Originally posted by: Courageous_Leo
@Subha ...aisa mat bol yaar π...The only time I enjoyed the show was preleap. Because of Sid , Manoj ji...Just think Kaurwaki was less Quacwacky pre leap...π She was irritating , but Ashoka was in control...π...Yaa I agree pre leap was dragging...But post leap show took a horrible turn...We had an awesum actor like Mohit still...the show was bekar. Mark my words ...Post leap most shows turn romantic...Its not acceptance of new cast...Along with that story plays a significant role...
Ekta maiya will never introduce teenage love stories...Because there is a limit to it...But when they turn adults they can show all bakwas...Because there is freedom..I would say teenage love stories are a boon...π Limited and under control...π
Probably I would have preferred introduction of young Devi and her marriage with Ashoka...(Sid) π...And after that leap...Then Chandashoka...and marriage with Kaurwaki
I have always noticed this since PRC days.The makers show lot of fiction in pre leap tracks and drag them for too long.When they realize,they can't drag anymore they show leap.Due to this,the first impression most of the viewers have is we don't want to accept new actors and therefore we will stop watching it.
I agree the post leap script also gets bakwaas.CAS focused on romance post leap but PRC focused on adult prtithviraj's life as the king.Sagars cast Anas Rashid who was the male Quackwaki of that show so it didn't work even though the script was good.Contiloe casted Mohit but didn't utilize his talent.Just imagine,if they had shown the leap few months before then they had shown Ashok's struggles for the throne,his rivalry with his brothers,takkar between him and helena,I guess the show would have been more interesting if the leap was much earlier. They should have shown all these instead of teenage love story.
This is my opinion. I am not saying anything against Sid.
comment:
p_commentcount