Posted:
After the seven year leap, Raavi was shown to be in early stages of pregnancy. I assumed that since she was a newborn before the leap, Preet was seven and a bit post leap (as in an exact seven year leap). That was in June.
Suddenly, in August, Preet was eight years old! How??? Raavi wasn't even showing yet! Just before the next leap, she was heavily pregnant with Babli. Even Simran was pregnant by then but Raavi was still pregnant.
Following the ten year leap, Preet is now said to be eighteen years old.
I'm so confused. Either Raavi was pregnant for more than a year and Babli was severely overdue or the seven year leap was more of an eight year leap (like a seven year ten month leap). If the latter is true, that means Preet and Raj were only friends for a few months whereas Sakshi Devi and Raj have been friends for ten years. 🤢
I am very OCD with characters' ages. I could see that child Nihaal and Pammi were clearly older than Raj. I even thought that Nihaal could be older than Rohan. But post leap they're showing that Nihaal and Pammi are younger than Raj. WHAAAT? But Raj called Pammi Didi! I thought she was around twenty one years old! You telling me that eighteen year old Pammi and twenty three (????) year old Gunjan were arranged to marry the same man? That's weird. This age thing annoys me.
Can't figure out who's how old and how much time elapsed between the seven year leap and the ten year leap.
Kumkum Bhagya
