Exclusive: Your first glimpse of Aaradhya Bachchan - Page 14

Originally posted by: Ms.Reddy

Each of your statements has been poorly researched, without any basis, And with all those false assumptions, conveniently you would end up with this conclusion! As I said before, people only believe what they want to believe, regardless of it being true or not.

Originally posted by: newbie2011

😆 the bolded part was the funniest of all.  the only point that made sense from your entire post is 'people only believe what they want to believe, regardless of it being true or not.' Obviously you have your own biases and can easily distort 'facts' to support your interpretations.  Being a fan is one thing, but being a blind fan is another thing altogether. I will leave you to your interpretations, but please don't attack mine. We all have a right to express our opinions in here.  

Yes, poorly researched. You said nobody is interested in seeing Aaradhya's face, when there is immense curiosity and interest about the way the baby looks, both in the media and in the people. You said she has never been clicked at the airport in Cannes, when she has been clicked there multiple times, for which I even provided links in the previous post.

If you choose to ignore that and still want to believe I am blind, be my guest. As I said, people only believe what they want to believe, regardless of it being true or not. So, lage raho!

I stand by my statement that all photos associated with Cannes are pre-arranged events (which is quite self-explanatory).  Had you not killed the thread, would have loved to read and discuss differing points of view.  Instead, you are acting like a troll in here, stalking all my comments.   If you have a point to make, be independent enough to make one of your own without quoting me or referring to me, for God's sake!  Henceforth, you will be royally ignored  ( "Talk to the hand" ).  Edited by newbie2011 - 11 years ago

^^ Your statement was not whether the photos clicked at the airport in Cannes are pre-arranged are not. Please read your own comment again. Your statement was that she was never clicked before until this year.. which I corrected.

If you do not want your statements rebutted, you might as well not post them on a public forum. Please endorse your statements to a wall or a rock and they will never point out the obvious and correct your post. Because the very point of a public forum is a discussion/debate. But I guess you cannot fathom it, going by how aghast you are for I replied to a couple of posts of yours pointing out your false info. And then hitting below the belt by making personal attacks at me. FAIL.

Her baby's pink from the back, so exclusive. I give up, I won't even react the day I actually see her face now -__- 

You know what's funny?

These are my reason for why they are hiding the baby:

Given the rude comments on Suhana in this forum which is a more or less controlled environment I can see the Aishwarya's point in trying obsessively hide her child's face. If Suhana can be called a thing of a different breed just because she has one celebrity parent just imagine the rude comments on Aaradhaya who has celebrity parents and grandparents.

this topic is still going on???😆