Why Vishnu? - Page 3

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

731627

Suspended

Posted: 11 years ago

#21

another thing by applying short cut to earn money that is by hurting himself delibrately and earning money vishnu is doing nothing great , infact he is creating problem for himself and creating problem for his family too .by such wierd act problem will not decrease but it will be increase more .by hurting himself deliberately vishnu cant able to earn money for long term

Quote

ruhi86

@ruhi86

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#22

Originally posted by: rosy94
@ruhi agree! if tomorrow Vishnu becomes a rich and reputed bissunessman and has a daughter. And his daughter loves and marries someone not so rich who due to unfortunate circumstances looses his job. His daughter cant even get basic stuff for the family!He would surely expect his son in law to take some help from him. Help him in his bussiness. Vishnu shld also do the same!!

He can atleast work as an employee and repay by working hard for d company making RPR proud
Like this everyone will b happy
I blame CVs for this, they just can't let any couple live happily even for a few days

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#23

Originally posted by: rosy94

rosy i agree wid almost whole of ur post even this that vishnu is not doing rite like standing in front of car etc.i m not saying its rite or its a self-respect.

thatswhy i m saying that CVs r ruining vishnu's ckt by making him 2 do like this.and even if vishnu is doing this stupidity then also mkta is responsible 4 it.oderwise vishnu even did waiter's job wen he didn't get any job in ofc.

why now hes shown doing this like going in front of the car 2 earn money??

i m only saying that he shud himself find a gud job in newspapers like he was doing wen they were @ damini's after he came back from coma.

but its CVs ploy 2 make mkta mahaanwhos doing sum great service & is sum pativrata.

@bold blue but i don't agree wid u on this. why shud vishnu agree 2 do rpr's business ?? its not his

and hes like son not son. if mkta wants 2 do her father's business then she can do but why vishnu shud do just 2 make that cheap woman happy??this is not gender biasedness of vishnu.he doesn't want his so-called FIL's business on platter.its the inherent quality of mkta & her family 2 snatch or beg not vishnu.

and even if u r family then 2 why shud he ask 4 such type of help?? yes if there r vacancies in veer's business & he applies there & got job on basis of his talent & then rise 2 the top level & then handle the business then its rite.

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#24

no1 is saying that vishnu's this act is rite.

but the quesn is why hes shown doing this if we go by vishnu's initial ckt portrayal & inherent nature which is shown??

bcoz its 2 show mkta as sum mahaan devi whos pativrata which shes not.

i agree wid rosy that she doesn't luv even vishnu oderwise why naani is there wid them always & also taunting vishnu day & nite??why can't she ask her 2 go away?

wat mkta says wen naani taunts vishnu naani plz talk not loudly vihsnu will listen.wats this??shes more concerned abt vishnu's hearing all this & not that she shud stop naani from doing this so that vishnu don't hav 2 go in such humiliation & insults.bcoz she herself is like naani & just pretending 2 b goody 2 shoes & pativrata.

i won't b srprsd if CVs in cuming epis show her doing sumthingwid sum1 like aksh did wid chameli or "kiska bacha kiske sar" nautunki sum1else 's kid on vishnu's head.🤢

but she won't do that 2 naani bcoz she her naatin & inherited naani's nature of giving taunts & curse 2 those wid whom shes not happy.🤢🤢🤢

Edited by tiny15 - 11 years ago

Quote

Treason_Damon

@Treason_Damon

Navigator

Posted: 11 years ago

#25

Originally posted by: tiny15
rosy i agree wid almost whole of ur post even this that vishnu is not doing rite like standing in front of car etc.i m not saying its rite or its a self-respect.
thatswhy i m saying that CVs r ruining vishnu's ckt by making him 2 do like this.and even if vishnu is doing this stupidity then also mkta is responsible 4 it.oderwise vishnu even did waiter's job wen he didn't get any job in ofc.
why now hes shown doing this like going in front of the car 2 earn money??
i m only saying that he shud himself find a gud job in newspapers like he was doing wen they were @ damini's after he came back from coma.
but its CVs ploy 2 make mkta mahaanwhos doing sum great service & is sum pativrata.
@bold blue but i don't agree wid u on this. why shud vishnu agree 2 do rpr's business ?? its not his
and hes like son not son. if mkta wants 2 do her father's business then she can do but why vishnu shud do just 2 make that cheap woman happy??this is not gender biasedness of vishnu.he doesn't want his so-called FIL's business on platter.its the inherent quality of mkta & her family 2 snatch or beg not vishnu.

