Drona - A True Guru or an Ambitious Person?? - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

62

Views

9.3k

Users

21

Likes

131

Frequent Posters

shivpriya thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#21
I personally never liked Dronacharya, he was selfish, ambitious and partial. A teacher should never be partial with his students, rather than favouring the best he should focus on helping the weaker students become better. Dronacharya might be immensely skilled and learned man but according to me he was not worth all the respect. The worst thing is that he 'used' his best student to achieve his own ambitions. He's the worst Guru ever, even today we find such teachers who use their students! who are biased! They only add insult to this respectable profession.
Edited by shivpriya - 11 years ago
Intrepida thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#22
Drona is an example of Karma determining your status and not your birth; He is a warrior, and his personal qualities and behaviour is like that too;
he becomes a guru. Guru can be anyone who teaches, doesnt mean that person is without flaws but what matters is their good teachings,
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#23

Originally posted by: -Srushti-

Although, I deprecate differentiation of any kind within students, I do accept that Drona had a right to choose his students...My main contention is that if he so believed in the caste system, why did he resent Drupada for not considering him as equal or for not fulfilling his childhood promise? Wouldnt that be, in my humble opinion, coined as Hypocrisy?? Dronacharya was a Brahmin, so his caste was higher than Drupada's. That is why he was offended when Drupada forgot his promise, whereas Ekalavya belonged to a lower caste. It may be seen as hypocritical in today's time, but not during the Dwapar Yuga.

Eklavya belonged to a tribe and I dont think they were very well off...and Eklavya had a right to choose his guru just like Drona had a right to reject him...Eklvavya did not resort to deceit (MY POV) he just made the best of what he could have... All of us have a right to choose a Guru, but when the Guru rejects us, we need to take the rejection with a cool mind and look elsewhere. I'm not saying Ekalavya did not have the right to choose his own Guru, but Dronacharya already rejected him so he did not have the right to claim education from him.

Knowledge has to be free...the Privatization is and always a abhorring thing ..Everybody has a right to be educated. Compare the characters of Karna and Ekalavya, both of whom belonged to lower castes and poor families. Even Karna was rejected by Dronacharya on the basis of his caste, but instead of secretly taking knowledge from him, he looked elsewhere and found Parashuram. Karna did not resort to deceit to get what he wanted. Knowledge that is gotten with deceit never lasts, which is why Ekalavya's did not last either.

Deceit would be a strong word...How? When a teacher denies giving you knowledge, then it's the duty of the student to accept the rejection and look elsewhere. It's like if we went to a university and sat in a class without being accepted as a student. The university has a right to punish us. and punishment should not have been to maime anyone for ever...even Parshuram's curse was not so severe...and if Drona believed that he did not give any Shiksha to him he could not have asked for the Dakshina...and if he did consider Eklavya to be his student, he should not have considered it as a deceit...Drona was testing Ekalavya. He had rejected him once and still Ekalavya claimed himself to be a student. If Ekalavya really claimed to be a student, then he had to give Guru dakshina, and if he did not want to give Guru dakshina, then he could not use his name for his advantage. Drona never forced Ekalavya to give him his thumb. He simply said, "if you consider me your Guru, then I want your thumb as Guru dakshina." Ekalavya could have rejected him easily, but he knew he had fallen into a trap. It was his own choice to give up his thumb then, so I don't hold Drona responsible for it.

Dronacharya is not my favorite character in the Mahabharat. I do not like the things he did later on either, especially his unethical fighting in the war, but in regards to Ekalavya, I do not find him wrong. He never physically maimed Ekalavya. He told Ekalavya to either stop calling him his Guru, or to give him the Guru dakshina he asked for. The rest was Ekalavya's choice.
shripadk thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#24

Originally posted by: -Srushti-

Mein aa gai😛

But before I start my nonsense Rambling...Let me put the Disclamer:

Disclaimer: I am a Maha Murkh Praani, and Since I have declared myself the same, nobody needs to repeat it😛 My knowledge borders extinction and I might just be kicked out of the Forum for not having read the Scriptures: Any errors are human and I wont mind rectification...but if there is some good logic in the post, Requesting you Gyaani people to jump in to discuss and lead us into enlightenment!!



Drona...
The most famous Guru ...His fame (As per me) eclipsed the fame of Guru Samdipani ...mainly because the role of Dronacharya was longer and pivotal in the journey towards Kurukshetra...

Drona as most of the characters in Mahabharat had an unconventional birth...(amazing how Mahabharat seems to be the dictionary of unconventional births!!) and was not born out of a womb...

He went on to claim the half Kingdom that Drupada had promised him as a child...Not ssaying that Drupada's behaviour was exemplary. He was wrong...But I do believe that Drona took the humiliation to a level where he included a lot of people.
Asking a Guru Dakshina from his students, who belonged to a royal family, to attack Panchal was not a very noble agenda...To satisfy his own personal vengeance he used the men power and resources of a state which had sheltered him and used it to attack another state, whose citizens were no where liable for his personal insult...

