Why Ved filed wrong charges on Uma

Page

Next Last

Manasa Rekha

@manasa.123

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

I had few questions about Rathi family.

I can understand Kanak frozen state and saying yes.

But We are forgetting one angle.

Both Ved and Vansh (even bhabho) know that Uma wrote half of property to Kanak.

Kanak didn't hide that from anyone.

Then how come Ved being an IPS officer is allowing those charges filed against Uma ?

May be kanak confused the same way how her own family is ignoring all these things and encouraging her to give a report on wrong things.

If she is saying no then it's against her family. She clearly don't want to go back to Uma with confusion. Her existance in her own family being questioned as they emotionally encouraging her to ignore the faults done by her.

My biggest question is why Ved allowed wrong statement being given by Kanak when he clearly knows that Uma wrote half of property legally to Kanak.

Edited by manasa.123 - 8 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

What does property have to do with the charges? The charges 've to do with the forced marriage n cruelty during marriage such as shudhikaraan. Nothing to do with the shop. The shop sale in any event was fraud. Bhabho didn't sell it. So that whole transaction would be voided by a court - civil matter unless either Uma or Rathis want to bring fraud charges against Aditya, who is missing, or Mishri, who is dead

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

priyanwada

@priyankumupal

Rocker

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ
What does property have to do with the charges? The charges 've to do with the forced marriage n cruelty during marriage such as shudhikaraan. Nothing to do with the shop. The shop sale in any event was fraud. Bhabho didn't sell it. So that whole transaction would be voided by a court - civil matter unless either Uma or Rathis want to bring fraud charges against Aditya, who is missing, or Mishri, who is dead

I agree fully.

Quote

Manasa Rekha

@manasa.123

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ
What does property have to do with the charges? The charges 've to do with the forced marriage n cruelty during marriage such as shudhikaraan. Nothing to do with the shop. The shop sale in any event was fraud. Bhabho didn't sell it. So that whole transaction would be voided by a court - civil matter unless either Uma or Rathis want to bring fraud charges against Aditya, who is missing, or Mishri, who is dead

Because Arpita clearly asked she may not able to file these charges if Kanak did any cheating or took anything from Uma.

Like if she took property from Uma, She took it because she accepted him as husband. Then how the marriage became forceful ?

Legally it will look like that she did the marriage for the property.

Nobody in ladnoo is going to give any witness that the marriage happened forcefully.

Then the property ownership will be questioned and will put kanak's confession questionalble.

Isn't?

Edited by manasa.123 - 8 years ago

Quote

Deepthy

@deeps07

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ
What does property have to do with the charges? The charges 've to do with the forced marriage n cruelty during marriage such as shudhikaraan. Nothing to do with the shop. The shop sale in any event was fraud. Bhabho didn't sell it. So that whole transaction would be voided by a court - civil matter unless either Uma or Rathis want to bring fraud charges against Aditya, who is missing, or Mishri, who is dead

exactly..infact dnt see the point in this comparison of some lame lies with a criminal offense in human rights..and moreover..its not like she stole the papers or anything..uma signed the documents in full conscience..anyways..it would have been better if kanak told the whole thing that happened...atleast it would help to make better judgement by law...and i seriously dnt want kanak immersed in guilt for filing complaint..not telling the whole.thinh.means cv are going to.show kanaks.guilt on this..and uma.being the ultimate.mahaan..

Edited by deeps07 - 8 years ago

Quote

Star_Wonder

@Star_Wonder

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

All VedAnsh wants is to keep Uma away from Kanak. No matter what route they take. Right now, Ved is acting more like a brother rather than an IPS.

Quote

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: manasa.123

Because Arpita clearly asked she may not able to file these charges if Kanak did any cheating or took anything from Uma.

Like if she took property from Uma, She took it because she accepted him as husband. Then how the marriage became forceful ?

Legally it will look like that she did the marriage for the property.

