Section 306 - Page 11

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

515955

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#101

Amazed.....Amazed........Amazed.................hahahaahahahaa.......defending a habitual criminal is also a creative thing....I also come to this thread Hima to read and laugh to my heart's content how people can be creative in defending criminals.........I must admit there are a few very very creative people out there who have creative arguments of defending attempt to murder of Ichha.......bride swapping......emotional torture.....breaking up homes.......lying to own parents.....provoking somebody to kill oneself......You need really a creative brains unparalleled to defend such inhumane, insane, atrocious action on the part of a human being.

Regarding loving or hating a fictional character. Don't people love or hate James Bon. Did he ever exist? Why people admire, love or hate that character? Did the character Harry Potter ever exist? Why there is so much debate surrounding it? Did Batman or Spiderman ever exist in this world? They are all fictional character. Right. But people, more intelligent, more brilliant than you and me have over the years discussed, admired and criticized them. So admiring, criticizing or admonishing any fictional character has been there from time immemorial.

You dont like my views. I do not like your views. Srk does not subscribe to view of others. Others also do not subscribe her views. It is a democratic country. You may or may not like my views. Like we never put brakes on anybody's views, others are also expected to do the same. But the bottom-line is it should not be personal and should be decent enough to be in an open forum.

And yes, if you subscribe to any view you should be tolerant enough to attract criticism for that view. If not, you should not air any views at all. As simple as that.

Quote

515955

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#102

Originally posted by: hima_123

a mother was narrating the story of rabbit and tortoise to her 2 kids.

Now one of the kids was in love with rabbits, and didn't like the idea of rabbit being beaten in the race. So he created a new angle in the story, that the rabbit woke up, felt bad for sleeping during the race...ran fast..and defeated the tortoise just in time.
The second kid, started fighting with the first kid....about making the rabbit win-he said that the rabbit really doesnt deserve to win....and started accusing the first kid ....just for the sake of a story.

Now did the first kid do anything really wrong?...He just used some creativity to twist the story to revolve it around his favorite rabbit..it was just a story-what was so wrong with playing with its characters a bit? Does it really mean the first kid had less morals? How immature it is to pass judgments on someone based on simply how he wants to hear a fictional story.

Yes, I am talking about the situation here.......its just a story, and fictional things could be moulded in any way the reader/audience likes....coz we are judging something thats not even there.......so why can't we really laugh over a tragic situation in a drama, or admire a negative character if it doesn't even exist.......or add some creativity to make our so called villain look better than the rest..!!

And please don't say the rabbit cannot be compared to Tapasya's negative character.......the way there was an analogy that no one can be thhoda sa pregnent....same way neither of the 2 characters can be thhoda saa fictional.....and any fictional character can be moulded in the way we want it to...😛...and anyone who fights with us on that...is really fighting over nothing..like that second kid in the story above...😃...now a question- if you blame a real person for his interpretation of an unreal and non existent story-that blaming it an act of a foolish or a wise person?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the topic starter...even killing someone during an act of self defense is not a crime. In the books of lawwhat happened would be considered a suicide, not murder.
However creatives and audience can choose their own system of laws for a villain they hate...😛..its called creative freedom...and we are not arguing about that.😊
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't really come to forum too often, but I like some creative people here...and when others bash them, I don't like it😳..... about me-I don't have hatred or liking for any fictional charcater(though I like Rashmi's acting..but I can't love or hate Tapasya coz she doesnt exist).......but I come to this forum to see creative ideas of some of my frds..and I hate to see them being bashed just coz of their out of the box thinking and creative juices....., I am sure they would never support a real life crime....and its just a serial, and we can interpret it the way we want to.

I would have appreciated this if you were a neutral visitor to this forum. You are a proclaimed Veeya Fan-so the Veeya Forum thread says. So it is natural you will interpret things from Taps point of view (or rather the more vocal supporter SRK's point of view). There is no point in pretending to take sides. Most of the forum members have taken sides. Either they love Tappu's character deeds and admire her evil deeds or like me who hate these acts and the character. But yes, I have lots of respect for Rashmi as a human being or actor like all other artistic people around. So dont tell me that you are neutral and urge us to subscribe to your views. If you dont like these discussions, simply ignore them as we (at least me) just look at Veeya thread and laugh these away.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

sonia77

@sonia77

Dazzler

Posted: 15 years ago

#103

Who says India forum is a waste of time!!...let alone law students even an average person can get such good knowledge from such like threads...😆.........vow!!!...i wonder if the creatives visit this forum ever because if they did sure they too will be amazed at the kind of effect the show is having!!!