Although may be the above can be said to be a lesson for all the mighty kings who consider themselves superior and above anybody...and Two Kings (As far I can recollect at this moment) suffered for insulting Brahmins in their Darbaar...One is Drupada and the other one would be Dhana Nanda...

But the few of his actions do put a question whether he was more bounden to the throne than the duties...
His apparent partiality towards Arjun which made him ask for the thumb of Eklavya as GuruDakshina...Rejecting Karna when he could see that Radhey had so much of skills...He forgot that he had faced similar rejection at the hands of Drupada..the difference between classes and status...


He was not partial to Ekalavya. In fact it was wrong on the part of Ekalavya to learn without the permission of a Guru. That was the norm of the days back then. But since he did it anyways, Drona was perfectly right in asking for Dakshina. But Drona could have asked anything for Dakshina... he choosing to take the thumb of Ekalavya was far fetched.
When it came to rejecting Karna, he was again wrong. The reason: Caste system. Dronacharya was a Brahmin by caste and he was supposed to follow the duties of a Brahmin.. that is to impart knowledge to anyone who seeks knowledge. He however chose to teach only Kshatriya's because of his vengeance against Drupad. This is not to say he was against teaching Karna. But had he not made his Vow he wouldn't have refused Karna or Ekalavya.

However, this should not be an excuse to defend Karna or Ekalavya. Both showed in their own ways that they could achieve a lot even without the blessings of Dronacharya.

Originally posted by: -Srushti-

And ofcourse his alliance with the throne was so strong that he did not stop Draupadi Cheerharnan...The wife of his favourite student...

shripadk thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath

Edited by shripadk - 11 years ago

shripadk thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath

One thing I never understood was why Dronacharya was obligated to fight for the Kauravas. 😕 The reason the epic gives is that he felt indebted to them since Hastinapur gave him a home, food, and shelter, but it's not like he took it all for free. He gave the Kuru children an education in return, so neither was he indebted to Hastinapur, nor was Hastinapur indebted to him. After the education of the Pandavas and Kauravas was over, Dronacharya's ties to Hastinapur were pretty much over. He was not at all obligated to fight in the war, unlike Bhishma who did have a pretty valid reason, whether we agree it or not.


No, he was employed after the imparted education to both Kauravas and Pandavas to remain as an advisor to King Dhritharashtra by Bhishma. That way, he was again indebt. The same was the case with Kripacharya who was never a Guru to Kauravas or the Pandavas but held the position of Rajguru and hence was indebted again.
shripadk thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Actually, I've read the MB hard, and have not located a place where Bheeshma was duty bound to fight for the Kauravas.

One more thing I forgot to add above - it was unseemly for a guru to have a favorite pupil to the point that he sought to damage other real or potential pupils of his to ensure that only his favorite pupil remained the #1 warrior. Really petty! Should a guru be remembered for having just one exceptional pupil, or several brilliant ones?

Opinions, people?


No my friend. If you have read Mahabharata hard then how did you miss Bhishma's vows? One of the vows was to protect Hastinapur and was always answerable to the King of Hastinapur. This way he was duty bound to fight for Kauravas.
Edited by shripadk - 11 years ago
Anurulz thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#28
interesting topic srushti..i personally feel, drona was not tht great a teacher..yes, he was talented in his art..but the qualities to be a great teacher is beyond just being talented..one of the main things which set a teacher apart is his humility and his love to impart knowledge..drona had always calculated each and every move he made..the issue with drupad was one of two egos clashing, both being immature.. we let tht go..but he chose to train the kurus looking for power,not for teaching per se..it was like, which "powerful" person can i bind to myself, to take my revenge.. he liked the pandavas, but at each step, he supported the kauravas, not only for his putra-moh, but for the basic fact tht he thought they were a more powerful lot, being the king's sons.. yes, the whole saga started coz of his love for his son and the milk/flour-water story, but continued coz of his thirst for power..whenever he has had to make a choice, he has chosen his ambitions over dharma..
shripadk thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#29

Originally posted by: india2050

@Vrish.

Why would Parashurama not make your list of good gurus. I agree he was short tempered and some fierce hatred for the Kshatriyas, but he did seem to be a good guru.

His 3 famous students Bheeshma, Drona and Karna could only be killed after they had kept aside their weapons clearly indicating that whatever he taught the 3 of them he taught them quite well.

The only fault I could see was he taught Bheeshma knowing that he was a Kshatriya (maybe Lord Shiva might have influenced) but was unhappy when he came to know that Karna was a Kshatriya and cursed him


Wrong interpretation. Lord Parashuram never said he wouldn't teach Kshatriyas. Where did you come to this conclusion? Lord Parashuram only taught selected pupils. Not even regular Brahmins/Kshatriyas.

