Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 25th Oct 2025 - WKV
PLAN CHANGED 25.10
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 26th Oct 2025 - WKV
🏏India tour of Australia, 2025: Australia vs India, 3rd ODI, Sydney🏏
PICHLE JANM KA PUNYA 26.10
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Oct 25, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Actor Satish Shah Passes Away
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Oct 26, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Clip of Deepika justifying infidelity and cheating is going viral
5000 Episodes..
Settle all 3 in Virani's family
I'm disgusted
The Girlfriend - Rashmika - trailer out now.
Sooooo Happy with This Weeks Elimination
Ram Aur Shyam By Anees Bazmi
Alia's agenda behind friendship with Katrina
Pakistan Puts Salman Khan On Watch List
Kyunki forums beats yrkkh forum
Finally watching the Bill Gates epi. Live updates: pics attached
Dronacharya is not my favorite character in the Mahabharat. I do not like the things he did later on either, especially his unethical fighting in the war, but in regards to Ekalavya, I do not find him wrong. He never physically maimed Ekalavya. He told Ekalavya to either stop calling him his Guru, or to give him the Guru dakshina he asked for. The rest was Ekalavya's choice.Originally posted by: -Srushti-
Although, I deprecate differentiation of any kind within students, I do accept that Drona had a right to choose his students...My main contention is that if he so believed in the caste system, why did he resent Drupada for not considering him as equal or for not fulfilling his childhood promise? Wouldnt that be, in my humble opinion, coined as Hypocrisy?? Dronacharya was a Brahmin, so his caste was higher than Drupada's. That is why he was offended when Drupada forgot his promise, whereas Ekalavya belonged to a lower caste. It may be seen as hypocritical in today's time, but not during the Dwapar Yuga.
Eklavya belonged to a tribe and I dont think they were very well off...and Eklavya had a right to choose his guru just like Drona had a right to reject him...Eklvavya did not resort to deceit (MY POV) he just made the best of what he could have... All of us have a right to choose a Guru, but when the Guru rejects us, we need to take the rejection with a cool mind and look elsewhere. I'm not saying Ekalavya did not have the right to choose his own Guru, but Dronacharya already rejected him so he did not have the right to claim education from him.Knowledge has to be free...the Privatization is and always a abhorring thing ..Everybody has a right to be educated. Compare the characters of Karna and Ekalavya, both of whom belonged to lower castes and poor families. Even Karna was rejected by Dronacharya on the basis of his caste, but instead of secretly taking knowledge from him, he looked elsewhere and found Parashuram. Karna did not resort to deceit to get what he wanted. Knowledge that is gotten with deceit never lasts, which is why Ekalavya's did not last either.Deceit would be a strong word...How? When a teacher denies giving you knowledge, then it's the duty of the student to accept the rejection and look elsewhere. It's like if we went to a university and sat in a class without being accepted as a student. The university has a right to punish us. and punishment should not have been to maime anyone for ever...even Parshuram's curse was not so severe...and if Drona believed that he did not give any Shiksha to him he could not have asked for the Dakshina...and if he did consider Eklavya to be his student, he should not have considered it as a deceit...Drona was testing Ekalavya. He had rejected him once and still Ekalavya claimed himself to be a student. If Ekalavya really claimed to be a student, then he had to give Guru dakshina, and if he did not want to give Guru dakshina, then he could not use his name for his advantage. Drona never forced Ekalavya to give him his thumb. He simply said, "if you consider me your Guru, then I want your thumb as Guru dakshina." Ekalavya could have rejected him easily, but he knew he had fallen into a trap. It was his own choice to give up his thumb then, so I don't hold Drona responsible for it.
