Can wives in a polygamous marriage be friends?

Khushi_love thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#1
Since the time I got hooked to JA, I've often wondered about rivalry between wives in polygamous marriages. Not just those of a monarch, but in general.

Instead of affording their wives the priceless blessings and opportunity to enjoy the uniqueness in marriage, aren't women in polygamous marriages forced to compete for their husband's affections, his attention and love for the rest of their lives? With the fear of becoming the loser, don't these women live in a deep sense of insecurity? Doesn't polygamy actually stand in the way of the pledge binding husbands and wives? Doesn't it also corrode the natural alliance and sisterhood of women because they got to endlessly struggle for the same man??? Esp when so many wives, like Akbar's, are living under one roof. Isn't it suffocating?

Whether the wives see each other or not, I don't think it completely does away with the rivalry. Wives in polygamy compete for the attention, love and affection of their husbands in many ways, even in the bedroom. A wife wants to be the more seductive and the most desired wife.

Can wives who live in a polygamous marriage be friends? Could they be sincere friends with each other when they are rivals? How easy is it for two women to be friends when they try to find out what she thinks, what she likes and does not like and how she interacts with the husband. Information allows a person to gain the upper-hand. What are the thoughts going on in the heads of those rival wives when they communicate with each other?

A few random opinions of wives from polygamous set ups:

1) "It deals death to all sentiments of true womanhood. It enslaves and ruins a woman. It crucifies every God-given feeling of her nature. She is taught that to love her husband as her heart prompts her to do, and to feel the natural jealousy that comes from seeing her husband marry another woman, is wicked, and springs from her innate depravity; that she must crush out and annihilate all such feelings."

2) "How can a wife have those holy and tender feelings which should always be associated with the marriage tie, and which are inseparable from a true union, when she can speak, and to all appearances calmly, of her husband's having gone to stay with some other woman?' What ideas of home love and home associations can children have who talk about 'father's week at the other house,' and who discuss freely which woman is his favorite, and why she is so, and which woman's children he is most indulgent to, and provides for the best?"

Your opinions, please...😊

(Please NO bashing of either Jo or Ruqu if they are brought into the discussion)





Edited by ---Khushi--- - 11 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

141

Views

13.6k

Users

31

Likes

420

Frequent Posters

ghalibmirza thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
very interesting topic! i too want to know those answers..will revert back after doing some thinking..kinda busy now..an excellent topic👍🏼! am looking forward to some thoughtful comments to this post!
Petal_Pose thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#3
Interesting topic.Yes, at in some levels i do think we can define some space and draw our boundaries. But being friends and existing harmoniously ,nope. 😊
Edited by Birdiee - 11 years ago
979039 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#4
khusi
i honestly cannot answer your question . beacuse i cannot fathom that type of situation .recently i was surprised reading kenya passed a law about polygamy and women in that country were happy
but women members in the parliament walked out .
Khushi_love thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#5
Another question:
How right is it for a husband to openly favour one wife over the other? Does it not encourage the rivalry? Isn't it akin to sibling rivalry if a parent favours one child over the other?
myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#6
Very good question
My answer
Husbands in polygomous marriage like draupadi and sharone stone were friends
At one time Ashton Kutcher and Bruce Willis stayed and holiday together with Demi moore and Bruce Willis kids. Same case of pandavas but they were brothers. So may be men can adjust to polygomus weddings.Why? Because husband does not depend on wife for social standing they have individually famous and sccessful profession. And Arjun is a great archer even without draupadi or subadhra, bruce is a great actor despite sharon stone etccc. But yes majority men are not that secure and successful to be not jealous
Wife in polygomous wedding
Wife in a polygomous wedding again depends on how successful she is outside. In 16th century women were known as someone's daughter then wife last mother. They do not have own standing in society except for men with whom they are linked except for very few. Ex: Razi asultan, chand bibi, Queen elizabeth I and Victoria etc. We do not bother who their husbnands are because they have an outside work identity.
But a mughal wife i do not think would be fine with that they will be jealous because your fortune status everything depends on husband not individuality. Except for a jahanara in mughals none of other women had that work identity. Yes a nur jahan had work identity buttt she had no respect in society because of her manipulation of husbands family.
So it all depends do you have another identity are you successful if nottt whether man/women they will be insecure only with respect to spouse. Also how emotionally connected you are to your spouse who has many wives/husbands. If you are not emotionally connected you give a damn if you are his only wife or 300 wife or 30th wife or husband. So why do these women/men stay in that wedding? Simple the benefits associated with your spouse or you have no option at all. In 16th century a woman cannot live alone she require a man either husband, son, brother or father to shelter her even a jahanara. So better to stay in palace and enjoy the luxury associated with it. They anyway have no option if they want to marry another husband, spouse will kill you, your father and brothers shall not accept you in their palaces if you come back leaving husband, that too when they are getting benefitted because they are associated with your husband thru you
Even in 21st century why woman keeps quiet when her husband marries again only for the benefits. Otherwise no woman can love an husband who cheated her and stay in his house its only his money, property and because she has no other option.
Very rarely very rarely a woman stays back for kids if kids are small. If kids are a bit big 10-12 they will also understand that father is not doing right thing and go with mom and support her. But majority spouses lie when they are saing they stay back for kids. Its for the benefits and comfortable life they do not want change and can compromise instead.
Take case of Ashton Kutcher a nobody married Demi moore a super star and her ex husbnand another super duuper star brue willis. It helped top establish him in hollywood. Once that was achieved he moved on. So it all depends what are your priorities in life.
Edited by myviewprem - 11 years ago
Khushi_love thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: myviewprem