In fact BR Chopra's Mahabharat and probably even this Mahabharat will show as if Karna came to learn under Dronacharya and that Dronacharya refused to teach him. This is a lie propagated by the serials of our times and its extremely unfortunate. In fact this is not true... Karna was a disciple of Dronacharya. However only when he yearns to learn from Dronacharaya the secrets of invoking Brahmastra to kill Arjuna, Drona refuses him. This one can only understand if they read the original "Kisar Mohan Ganguli's" english translation of "Ved Vyas's Mahabharat". The relevant chapters are: http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12a002.htm and http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m12/m12a003.htm

I'll quote here for reference:

Sage Narada says to King Janmejaya:

It is even so, O mighty armed one, as thou sayest, O Bharata! Nothing could resist Karna and Arjuna in battle. This, O sinless one, that I am about to tell thee is unknown to the very gods. Listen to me, O mighty-armed one, as it befell in former days. How all the Kshatriyas, cleansed by weapons should attain to regions of bliss, was the question.

For this, a child was conceived by Kunti in her maidenhood, capable of provoking a general war. Endued with great energy, that child came to have the status of a Suta. He subsequently acquired the science of weapons from the preceptor (Drona), that foremost descendant of Angirasa's race. Thinking of the might of Bhimasena, the quickness of Arjuna in the use of weapons, the intelligence of thyself, O king, the humility of the twins, the friendship, from earliest years, between Vasudeva and the wielder of Gandiva, and the affection of the people for you all, that young man burnt with envy. In early age he made friends with king Duryodhana, led by an accident and his own nature and the hate he bore towards you all.

Beholding that Dhananjaya was superior to every one in the science of weapons Karna. one day approached Drona in private and said these words unto him, 'I desire to be acquainted with theBrahma weapon, with all its mantras and the power of withdrawing it, for I desire to fight Arjuna. Without doubt, the affection thou bearest to every one of thy pupils is equal to what thou bearest to thy own son. I pray that all the masters of the science of weapons may, through thy grace, regard me as one accomplished in weapons!' Thus addressed by him, Drona, from partiality for Phalguna, as also from his knowledge of the wickedness of Karna, said, 'None but a Brahmana, who has duly observed all vows, should be acquainted with the Brahma weapon, or a Kshatriya that has practised austere penances, and no other.'

Karna goes meets Parashuram:

When Drona had answered thus, Karna, having worshipped him, obtained his leave, and proceeded without delay to Rama then residing on the Mahendra mountains. Approaching Rama, he bent his head unto him and said, 'I am a Brahmana of Bhrigu's race.'

This procured honour for him. With this knowledge about his birth and family, Rama received him kindly and said, 'Thou art welcome!' at which Karna became highly glad. While residing on the Mahendra mountains that resembled heaven itself, Karna met and mixed with many Gandharvas,Yakshas, and gods. Residing there he acquired all the weapons duly, and became a great favourite of the gods, the Gandharvas, and the Rakshasas.

Karna's first curse by an Agnihortri:

One day he roved on the sea-coast by the side of that asylum. Indeed, Surya's son, armed with bow and sword, wandered alone, While thus employed, O Partha, he inadvertently slew, without witting it, the Homa cow of a certain utterer of Brahma who daily performed his Agnihotra rite. Knowing that he had perpetrated that act from inadvertence, he informed the Brahmana of it. Indeed Karna, for the object of gratifying the owner, repeatedly said, 'O holy one, I have killed this thy cow without wilting it. Forgive me the act!' Filled with wrath, the Brahmana, rebuking him, said these words, 'O thou of wicked conduct, thou deservest to be killed. Let the fruit of this act be thine, O thou of wicked soul. While fighting him, O wretch whom thou always challengest, and for whose sake thou strivest so much every day, the earth shall swallow the wheel of thy car! And while the wheel of thy car shall thus be swallowed up by the earth, thy foe, putting forth his prowess, will cut off thy head, thyself being stupefied the while! Leave me, O vile man! As thou hast heedlessly slain this my cow, even so wilt thy foe cut off thy head while thou shalt be heedless!' Though cursed, Karna still sought to gratify that foremost of Brahmanas by offering him kine and wealth and gems. The latter, however, once more answered him, 'All the words will not succeed in falsifying the words spoken by me! Go hence or remain, do whatever thou likest.' Thus addressed by the Brahmana, Karna, hanging down his head from cheerlessness, returned timidly to Rama, reflecting on that matter.'