Originally posted by: -Srushti-
Mein aa gai😛
But before I start my nonsense Rambling...Let me put the Disclamer:Disclaimer: I am a Maha Murkh Praani, and Since I have declared myself the same, nobody needs to repeat it😛 My knowledge borders extinction and I might just be kicked out of the Forum for not having read the Scriptures: Any errors are human and I wont mind rectification...but if there is some good logic in the post, Requesting you Gyaani people to jump in to discuss and lead us into enlightenment!!Drona...The most famous Guru ...His fame (As per me) eclipsed the fame of Guru Samdipani ...mainly because the role of Dronacharya was longer and pivotal in the journey towards Kurukshetra...Drona as most of the characters in Mahabharat had an unconventional birth...(amazing how Mahabharat seems to be the dictionary of unconventional births!!) and was not born out of a womb...He went on to claim the half Kingdom that Drupada had promised him as a child...Not ssaying that Drupada's behaviour was exemplary. He was wrong...But I do believe that Drona took the humiliation to a level where he included a lot of people.Asking a Guru Dakshina from his students, who belonged to a royal family, to attack Panchal was not a very noble agenda...To satisfy his own personal vengeance he used the men power and resources of a state which had sheltered him and used it to attack another state, whose citizens were no where liable for his personal insult...Although may be the above can be said to be a lesson for all the mighty kings who consider themselves superior and above anybody...and Two Kings (As far I can recollect at this moment) suffered for insulting Brahmins in their Darbaar...One is Drupada and the other one would be Dhana Nanda...But the few of his actions do put a question whether he was more bounden to the throne than the duties...His apparent partiality towards Arjun which made him ask for the thumb of Eklavya as GuruDakshina...Rejecting Karna when he could see that Radhey had so much of skills...He forgot that he had faced similar rejection at the hands of Drupada..the difference between classes and status...
Originally posted by: -Srushti-
And ofcourse his alliance with the throne was so strong that he did not stop Draupadi Cheerharnan...The wife of his favourite student...
Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath
One thing I never understood was why Dronacharya was obligated to fight for the Kauravas. 😕 The reason the epic gives is that he felt indebted to them since Hastinapur gave him a home, food, and shelter, but it's not like he took it all for free. He gave the Kuru children an education in return, so neither was he indebted to Hastinapur, nor was Hastinapur indebted to him. After the education of the Pandavas and Kauravas was over, Dronacharya's ties to Hastinapur were pretty much over. He was not at all obligated to fight in the war, unlike Bhishma who did have a pretty valid reason, whether we agree it or not.
Actually, I've read the MB hard, and have not located a place where Bheeshma was duty bound to fight for the Kauravas.
One more thing I forgot to add above - it was unseemly for a guru to have a favorite pupil to the point that he sought to damage other real or potential pupils of his to ensure that only his favorite pupil remained the #1 warrior. Really petty! Should a guru be remembered for having just one exceptional pupil, or several brilliant ones?Opinions, people?
Originally posted by: india2050
@Vrish.
Why would Parashurama not make your list of good gurus. I agree he was short tempered and some fierce hatred for the Kshatriyas, but he did seem to be a good guru.His 3 famous students Bheeshma, Drona and Karna could only be killed after they had kept aside their weapons clearly indicating that whatever he taught the 3 of them he taught them quite well.The only fault I could see was he taught Bheeshma knowing that he was a Kshatriya (maybe Lord Shiva might have influenced) but was unhappy when he came to know that Karna was a Kshatriya and cursed him
That tiger of Bhrigu's race (viz., Rama), was well-pleased with the might of Karna's arms, his affection (for him), his self-restraint, and the services he did unto his preceptor. Observant of ascetic penances, Rama cheerfully communicated, with due forms, unto his penance-observing disciple, everything about the Brahma weapon with the mantras for withdrawing it. Having acquired a knowledge of that weapon, Karna began to pass his days happily in Bhrigu's retreat, and endued with wonderful prowess, he devoted himself with great ardour to the science of weapons.
