Originally posted by: Shadow-Fax
Why couldn't they make anandi pitted against a person who is good never changing into a grey shaded character, for a change?
Gauri, she looked fine in the start, but then when she came into Jagya's life they made her selfish, manipulative, arrogant and negative.
Jagya used to be a good guy who loved anandi, to prove their point on child marriage, and to paint anandi a victim they made him grey.
Even Shiv was showed with grey shades during Sanchi and Jagya track.
Why couldn't the creatives show Mangala completely positive character right from the start of this mother's struggle till the end just like Ira and Meenu were there? Why the unnecessary transformation of characters like Mangala into totally black shades?
She saved Nandini many times, tried to protect her from people like Akhiraj and Kundan, stood for Nandini when no one was there for her.
Does Mangala deserve this? She might have manipulated the situations many times, but just these things make others especially Nandini forget what her Teesa did for her in Jhalra??
It just shows that the people who stand against Anandi are bad, no matter how many good they have done in the past. Pathetic glorification of the lead@bold; yes it's unfortunate that Managla's hardwork and efforts had no value. She was walked over by everyone as if she was some trash.The bottom line is: If Anandi's line cannot be made lengthier, shorten someone else's.But real life principles and thought processes are different.Despite Mangala's clear cut wrong methods, deception and plotting, there is one set of audience who can sympathise and look out for her emotions. While Anandi, who is the "supposed" victim couldn't garner much sympathy or empathy as a character despite facing such huge emotional losses.Cvs can show what they like, because it's their concept. But will every concept of theirs get logical acceptance, will always be a question. This track of Anandi losing he baby and then re-uniting with her was just a waste of time. It had no logic or take home value. It was a poorly conceptualised and executed track.
@bold; yes it's unfortunate that Managla's hardwork and efforts had no value. She was walked over by everyone as if she was some trash.The bottom line is: If Anandi's line cannot be made lengthier, shorten someone else's.But real life principles and thought processes are different.Despite Mangala's clear cut wrong methods, deception and plotting, there is one set of audience who can sympathise and look out for her emotions. While Anandi, who is the "supposed" victim couldn't garner much sympathy or empathy as a character despite facing such huge emotional losses.Cvs can show what they like, because it's their concept. But will every concept of theirs get logical acceptance, will always be a question. This track of Anandi losing he baby and then re-uniting with her was just a waste of time. It had no logic or take home value. It was a poorly conceptualised and executed track.
Originally posted by: russhmeSS
Yes yes if anyone else does anything wrong then poor he or she is butchered, but if Anandi does anything wrong then she IS wrong 😆
Anandi's second pati was mahan irrespective of butchering anyone.. He didn't need anyone to show him mahan. He was born mahan and he remained mahan till the end.
comment:
p_commentcount