Edited by sonia77 - 15 years ago

Quote

Sania

@SRKLuvr

Stunner

Posted: 15 years ago

#104

sonia ji affect is happening on me! this stupid show is driving me nuts! just now i told my parents what was shown on sbs and when my dad (to tease me) said now ichha will become mrs vee singh bundela (🤢) i swear to god I burst into tears...just couldnt bear this!😭
🤬

Quote

515955

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#105

Never mind SRK. It is only a show. Take it as it comes. Hope your views becomes a little rational. Any way I respect to your views and you are fully entitled to yours. But sometimes I feel it is a little weird.

Quote

Payel Roy

@payel_roy

Dazzler

Posted: 15 years ago

#106

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr
sonia ji affect is happening on me! this stupid show is driving me nuts! just now i told my parents what was shown on sbs and when my dad (to tease me) said now ichha will become mrs vee singh bundela (🤢) i swear to god I burst into tears...just couldnt bear this!😭
🤬

hey u shoud'nt take such shows so seriously srkluver...😊.

Quote

roms123

@roms123

Beginner

Posted: 15 years ago

#107

When have the serials followed the indian or any other law. But what Tapasya has done throughout is so not right . She keeps on bettering herself in her villianious acts and feels more and mor eproud of her kartoots. The character should get a fitting punsihment if the creatives have even an ouce of spine left.

Edited by roms123 - 15 years ago

Quote

Sania

@SRKLuvr

Stunner

Posted: 15 years ago

#108

well see she isnt feeling happy!😭 I am feeling utterly weird atm! I think what my dad said really shook me up...I cannot stand intermarriages at all! I dunno but I get really mad and uncontrollable seeing anything about them!

Quote

515955

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#109

Judge by yourself if Tappu is evil or not. For some however, Tappu is not evil, still as pure as Sita mata or Ganga Mainya.

Sab mile bolo "Tappu Mata ki jay'
Humne Ichha Ko marne ki kosish ki, Phir bhi hum evil nahin, "Bolo Tara Tara"
Humne jabardasti Shaddi ki, Phir bhi hum evil nahin, "Bolo Tara Tara"
Humne apni pati ko park mein humiliate kiya, Phir bhi hum evil nahin, "Bolo Tara Tara"
humne apni papa se jhut bola, Phir bhi hum evil nahin, "Bolo Tara Tara"
Humne bundela parivar ko barbad kiya, Phir bhi hum evil nahin, "Bolo Tara Tara"
Humne Vaansh Bhaiya ko use kiya, Phir bhi hum evil nahin, "Bolo Tara Tara"
Humari kadwa batein Vaansh Bhaiya ko majbur kiya suicide ke liya, Phir bhi hum evil
nahin, "Bolo Tara Tara"
Hamari kartoot ke liye, hamari pati ko police arrest kiya, Phir bhi hum evil nahin, "Bolo
Tara Tara"
Hum Sid se affair kiye they, par apni patiko abtak nahin batay, Phir bhi hum evil nahin,
"Bolo Tara Tara"
Hamari liye do parivar barbad ho gaye, Phir bhi hum evil nahin,
"Bolo Tara Tara"
Humne Ichha ki chhithi badli, kyon ke woh sach bolna chati thi, Phir bhi hum evil nahin,
"Bolo Tara Tara"

Quote

Sania

@SRKLuvr

Stunner

Posted: 15 years ago

#110

In my view lambooo ji they only ones u can use fairly are the shaadi (which is not evil) the murdeer attempt (which was evil) the letter swap (not evil) the photo exhibition (not evil) and the rest of them were just stupidities and the suicide was definitely not intended! many of the others werent intended so they cannot be called evil! her only aim was to barbaad ichha! she is very wrong but not evil!

Quote

1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15

Section 306 - Page 11

Related Topics

Explore Topics