and even if u r family then 2 why shud he ask 4 such type of help?? yes if there r vacancies in veer's business & he applies there & got job on basis of his talent & then rise 2 the top level & then handle the business then its rite.

Ya exactly my point dear! Vishnu was not like this! And what he has turned into is certainly not acceptable! Cv's have ruined this character completely.

Why can not Vihsnu take up rathore's bussiness? He is Ratjore's son in law! Isnt it gender baisedness? So that means Rathore's bussiness will end here? When we say daughters and son are equal, it is a fact! Who asked Vishnu to beg for bussiness. it is his right and his duty! Since Rathore has only one daughter so as Rathore's son in law, Visnu should take care of bussiness. And the fact is he is capable of that. It would have been an entirely different issue if Vishnu was not capable of handling a huge bussiness!! when he can work so efficiently for uvraj then why cant he run Rathore's bussiness? He refused to take home from Rathore, that is acceptable. Its fine. But Rathore has established a huge bussiness but that bussiness with go no where just because Rathore has only one daughter and no son?

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#26

Originally posted by: rosy94

Agree! Both son and daughter are equal!!
Rathore did give Vishnu and Mukta share of his house on their wedding!!

rosy son & daughter r equal but vishnu is not rpr's son. hes SIL.if vishnu was working in rpr or veer's business & then got rise & bcum CEO on basis of his talent then it wud b abt son & daughter equal thing but not now.

if mkta wants 2 handle rpr's business she can but why she shud expecting vishnu 2 do rpr's business & also 2 eat on his money??if hes gender biased then he wudn't'd allowed mkta 2work or drive taxi & sitting himself @ home?? he has no prob wid earning of his wife 7 he himself not doing any job & taking care of the kid.

if he has ego then he wud'd taunted her abt pretending 2 work 2 run the home??but hes not doing this & never even said like this.

naani is taunting him abt eating on mkta's money. now tell me if u get such taunts & insults every time & ur spouse is also defending u strongly how will u feel??

Quote

731627

Suspended

Posted: 11 years ago

#27

vishnu can take loan and can start his own business

Quote

ruhi86

@ruhi86

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#28

Originally posted by: surabhi01
vishnu can take loan and can start his own business

Yes exactly, or even NGO
I want a better track for Vishnu n MuktA

Quote

Treason_Damon

@Treason_Damon

Navigator

Posted: 11 years ago

#29

Originally posted by: tiny15
rosy son & daughter r equal but vishnu is not rpr's son. hes SIL.if vishnu was working in rpr or veer's business & then got rise & bcum CEO on basis of his talent then it wud b abt son & daughter equal thing but not now.
if mkta wants 2 handle rpr's business she can but why she shud expecting vishnu 2 do rpr's business & also 2 eat on his money??if hes gender biased then he wudn't'd allowed mkta 2work or drive taxi & sitting himself @ home?? he has no prob wid earning of his wife 7 he himself not doing any job & taking care of the kid.
if he has ego then he wud'd taunted her abt pretending 2 work 2 run the home??but hes not doing this & never even said like this.
naani is taunting him abt eating on mkta's money. now tell me if u get such taunts & insults every time & ur spouse is also defending u strongly how will u feel??

Agree with you! yes firstly Mukta should think about Rathore's bussiness as hs daughter.

But atleast Vishnnu can do somethibg good. He is young educated smart and efficient! This accident drama and getting mone is unbearable and unimaginale! Agree he is very supportive but what he is doing right now is wrong! if nor rpr's bussiness then he can do some other job. He is qualified, educated efficient!