The highest number of runs scored in an over is not 36! See this...

Viswasruti thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#1

The highest number of runs scored in an over is not 36. It’s 77!!


But what many people don’t know is that the bowling team allowed the batting team to get close enough to the target and give them a chance to win so that they take risks and get out!

Edited by Viswasruti - 4 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

9

Views

892

Users

4

Likes

12

Frequent Posters

Posted: 4 years ago
#2

But how does this happen. Through No Balls?

Viswasruti thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: vijay

But how does this happen. Through No Balls?

Maybe like that. If ... >>> 6 no balls sixes! = 42

and all valid 6 balls == sixes -- 36 >>> still the tally is not matching !

Seems a math puzzle?! 🤪

Anyone ... please decode this....

Posted: 4 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: vijay

But how does this happen. Through No Balls?

Yes he gave 16 no balls and 6 4s were hit and 8 6s.

Viswasruti thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: SoniRSippu21

Yes he gave 16 no balls and 6 4s were hit and 8 6s.

How it will be 77? --- 16+24+ 48 = 88 !
Posted: 4 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

How it will be 77? --- 16+24+ 48 = 88 !

The over was as follows: 0444664614106666600401

Bolds are the balls which were legitimate

Viswasruti thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: SoniRSippu21

The over was as follows: 0444664614106666600401

Bolds are the balls which were legitimate

If it is a no ball 4 then the runs will be --5

If a no ball six it will be --7

Then there won't be any simple 4s and 6s! Yes 1 and dots will be possible!

Posted: 4 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

If it is a no ball 4 then the runs will be --5

If a no ball six it will be --7

Then there won't be any simple 4s and 6s! Yes 1 and dots will be possible!

Maybe rules were different that time. This was posted in one of the articles the over detail were like the one i posted about

The over went as follows (the balls in bold are the legitimate ones) – 0444664614106666600401


Viswasruti thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago
#9

In another article over this bizarre over, it was like this!

Yes Soni, as you rightly mentioned , the no ball was not counted as 1 run in those days!! 😃

It has to be kept in mind that if one scored runs off a no-ball in that era, he would not have got runs for the extra ball.

1 4 4 4 6 6 4 6 1 4 1 1 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 4 0 1 ---

As is evident, only 1 of the first 17 deliveries was a legitimate one. Germon himself scored 70 runs off the over, Ford somehow managed to assemble 5, and 2 runs came off no-balls. The confused umpire miscounted and called over after 5 balls.

https://www.cricketcountry.com/articles/bert-vance-concedes-77-runs-off-one-over-103923

Posted: 4 years ago
#10

Before I give my two scents, the mystery has been solved

Some bizarre 1st class test, I say.

Good to know it exists Madhuri.

Cheers...

Related Topics

Indian Premier League thumbnail

Posted by: Savera84 · 5 months ago

Hello members, This is poll number three and the reason for the poll is to decide whether it is fair give points if overs are reduced due to...

Expand ▼
Indian Premier League thumbnail

Posted by: Savera84 · 5 months ago

Hello members, This is poll number one and the reason for the poll is to break a tie between 2 or more players with the same highest runs/...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".