Posted:
For days I've been reading about how this drastic downfall of YHM and Shagun becoming the center of the universe has got nothing to do with nepotism/favoritism and how this always happened in past BT shows. I simply want to ask this: since when does YHM have anything common with those despicable, regressive BT shows? What qualifies YHM to be compared to those bull shits? This isn't 2005 anymore, it's 2015 and before this past two weeks YHM had one of the best positive story lines.
Let's say that YHM is just another BT show that was bound to get ruined in the hands of the villain. But in those BT shows people give examples of, the villains were an integral part of the story. They weren't forced in the story. What qualifies Shagun as the omnipresent villain who is necessary for the story? She isn't a family member you can't kick out, she isn't your powerful business rival you can't defeat, she isn't someone you have a soft corner for who's got a secret vendetta against you. Shagun's necessity in the storyline ended the day Adi refused to acknowledge her as his mother. The villain of YHM is Ashok, it's not Shagun. So, why do you think that suddenly YHM started spinning around orbit Shagun? Why do you think they didn't care about sacrificing their own hero to forcefully fit her in the story? Why would those who advocated for infertile women and their struggle suddenly insult the issue and turn it into a joke? If it's not nepotism/favoritism, I don't know what it is.
Yeh Fitoor Tera
Anupamaa
Cricket
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
