Amazing how Sahiba going out of the way to save Angads life is fine but if she goes to the aid of a child, she's blamed. How would she know that something so horrible could happen. She went with good intentions only.
If she is daredevil to save Angad or his pathetic family members its all good. Infact thats her duty. But she won't even get credit. Recklessness is only fine if it's for Angad, not for an innocent child.
But if somebody else harms her or Angad/his family - its all her fault.
No one will be more broken than her if she loses her child. Everyone is connected to this child, but no one more than Sahiba herself
The regressive mentality is appalling to me.
Ok maybe she could have been smart, planned better. But its itv crap. Shes done same stuff before but no one was mad. Angad has been reckless too but he was never called stupid or blamed. she acted on impulse true to her core character. She didn't have time. Police was called. They came late. She's the kind of person that can forgive Angad, Jasleen, Manbeer, Gary, Seerat etc etc despite their crimes. So why wouldn't she run and go to save a little girl who called her for help ?! She didn't assess the situation well but she was too far in to change minds and abort her plan midway.
If Angad had been called in place of Sahiba , he'd have probably done the same thing but he would never be blamed for someone's death.
Even if we accept she was reckless, to blame her for death is cruel.
She's almost lost her life due to the people Angad, Brars supported - Seerat, Veer etc. No one blamed Angad or brars then. She risked her life recklessly to save Angad from Rumi. No one called her stupid then ๐
When Angad does dare devilry, he was never judged so harshly but the rules change for Sahiba
Angad risked everything during his pretend Sunny Sood natak. Sahiba didn't blame him. She supported him. There also in the eventual aftermath of things either Angad or Sahiba could have been dead.
But if Sahiba does something impulsive with good intentions, its judged way more harshly.
She will feel guilty enough, why would anyone make it worse?! Thats just plain cruel. Does she not have any relationship with Inder or child. Like what crap to say she's responsible for death.
She had no idea about her medical history. Who is to say she may not have been more careful if she knew about complications in her pregnancy. Normal pregnancy is not as high risk for physical activity.
If she had not gone or let Inder go alone and the kids died or were not rescued, or Inder died but she was at home- that'll also be on her conscience forever.
Edited by Pinecone - 2 months ago
comment:
p_commentcount