meddling so much like that. Yes Iyers have a right to know the truth about the man they intend for their daughter to marry. Being concerned is normal.
BUT
Iyers accepted Mihir not sharing his past. They have accepted the status quo. If it was so important for them, bothered them so much not to know the truth then they should have talked it out with him and refused the alliance if he didn't want to comply.
Them lying is absolutely no excuse for Ishita to dig into Mihir's past and try to force him to mend his estranged relationship. I can't agree on the point that it is their attitude that makes it reasonable for her to meddle this much. Talking it out and demanding to know is fine but digging behind his back is not.
Ishita inviting Sanjana to her sister's party was again callous, uncalled for. How can she not think that it would inevitably caused tension and drama? Why ruin a family celebration?
Btw I think it should be Mihir's decision to share about his family. He should be the one telling the truth, not Bhallas. To Raman's credit, he did try to tell Mihir that it was time for him to open up. That shows that he is just respecting Mihir's feelings but does think that Iyers should know.