One day Rama of great intelligence, while roving with Karna in the vicinity or his retreat, felt very weak in consequence of the fasts he had undergone. From affection begotten by confidence, the tired son of Jamadagni placing his head on Karna's lap, slept soundly, White his preceptor was thus sleeping (with head) on his lap, a frightful worm, whose bite was very painful and which subsisted on phlegm and fat and flesh and blood, approached the presence of Karna. That blood-sucking worm, approaching Karna's thigh, began to pierce it. Through fear of (awaking) his preceptor, Karna became unable to either throw away or kill that worm. Though his limb was bored through by that worm, O Bharata, the son of Surya, lest his preceptor should awake, suffered it to do its pleasure. Though the pain was intolerable, Karna bore it with heroic patience, and continued to hold Bhrigu's son on his lap, without quivering in the least and without manifesting any sign of pain.
When at last Karna's blood touched the body of Rama of great energy, the latter awoke and said these words in fear, 'Alas, I have been made impure! What is this that thou art doing, Tell me, casting off all fear, what is the truth of this matter!' Then Karna informed him of that worm's bite.
Rama saw that worm which resembled a hog in shape. It had eight feet and very keen teeth, and it was covered with bristles that were all pointed like needles. Called by the name of Alarka, its limbs were then shrunk (with fear). As soon as Rama cast his, eyes on it, the worm gave up its life-breath, melting in that blood which it had drawn. All this seemed wonderful. Then in the welkin was seen a Rakshasa of terrible form, dark in hue, of a red neck, capable of assuming any form at wilt, and staying on the clouds,--his object fulfilled, the Rakshasa, with joined hands, addressed Rama, saying, 'O best of ascetics, thou hast rescued me from this hell! Blessed be thou, I adore thee, thou hast done me good!'
Possessed of great energy, the mighty-armed son of Jamadagni said unto him, 'Who art thou? And why also didst thou fall into hell? Tell me all about it.' He answered, 'Formerly I was a great Asura of the name of Dansa. In the Krita period, O sire, I was of the same age with Bhrigu. I ravished the dearly-loved spouse of that sage. Through his curse I felt down on the earth in the form of a worm. In anger thy ancestors said unto me, 'Subsisting on urine and phlegm, O wretch, thou shalt lead a life of hell.' I then besought him, saying, 'When, O Brahmana, shall this curse end?' Bhrigu replied unto me, saying. 'This curse shall end through Rama of my race. It was for this that I had obtained such a course of life like one of uncleansed soul.
O righteous one, by thee, however, I have been rescued from that sinful life.' Having said these words, the great Asura, bending his head unto Rama went away.
Then Rama wrathfully addressed Karna, saying, 'O fool, no Brahmana could endure such agony. Thy patience is like that of a Kshatriya. Tell me the truth, without fear.' Thus asked, Karna, fearing to be cursed, and seeking to gratify him, said these words, 'O thou of Bhrigu's race, know me for a Suta, a race that has sprung from the intermixture of Brahmanas with Kshatriyas. People call me Karna the son of Radha. O thou of Bhrigu's race, be gratified with my poor self that has acted from the desire of obtaining weapons. There is no doubt in this that a reverend preceptor in the Vedas and other branches of knowledge is one's father. It was for this that I introduced myself to thee as a person of thy own race.'
Unto the cheerless and trembling Karna, prostrated with joined hands upon earth, that foremost one of Bhrigu's race, smiling though filled with wrath, answered, 'Since thou hast, from avarice of weapons, behaved here with falsehood, therefore, O wretch, this Brahma weapon shalt not dwell in thy remembrance.
Since thou art not a Brahmana, truly this Brahma weapon shall not, up to the time of thy death, dwell in thee when thou shalt be engaged with a warrior equal to thyself! Go hence, this is no place for a person of such false behaviour as thou! On earth, no Kshatriya will be thy equal in battle.' Thus addressed by Rama, Karna came away, having duty taken his leave. Arriving then before Duryodhana, he informed him, saying, 'I have mastered all weapons!
Originally posted by: shripadk
I don't think Karna told Parashuram that he was a Brahmin. He just told him he wasn't a kshatriya, which was correct as far as he knew. Parashuram did not mind teaching a suta putra. It was only later that Parashuram understood Karna was a kshatriya, and he thought Karna was lying to him.
I'll have to cross reference the source, but I'm pretty sure Karna did not knowingly lie to Parashuram.