Nobody in ladnoo is going to give any witness that the marriage happened forcefully.
Then the property ownership will be questioned and will put kanak's confession questionalble.

Isn't?

Arpita asked if she harmed or destroyed their property. Kanak did not hurt them. She was also honest with Uma before they went to the property office. In any event the whole store not just the half that Uma transferred is the Rathis. The sale to Uma n Aditya was illegal as it took place under false pretenses. Bhabho had no clue.

Quote

Deepthy

@deeps07

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

what i ddont understand is uma.knew for what he was signinh the document..he knew he was transfering 50% of property in her name...so how can it be said that that property deal was illegal or any cheating has taken place..she told hwr whole truth before transfer..if he wanted he could have not signed the docs..so where is the crime here from kanak..and regarding emotiinal hurt.to uma and family..really..the whole family.just looked on when uma was forcely doing pheras..kanak biting and screaming..did they even hesitate a bit thinking that she is a women..none of her family.member ia there..disnt they have no responsibility to ask her hand from.her family before directly taking her to.mandap..and in front of such people kanaks lie of coming back is treated like some unspeakable crime..i accept..shiv sarasand maasa.has always been sweet..but kanak too was always sweet with everyone..she was even aweet with palomi..if she wanred she could have cheqted uma to.sign the papers in her name and eloped again..but she didnt do.anything like that..she did all sorts of taska aa per his wish and then aquired the papers..that too only 50%..

ok lets say lets forget everything and have a fresh start..then too uma is harassing her by coming 3 times a day at her home and then ordering them that he will.take her back..what should a parent or sibling do then..sit and wait and try to reason..they already did.it..still not backinh..then their.only option.is go legal..

Quote

Ziah

@ziah

Navigator

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ
What does property have to do with the charges? The charges 've to do with the forced marriage n cruelty during marriage such as shudhikaraan. Nothing to do with the shop. The shop sale in any event was fraud. Bhabho didn't sell it. So that whole transaction would be voided by a court - civil matter unless either Uma or Rathis want to bring fraud charges against Aditya, who is missing, or Mishri, who is dead

The courts would not say that the transaction is void. They did purchase the shop. It was Mishri's fraud. The shop was rightfully sold.

Quote

AnjanaYYZ

@AnjanaYYZ

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: ziah

The courts would not say that the transaction is void. They did purchase the shop. It was Mishri's fraud. The shop was rightfully sold.

Sorry Ziah. Mishri is not the owner of the shop. She was never the owner. The only person who could have sold the property was Bhabho and its clear she had no idea what she was agreeing to. So, the sale to the Toshniwals would not be upheld by any court of law.

Hypothetically ask yourself this. You have a house. It is in your legal name. Can your neighbour or even your child sell it without your authorization? NO. They cannot. Mishri could not sell the store to anyone. Nor could anyone buy it from her. The Rathis are in the right here. It's legally Bhabho's store. Kanak ALWAYS had the law on her side. She just didn't want to risk Bhabho's health by taking the legal route and taking Uma to court. The Law is not with the Toshniwals. Not at all.

The only charges the Toshniwals can bring is against (1) Mishri - a dead girl and (2) Aditya - a missing man and Uma's brother.

In fact - the whole transaction or transfer btwn Uma and Kanak makes no sense. It's Bhabho's store. These hubby-wife are sharing property that doesn't belong to either of them. Bhabho could easily take them both to court and get the store back in her own name. As the transfer from her to Uma was not legal. The transaction there after was not legal either. Now in some countries there is a concept called "adverse possession' - but, even that would not be applicable here because Bhabho always maintained physical possession of the store.

People want to be morally offended by Kanak misleading the Toshniwals for 20 days. For hurting and dumping Uma. That's fair. But, there was no legal impropriety on her part.

Edited by AnjanaYYZ - 8 years ago

Quote

1 2

Wrong

Why Ved filed wrong charges on Uma

Related Topics

Explore Topics