Karna's second curse by Lord Parashuram narrated by Sage Narada to King Janmejaya:

That tiger of Bhrigu's race (viz., Rama), was well-pleased with the might of Karna's arms, his affection (for him), his self-restraint, and the services he did unto his preceptor. Observant of ascetic penances, Rama cheerfully communicated, with due forms, unto his penance-observing disciple, everything about the Brahma weapon with the mantras for withdrawing it. Having acquired a knowledge of that weapon, Karna began to pass his days happily in Bhrigu's retreat, and endued with wonderful prowess, he devoted himself with great ardour to the science of weapons.

One day Rama of great intelligence, while roving with Karna in the vicinity or his retreat, felt very weak in consequence of the fasts he had undergone. From affection begotten by confidence, the tired son of Jamadagni placing his head on Karna's lap, slept soundly, White his preceptor was thus sleeping (with head) on his lap, a frightful worm, whose bite was very painful and which subsisted on phlegm and fat and flesh and blood, approached the presence of Karna. That blood-sucking worm, approaching Karna's thigh, began to pierce it. Through fear of (awaking) his preceptor, Karna became unable to either throw away or kill that worm. Though his limb was bored through by that worm, O Bharata, the son of Surya, lest his preceptor should awake, suffered it to do its pleasure. Though the pain was intolerable, Karna bore it with heroic patience, and continued to hold Bhrigu's son on his lap, without quivering in the least and without manifesting any sign of pain.

When at last Karna's blood touched the body of Rama of great energy, the latter awoke and said these words in fear, 'Alas, I have been made impure! What is this that thou art doing, Tell me, casting off all fear, what is the truth of this matter!' Then Karna informed him of that worm's bite.

Rama saw that worm which resembled a hog in shape. It had eight feet and very keen teeth, and it was covered with bristles that were all pointed like needles. Called by the name of Alarka, its limbs were then shrunk (with fear). As soon as Rama cast his, eyes on it, the worm gave up its life-breath, melting in that blood which it had drawn. All this seemed wonderful. Then in the welkin was seen a Rakshasa of terrible form, dark in hue, of a red neck, capable of assuming any form at wilt, and staying on the clouds,--his object fulfilled, the Rakshasa, with joined hands, addressed Rama, saying, 'O best of ascetics, thou hast rescued me from this hell! Blessed be thou, I adore thee, thou hast done me good!'

Possessed of great energy, the mighty-armed son of Jamadagni said unto him, 'Who art thou? And why also didst thou fall into hell? Tell me all about it.' He answered, 'Formerly I was a great Asura of the name of Dansa. In the Krita period, O sire, I was of the same age with Bhrigu. I ravished the dearly-loved spouse of that sage. Through his curse I felt down on the earth in the form of a worm. In anger thy ancestors said unto me, 'Subsisting on urine and phlegm, O wretch, thou shalt lead a life of hell.' I then besought him, saying, 'When, O Brahmana, shall this curse end?' Bhrigu replied unto me, saying. 'This curse shall end through Rama of my race. It was for this that I had obtained such a course of life like one of uncleansed soul.

O righteous one, by thee, however, I have been rescued from that sinful life.' Having said these words, the great Asura, bending his head unto Rama went away.

Then Rama wrathfully addressed Karna, saying, 'O fool, no Brahmana could endure such agony. Thy patience is like that of a Kshatriya. Tell me the truth, without fear.' Thus asked, Karna, fearing to be cursed, and seeking to gratify him, said these words, 'O thou of Bhrigu's race, know me for a Suta, a race that has sprung from the intermixture of Brahmanas with Kshatriyas. People call me Karna the son of Radha. O thou of Bhrigu's race, be gratified with my poor self that has acted from the desire of obtaining weapons. There is no doubt in this that a reverend preceptor in the Vedas and other branches of knowledge is one's father. It was for this that I introduced myself to thee as a person of thy own race.'

Unto the cheerless and trembling Karna, prostrated with joined hands upon earth, that foremost one of Bhrigu's race, smiling though filled with wrath, answered, 'Since thou hast, from avarice of weapons, behaved here with falsehood, therefore, O wretch, this Brahma weapon shalt not dwell in thy remembrance.

Since thou art not a Brahmana, truly this Brahma weapon shall not, up to the time of thy death, dwell in thee when thou shalt be engaged with a warrior equal to thyself! Go hence, this is no place for a person of such false behaviour as thou! On earth, no Kshatriya will be thy equal in battle.' Thus addressed by Rama, Karna came away, having duty taken his leave. Arriving then before Duryodhana, he informed him, saying, 'I have mastered all weapons!

RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#30

Originally posted by: shripadk



I don't think Karna told Parashuram that he was a Brahmin. He just told him he wasn't a kshatriya, which was correct as far as he knew. Parashuram did not mind teaching a suta putra. It was only later that Parashuram understood Karna was a kshatriya, and he thought Karna was lying to him.

I'll have to cross reference the source, but I'm pretty sure Karna did not knowingly lie to Parashuram.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".