[QUOTE
[/QUOTE
[/QUOTE]
I see HIM bowing before her every wish . Right from the stormy night when she delayed the going to fetch the baby thing by posing stupid untimely questions to him about U want me WITH or WITHOUT the baby to the incident where she asked him U want to make a choice between ME or ICHA ...one episode back , when he tried to make her see things for once by keeping aside personal emotion ...and focussiong only on the baby . Even there he sighed and humored her just as he had humored her on the stormy night .
There is a possibility that now she will start competing with Yuvraj and its here that she will lose AGAIN . She will believe Nani now when Nani tells her that see Rathod loves Yuvraj more than u ...he brought Icha in to give him milk although u forbade it .
She has this pathological need to be placed FIRST . Be it a choice between her and Icha or a choice between Her own baby and Herself or a choice between Yuvraj and herself .
Rathod focussing on Yuvraj's needs and giving a damn about her personal issues with Icha WON"T go down well with her . Babies who go thru the problem Yuvraj is going thru ...And trust me I have seen this happening in real life ...the problem of making them take feeds but they crying for breast milk as they have tasted it ...the mother having died within few days of delivering etc ...Such babies actually become malnutrioned or die .
Rathod is only focussing on keeping the baby healthy and alive . Neither is he picking Icha over her , nor is he remotely attracted to Icha , nor does he want to hurt Tapasya . Its none of the 3 things .
Tapasya can take care of her emotions and survive as she is an adult . But the defenceless baby may not as he needs an elder to take decisions for him .
Tapasya may be good to the child as she does not really have a bad heart . But his Father AND mother is actually Rathod . That kind of connection Tapasya simply does not have . She is just not the type .She did not even have it with HER baby .
Rathod gives a damn if What Icha did was right or wrong . Things have gone beyond the point . He is focussing only on the present .
He himself was raised by a Daijaa ...not a mother . In Rajasthani or even other Hindu sub castes , many a times when breast milk is insufficient in a mother , the child is given to someone who has just delivered a baby , has excess of it and is willing to feed it .
Thousands of Indian children in villages etc r raised this way .Even in joint families .
For Rathod its simply a practical issue .
Each time Tapasya cannot make it into a CHOOSE ME issue . One day he might just do that and she will get REALLY hurt . As that will be HER loss more than his . He is a wonderful husband that any woman would kill to have . For once she should keep her ego aside , discard Nani's poison and UNDERSTAND him .
[/QUOTE] @kools welcum back !! 🤗u came after so many days!!🤗and perfectly said!! 😆😆😆taps is actually an attention seeker whow ants attention all 2 herself at the cost of oders & even now also competing wid ababy. earlier she used 2 compete wid ichha from the childhood after she came 2 know that icchha is better than her in studies after icchha overcame the prob of language intially. and how she behaved wid her wen at school icchha got the attention of the teachers & students alike!!until icchha wasn't at her level whether in studies or oder things shesperfectly fine wid it & even don the halo of her mentor but the day icchha started getting attention 4 her qualities from all she started jealous of her!!
it was like suddenly praising her toy more than her but she wat she wanted/s that ever1 shud praise her 4 possessing such a toy!!
ther r many ppl who r attention seekers & even common ppl also wants sum attention but not like taps. wen ever sum1 wants attention 4 their gud work then its ok but the way she wants is noneither justified nor practical!!
and i agree wid u abt this mother's milk!! though many babies can tolerate bottle milk or powder milk but it doesn't mean its gud or we shud make such a small baby go thru such a pain or rather i say its cruelity 2wards sum days old baby by refusing him giving his natural need wen u can've option!!and not all babies can tolerate. sum may show aversion after sum days 7 sum instantly & sum never.
wen we at an adult age can't tolerate sum1 forcing their views or tastes etc. on us then why r ppl time again saying that force it on a 6-7 days old baby who can't understand. & saying he"ll b fussy but hav 2 take it. why r ppl not undestand this simple fact!!
and i totally agree wid rathore bcoz wen u've an option available then just bcoz u doesn't get along wid sum1 u force a small baby 2 go thru this!! if hes 7-8 yrs. old or older than then can b forced 2 make him understand abt right & wrong!!and here rathore is more concerned as abt kid.
kools i completely agree wid ur whole post barring taps'ven't bad heart bcoz she doesn't've bad heart but an evil, overjealous, attention seeker heart!!😆😆
and if theres a choice btn a baby'd natural need which is