Very good question

My answer
Husbands in polygomous marriage like draupadi and sharone stone were friends
At one time Ashton Kutcher and Bruce Willis stayed and holiday together with Sharon stone and Bruce Willis kids. Same case of pandavas but they were brothers. So may be men can adjust to polygomus weddings.Why? Because husband does not depend on wife for social standing they have individually famous and sccessful profession. And Arjun is a great archer even without draupadi or subadhra, bruce is a great actor despite sharon stone etccc. But yes majority men are not that secure and successful to be not jealous
Wife in polygomous wedding
Wife in a polygomous wedding again depends on how successful she is outside. In 16th century women were knownm as someone's daughter then wife last mother. They do not have own standing in society except for men with whom they are linked except for very few. Ex: Razi asultan, chand bibi, Queen elizabeth I and Victoria etc. We do not bother who their husbnands are because they have an outside work identity.
But a mughal wife i do not think would be fine with that they will be jealous because your fortune status everything depends on husband not individuality. Except for a jahanara in mughals none of other women had that work identity. Yes a nur jahan had work identity buttt she had no respect in society because of her manipulation of husbands family.
So it all depends do you have another identity are you successful if nottt whether man/women they will be insecure only with respect to spouse. Also how emotionally connected you are to your spouse who has many wives/husbands. If you are not emotionally connected you give a damn if you are his only wife or 300 wife or 30th wife or husband. So why do these women/men stay in that wedding? Simple the benefits associated with your spouse or you have no option at all. In 16th century a woman cannot live alone she require a man either husband, son, brother or father to shelter her even a jahanara.


Very interesting. To say whether or not I agree to your views, I need time to ponder over your views. Will get back to you definitely.
Khushi_love thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: biancay

khusi

i honestly cannot answer your question . beacuse i cannot fathom that type of situation .recently i was surprised reading kenya passed a law about polygamy and women in that country were happy
but women members in the parliament walked out .


Are you talking about the very recent past?...coz I am not aware of this...will try to catch up about this on the net...thanks 😊
979039 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: myviewprem

Very good question

My answer
Husbands in polygomous marriage like draupadi and sharone stone were friends
At one time Ashton Kutcher and Bruce Willis stayed and holiday together with Sharon stone and Bruce Willis kids. Same case of pandavas but they were brothers. So may be men can adjust to polygomus weddings.Why? Because husband does not depend on wife for social standing they have individually famous and sccessful profession. And Arjun is a great archer even without draupadi or subadhra, bruce is a great actor despite sharon stone etccc. But yes majority men are not that secure and successful to be not jealous
Wife in polygomous wedding
Wife in a polygomous wedding again depends on how successful she is outside. In 16th century women were known as someone's daughter then wife last mother. They do not have own standing in society except for men with whom they are linked except for very few. Ex: Razi asultan, chand bibi, Queen elizabeth I and Victoria etc. We do not bother who their husbnands are because they have an outside work identity.
But a mughal wife i do not think would be fine with that they will be jealous because your fortune status everything depends on husband not individuality. Except for a jahanara in mughals none of other women had that work identity. Yes a nur jahan had work identity buttt she had no respect in society because of her manipulation of husbands family.
So it all depends do you have another identity are you successful if nottt whether man/women they will be insecure only with respect to spouse. Also how emotionally connected you are to your spouse who has many wives/husbands. If you are not emotionally connected you give a damn if you are his only wife or 300 wife or 30th wife or husband. So why do these women/men stay in that wedding? Simple the benefits associated with your spouse or you have no option at all. In 16th century a woman cannot live alone she require a man either husband, son, brother or father to shelter her even a jahanara. So better to stay in palace and enjoy the luxury associated with it. Even in 21st century why woman keeps quiet when her husband marries again only for the benefits. Otherwise no woman can love an husband who cheated her and stay in his house its only his money, property and because she has no other option.
Very rarely very rarely a woman stays back for kids if kids are small. If kids are a bit big 10-12 they will also understand that father is not doing right thing and go with mom and support her. But majority spouses lie when they are saing they stay back for kids. Its for the benefits and comfortable life they do not want change and can compromise instead.
Take case of Ashton Kutcher a nobody married Sharon stone a super star and her ex husbnand another super duuper star brue willis. It helped top establish him in hollywood. Once that was achieved he moved on. So it all depends what are your priorities in life.

not sharon stone ashton kutcher married demi moore.

ashton moved on for that reason that,!s news to me
979039 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: ---Khushi---


Are you talking about the very recent past?...coz I am not aware of this...will try to catch up about this on the net...thanks 😊

it was very recently .i read this week .i was horrified reading situation of women especially in african countries ,nigeria,kenya .that too in 21 st century 2014

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".